25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Definitive Care for the Critically Ill During a Disaster: Medical Resources for Surge Capacity : From a Task Force for Mass Critical Care Summit Meeting, January 26–27, 2007, Chicago, IL

      research-article
      , MD, PhD a , * , , MD b , , MD, MPH, FCCP c , , MS, RRT d , , RN, MSN, RRT e , , MD f , , MD, MPH, FCCP g , , MD h , , MD, MPH, FCCP i , , PharmD j , , RN, MS k , , MD, FCCP l
      Chest
      American College of Chest Physicians
      disaster medicine, influenza pandemic, mass casualty medical care, medical surge capacity, CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, EMCC, emergency mass critical care, IMCU, intermediate care unit, NIPPV, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, PPV, positive pressure ventilation, RT, respiratory therapist

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Mass numbers of critically ill disaster victims will stress the abilities of health-care systems to maintain usual critical care services for all in need. To enhance the number of patients who can receive life-sustaining interventions, the Task Force on Mass Critical Care (hereafter termed the Task Force) has suggested a framework for providing limited, essential critical care, termed emergency mass critical care (EMCC). This article suggests medical equipment, concepts to expand treatment spaces, and staffing models for EMCC.

          Methods

          Consensus suggestions for EMCC were derived from published clinical practice guidelines and medical resource utilization data for the everyday critical care conditions that are anticipated to predominate during mass critical care events. When necessary, expert opinion was used.

          Task Force major suggestions

          The Task Force makes the following suggestions: (1) one mechanical ventilator that meets specific characteristics, as well as a set of consumable and durable medical equipment, should be provided for each EMCC patient; (2) EMCC should be provided in hospitals or similarly equipped structures; after ICUs, postanesthesia care units, and emergency departments all reach capacity, hospital locations should be repurposed for EMCC in the following order: (A) step-down units and large procedure suites, (B) telemetry units, and (C) hospital wards; and (3) hospitals can extend the provision of critical care using non-critical care personnel via a deliberate model of delegation to match staff competencies with patient needs.

          Discussion

          By using the Task Force suggestions for adequate supplies of medical equipment, appropriate treatment space, and trained staff, communities may better prepare to deliver augmented essential critical care in response to disasters.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A multiple-center survey on the use in clinical practice of noninvasive ventilation as a first-line intervention for acute respiratory distress syndrome.

          In randomized studies of heterogeneous patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) was associated with a significant reduction in endotracheal intubation. The role of NPPV in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is still unclear. The objective was to investigate the application of NPPV as a first-line intervention in patients with early ARDS, describing what happens in everyday clinical practice in centers having expertise with NPPV. Prospective, multiple-center cohort study. Three European intensive care units having expertise with NPPV. Between March 2002 and April 2004, 479 patients with ARDS were admitted to the intensive care units. Three hundred and thirty-two ARDS patients were already intubated, so 147 were eligible for the study. Application of NPPV. NPPV improved gas exchange and avoided intubation in 79 patients (54%). Avoidance of intubation was associated with less ventilator-associated pneumonia (2% vs. 20%; p 34 and a Pao2/Fio2 34 and the inability to improve Pao2/Fio2 after 1 hr of NPPV were predictors of failure.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effectiveness of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Failure in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome

            Objectives: To study the effectiveness of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in the treatment of acute respiratory failure (ARF) in severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), and the associated infection risk. Methods: All patients with the diagnosis of probable SARS admitted to a regional hospital in Hong Kong from March 9 to April 28, 2003, and who had SARS-related respiratory distress complications were recruited for NIPPV usage. The health status of all health-care workers working in the NIPPV wards was closely monitored, and consent was obtained to check serum for coronavirus serology. Patient outcomes and the risk of SARS transmission to health-care workers were assessed. Results: NIPPV was applied to 20 patients (11 male patients) with ARF secondary to SARS. Mean age was 51.4 years, and mean acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score was 5.35. Coronavirus serology was positive in 95% (19 of 20 patients). NIPPV was started 9.6 days (mean) from symptom onset, and mean duration of NIPPV usage was 84.3 h. Endotracheal intubation was avoided in 14 patients (70%), in whom the length of ICU stay was shorter (3.1 days vs 21.3 days, p < 0.001) and the chest radiography score within 24 h of NIPPV was lower (15.1 vs 22.5, p = 0.005) compared to intubated patients. Intubation avoidance was predicted by a marked reduction in respiratory rate (9.2 breaths/min) and supplemental oxygen requirement (3.1 L/min) within 24 h of NIPPV. Complications were few and reversible. There were no infections among the 105 health-care workers caring for the patients receiving NIPPV. Conclusions: NIPPV was effective in the treatment of ARF in the patients with SARS studied, and its use was safe for health-care workers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Critical care delivery in the intensive care unit: defining clinical roles and the best practice model.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Chest
                Chest
                Chest
                American College of Chest Physicians
                0012-3692
                1931-3543
                16 December 2015
                May 2008
                16 December 2015
                : 133
                : 5
                : 32S-50S
                Affiliations
                [a ]University of Washington, Seattle, WA
                [b ]Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN
                [c ]Harbor View Medical Center, Seattle, WA
                [d ]University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
                [e ]University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
                [f ]Mount Sinai Hospital/University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
                [g ]Sharp Coronado Hospital, Coronado, CA
                [h ]Presbyterian Hospital, Albuquerque, NM
                [i ]Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
                [j ]University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
                [k ]American Association of Critical Care Nurses, Aliso Viejo, CA
                [l ]White River Junction VA Medical Center and Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH
                Author notes
                [* ]University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Campus Box 359762, 325 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98104 rubinson@ 123456u.washington.edu
                Article
                S0012-3692(15)32780-X
                10.1378/chest.07-2691
                7094478
                18460505
                f76c2867-403f-4917-b027-9b7be88e71fa
                © 2008 The American College of Chest Physicians

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 4 November 2007
                : 3 March 2008
                Categories
                Article

                Respiratory medicine
                disaster medicine,influenza pandemic,mass casualty medical care,medical surge capacity,cdc, centers for disease control and prevention,emcc, emergency mass critical care,imcu, intermediate care unit,nippv, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation,ppv, positive pressure ventilation,rt, respiratory therapist

                Comments

                Comment on this article