10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Combined Double-Pulley Remplissage and Bankart Repair

      brief-report
      , B.A. , , B.A., , B.A., , M.D., , M.D., , M.D., Ph.D., , M.D., , M.D., M.P.H.
      Arthroscopy Techniques
      Elsevier

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The use of arthroscopic Bankart repair to treat anterior shoulder instability has become increasingly widespread. However, high rates of recurrent instability within the presence of glenohumeral bony defects, specifically Hill-Sachs lesions, have well documented a key concern regarding the arthroscopic Bankart repair process. Our technique describes the pairing of a remplissage to fill the Hill-Sachs lesion with the Bankart repair, preventing loss in shoulder stiffness and stability. This technique involves a double-pulley-combined remplissage and Bankart repair to maintain a low-failure, minimally invasive procedure.

          Technique Video

          Video 1

          Double pulley combined remplissage and a Bankart repair. Patient is in the beach chair position with the abducted left shoulder and arm positioned using a Trimano limb positioner. Diagnostic arthroscopy showing a very large Hill-Sachs defect. From the view of the posterior portal, the Hill-Sachs defect is located, and a shaver is used to debride soft tissue for remplissage preparation. Percutaneous access is placed superolateral and posterolateral to the posterior portal for broad anchor placements of the 5.5-mm BioComposite corkscrews in the large Hill-Sachs defect using pilot hole tapping. Each anchor is loaded with a repair suture placed through separate capsular puncture holes through the same posterior portal. Switching to anterior portals, the surgeon uses a shaver to debride soft tissue for Bankart repair preparation. An Arthrex suture passer is used to pass large bites of 0-PDS around the Bankart and anterior capsular tissue. A no. 2 FiberWire is then tied to the passed end of the suture and shuttled around to luggage tag a stitch around the damaged labrum. A drill is used to create a pilot hole for the 2.9-mm BioComposite Arthrex PushLock anchor, into which the FiberWire is loaded. This process is repeated three times, taking large bites of the capsule and Bankart labrum to complete the Bankart repair. To complete the remplissage, the repair sutures from anchor 1 and the FiberWire sutures from anchor 2, located inferior and superior to the infraspinatus tendon, respectively, are retrieved and tied together in a parallel fashion. The repair sutures pulled through anchor 2 are then pulled to tighten them into the double pulley, reducing the infraspinatus into the Hill-Sachs defect. Several half hitches with a knot pusher are used to secure the reduction. Finally, an arthroscopic view of the reduction of the infraspinatus into the Hill-Sachs defect is shown.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion.

          Our goal was to analyze the results of 194 consecutive arthroscopic Bankart repairs (performed by 2 surgeons with an identical suture anchor technique) in order to identify specific factors related to recurrence of instability. Case series. We analyzed 194 consecutive arthroscopic Bankart repairs by suture anchor technique performed for traumatic anterior-inferior instability. The average follow-up was 27 months (range, 14 to 79 months). There were 101 contact athletes (96 South African rugby players and 5 American football players). We identified significant bone defects on either the humerus or the glenoid as (1) "inverted-pear" glenoid, in which the normally pear-shaped glenoid had lost enough anterior-inferior bone to assume the shape of an inverted pear; or (2) "engaging" Hill-Sachs lesion of the humerus, in which the orientation of the Hill-Sachs lesion was such that it engaged the anterior glenoid with the shoulder in abduction and external rotation. There were 21 recurrent dislocations and subluxations (14 dislocations, 7 subluxations). Of those 21 shoulders with recurrent instability, 14 had significant bone defects (3 engaging Hill-Sachs and 11 inverted-pear Bankart lesions). For the group of patients without significant bone defects (173 shoulders), there were 7 recurrences (4% recurrence rate). For the group with significant bone defects (21 patients), there were 14 recurrences (67% recurrence rate). For contact athletes without significant bone defects, there was a 6.5% recurrence rate, whereas for contact athletes with significant bone defects, there was an 89% recurrence rate. (1) Arthroscopic Bankart repairs give results equal to open Bankart repairs if there are no significant structural bone deficits (engaging Hill-Sachs or inverted-pear Bankart lesions). (2) Patients with significant bone deficits as defined in this study are not candidates for arthroscopic Bankart repair. (3) Contact athletes without structural bone deficits may be treated by arthroscopic Bankart repair. However, contact athletes with bone deficiency require open surgery aimed at their specific anatomic deficiencies. (4) For patients with significant glenoid bone loss, the surgeon should consider reconstruction by means of the Latarjet procedure, using a large coracoid bone graft.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Results of modified Latarjet reconstruction in patients with anteroinferior instability and significant bone loss.

            The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of the modified Latarjet procedure for shoulder instability associated with an inverted-pear glenoid (bone loss of at least 25% of the width of the inferior glenoid) or an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. From March 1996 to December 2002, 102 patients underwent an open Latarjet procedure for shoulder instability with an inverted-pear glenoid, with or without an associated engaging Hill-Sachs lesion, by the 2 senior authors (S.S.B. and J.F.D.), and 47 of them were available for follow-up physical examination. The remaining 55 patients were contacted by telephone or letter to see if they had had recurrent dislocation or subluxation. The mean age of the patients was 26.5 +/- 6.6 years (range, 16 to 41 years). There were 46 male patients and 1 female patient. Preoperatively, mean forward elevation was 177.2 degrees +/- 13.6 degrees (range, 90 degrees to 180 degrees) and mean external rotation with the arm at the side was 55.3 degrees +/- 16.1 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 80 degrees). All patients had a positive apprehension sign preoperatively. The median number of dislocations before surgery was 6, with 20 patients having had more than 15 dislocations preoperatively. The mean follow-up time for the 47 patients who were personally examined was 59.0 +/- 18.5 months (range, 32 to 108 months). Postoperatively, mean forward elevation was 179.6 degrees +/- 2.0 degrees (range, 170 degrees to 180 degrees; gain of 2.4 degrees) and external rotation with the arm at the side was 50.2 degrees +/- 12.6 degrees (range, 22 degrees to 78 degrees; loss of 5.1 degrees). As for postoperative functional scores, the mean Constant score was 94.4 and the mean Walch-Duplay score was 91.7. None of these 47 patients showed any further dislocation, and 1 of them still had a positive apprehension sign (2.2%) indicating subluxation. However, 4 patients out of the total 102 who underwent the modified Latarjet procedure had a recurrence. With 4 recurrent dislocations and 1 recurrent subluxation, there was a 4.9% recurrence rate. The 4 patients with recurrent dislocations were not among the 47 who returned for personal follow-up evaluation. The 2 senior authors (S.S.B. and J.F.D.) have previously reported an unacceptably high recurrence rate (67%) for arthroscopic Bankart repair in the presence of an inverted-pear glenoid with or without an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. They have recommended an open modified Latarjet procedure in such patients. The present study confirms the validity of that recommendation, because the same 2 surgeons have had only a 4.9% recurrence rate in that same category of patient at a mean follow-up of 59 months. Furthermore, the results of this study show the efficacy of the modified Latarjet procedure in the extremely challenging category of patients who present with such dramatic bone loss that soft-tissue reconstruction, either open or arthroscopic, is not a reasonable option. Level IV, therapeutic case series.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Hill-sachs "remplissage": an arthroscopic solution for the engaging hill-sachs lesion.

              We present an arthroscopic technique used to treat traumatic shoulder instability in patients with glenoid bone loss and a large Hill-Sachs lesion. The procedure consists of an arthroscopic capsulotenodesis of the posterior capsule and infraspinatus tendon to fill the Hill-Sachs lesion. With the patient in the lateral decubitus position, a posterior portal is established at the lateral aspect of the convexity of the humeral head that is centered over the lesion. After anterior-inferior and anterior-superior portals have been established, the camera is placed in the anterior-superior portal. The Hill-Sachs lesion is freshened with a bur through the posterior portal. A cannula is inserted in the posterior portal through the deltoid but not through the infraspinatus or capsule, and an anchor is placed in the inferior aspect of the humeral lesion. A penetrating grasper is passed through the tendon and posterior capsule, 1 cm inferior to the initial portal entry site to pull 1 suture limb. A second anchor is placed superiorly, and 1 suture limb is similarly passed. The inferior suture is tied first with the knots remaining extra-articular, pulling the infraspinatus and capsule into the lesion. After completion, the Bankart lesion can then be repaired.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Arthrosc Tech
                Arthrosc Tech
                Arthroscopy Techniques
                Elsevier
                2212-6287
                18 February 2022
                March 2022
                18 February 2022
                : 11
                : 3
                : e419-e425
                Affiliations
                [1]Advanced Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
                Author notes
                []Address correspondence to Dong Hyeon Kim, B.A., Advanced Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, 450 Sutter St., Ste. 400, San Francisco, CA, 94108, U.S.A. dhdkim0808@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S2212-6287(21)00326-1
                10.1016/j.eats.2021.11.011
                8897634
                35256986
                f784b957-eb94-4f3e-b57d-e5aa5e0d5772
                © 2021 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 31 August 2021
                : 14 November 2021
                Categories
                Technical Note

                Comments

                Comment on this article