1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Numerical Cognition in Action: Reaching Behavior Reveals Numerical Distance Effects in 5- to 6-Year-Olds

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study investigates how children’s numerical cognition is reflected in their unfolding actions. Five- and 6-year-olds (N = 34) completed a numerical comparison task by reaching to touch one of three rectangles arranged horizontally on a digital display. A number from 1 to 9 appeared in the center rectangle on each trial. Participants were instructed to touch the left rectangle for numbers 1-4, the center rectangle for 5, and the right rectangle for 6-9. Reach trajectories were more curved toward the center rectangle for numbers closer to 5 (e.g., 4) than numbers further from 5 (e.g., 1). This finding indicates that a tight coupling exists between numerical and spatial information in children’s cognition and action as early as the preschool years. In addition to shedding new light on the spatial representation of numbers during childhood, our results highlight the promise of incorporating measures of manual dynamics into developmental research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Grounded cognition.

          Grounded cognition rejects traditional views that cognition is computation on amodal symbols in a modular system, independent of the brain's modal systems for perception, action, and introspection. Instead, grounded cognition proposes that modal simulations, bodily states, and situated action underlie cognition. Accumulating behavioral and neural evidence supporting this view is reviewed from research on perception, memory, knowledge, language, thought, social cognition, and development. Theories of grounded cognition are also reviewed, as are origins of the area and common misperceptions of it. Theoretical, empirical, and methodological issues are raised whose future treatment is likely to affect the growth and impact of grounded cognition.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The mental representation of parity and number magnitude.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Core systems of number.

              What representations underlie the ability to think and reason about number? Whereas certain numerical concepts, such as the real numbers, are only ever represented by a subset of human adults, other numerical abilities are widespread and can be observed in adults, infants and other animal species. We review recent behavioral and neuropsychological evidence that these ontogenetically and phylogenetically shared abilities rest on two core systems for representing number. Performance signatures common across development and across species implicate one system for representing large, approximate numerical magnitudes, and a second system for the precise representation of small numbers of individual objects. These systems account for our basic numerical intuitions, and serve as the foundation for the more sophisticated numerical concepts that are uniquely human.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JNC
                J Numer Cogn
                Journal of Numerical Cognition
                J. Numer. Cogn.
                PsychOpen
                2363-8761
                07 September 2018
                2018
                : 4
                : 2
                : 286-296
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro , Greensboro, NC, USA
                [b ]Psychology Department, Connecticut College , New London, CT, USA
                [c ]Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University , Providence, RI, USA
                [4] University of Graz , Graz, Austria
                [5] University of Bern , Bern, Switzerland
                [6] Swiss Distance Learning University , Brig, Switzerland
                [7] Tarleton State University , Stephenville, TX, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 296 Eberhart Building, Greensboro, NC 27412, USA. Christopher.D.Erb@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                jnc.v4i2.122
                10.5964/jnc.v4i2.122
                f930a677-27ed-40d6-868c-4745f57f91a6
                Copyright @ 2018

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 30 March 2017
                : 18 June 2017
                Categories
                Special Thematic Section on "Tracking the Continuous Dynamics of Numerical Processing"

                Psychology
                spatial cognition,numerical distance effect (NDE),cognitive development,reach tracking

                Comments

                Comment on this article