9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Impact of Reverse Triggering Dyssynchrony during Lung-Protective Ventilation on Diaphragm Function: An Experimental Model

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p class="first" id="d2757702e261">Rationale: Reverse triggering dyssynchrony (RT) is a patient-ventilator interaction where a respiratory muscle contraction is triggered by a passive mechanical insufflation. Its impact on diaphragm structure and function is unknown. Objectives: To establish an animal model of RT with lung injury receiving lung-protective ventilation and to assess its impact on the structure and function of the diaphragm. Methods: Lung injury was induced by surfactant depletion and high-stress ventilation in 32 ventilated pigs. Animals were allocated to receive passive mechanical ventilation (Vt: 10 ml/kg; respiratory rate [RR]: 30-35 breaths/min; n = 8) or a more lung-protective strategy (Vt: 6-8 ml/kg; n = 24) with adjustments in RR to facilitate the occurrence of RT for 3 hours. Diaphragm function (transdiaphragmatic pressure [Pdi] during phrenic nerve stimulation [force/frequency curve]) and structure (biopsies) were assessed. The impact of RT on diaphragm function was analyzed according to the breathing effort assessed by the pressure-time product. Measurements and Main Results: Compared with passive ventilation, the protective ventilation group with RT received significantly lower Vt (7 vs. 10 ml/kg) and higher RR (45 vs. 31 breaths/min). An entrainment pattern of 1:1 was the most frequently occurring in 83% of the animals. Breathing effort induced by RT was highly variable across animals. RT with the lowest tercile of breathing effort was associated with 23% higher twitch Pdi compared with passive ventilation, whereas RT with high breathing effort was associated with a 10% lower twitch Pdi and a higher proportion of abnormal muscle fibers. Conclusions: In a reproducible animal model of RT with variable levels of breathing effort and entrainment patterns, RT with high effort is associated with impaired diaphragm function, whereas RT with low effort is associated with preserved diaphragm force. </p>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          Journal
          American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
          Am J Respir Crit Care Med
          American Thoracic Society
          1073-449X
          1535-4970
          March 15 2022
          March 15 2022
          : 205
          : 6
          : 663-673
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Translational Medicine Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;
          [2 ]Departamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Carrera de Kinesiología, and
          [3 ]Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile;
          [4 ]Neurointensive Care Unit, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda Ca’ Granda, Milan, Italy;
          [5 ]Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri;
          [6 ]Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine and
          [7 ]Department of Medicine, Division of Respirology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;
          [8 ]Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;
          [9 ]Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;
          [10 ]Departamento de Kinesiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile; and
          [11 ]Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;
          [12 ]Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
          Article
          10.1164/rccm.202105-1089OC
          34941477
          f95e64fa-386e-46e5-8bc0-27eba9203886
          © 2022
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article