375
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Transitory microbial habitat in the hyperarid Atacama Desert

      research-article
      a , b , 1 , c , d ,   e , f , g , h , i , j , k , l , m , n , o , p , a , c , a , q , r , s , t , t , n , u , v , w , l , l , x , y , z , a , aa , bb , a , r , q , f , e , q , z , bb , a , f , z , cc , k , t , z , dd , t
      Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
      National Academy of Sciences
      habitat, aridity, microbial activity, biomarker, Mars

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          It has remained an unresolved question whether microorganisms recovered from the most arid environments on Earth are thriving under such extreme conditions or are just dead or dying vestiges of viable cells fortuitously deposited by atmospheric processes. Based on multiple lines of evidence, we show that indigenous microbial communities are present and temporally active even in the hyperarid soils of the Atacama Desert (Chile). Following extremely rare precipitation events in the driest parts of this desert, where rainfall often occurs only once per decade, we were able to detect episodic incidences of biological activity. Our findings expand the range of hyperarid environments temporarily habitable for terrestrial life, which by extension also applies to other planetary bodies like Mars.

          Abstract

          Traces of life are nearly ubiquitous on Earth. However, a central unresolved question is whether these traces always indicate an active microbial community or whether, in extreme environments, such as hyperarid deserts, they instead reflect just dormant or dead cells. Although microbial biomass and diversity decrease with increasing aridity in the Atacama Desert, we provide multiple lines of evidence for the presence of an at times metabolically active, microbial community in one of the driest places on Earth. We base this observation on four major lines of evidence: ( i) a physico-chemical characterization of the soil habitability after an exceptional rain event, ( ii) identified biomolecules indicative of potentially active cells [e.g., presence of ATP, phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs), metabolites, and enzymatic activity], ( iii) measurements of in situ replication rates of genomes of uncultivated bacteria reconstructed from selected samples, and ( iv) microbial community patterns specific to soil parameters and depths. We infer that the microbial populations have undergone selection and adaptation in response to their specific soil microenvironment and in particular to the degree of aridity. Collectively, our results highlight that even the hyperarid Atacama Desert can provide a habitable environment for microorganisms that allows them to become metabolically active following an episodic increase in moisture and that once it decreases, so does the activity of the microbiota. These results have implications for the prospect of life on other planets such as Mars, which has transitioned from an earlier wetter environment to today’s extreme hyperaridity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Community structure and metabolism through reconstruction of microbial genomes from the environment.

          Microbial communities are vital in the functioning of all ecosystems; however, most microorganisms are uncultivated, and their roles in natural systems are unclear. Here, using random shotgun sequencing of DNA from a natural acidophilic biofilm, we report reconstruction of near-complete genomes of Leptospirillum group II and Ferroplasma type II, and partial recovery of three other genomes. This was possible because the biofilm was dominated by a small number of species populations and the frequency of genomic rearrangements and gene insertions or deletions was relatively low. Because each sequence read came from a different individual, we could determine that single-nucleotide polymorphisms are the predominant form of heterogeneity at the strain level. The Leptospirillum group II genome had remarkably few nucleotide polymorphisms, despite the existence of low-abundance variants. The Ferroplasma type II genome seems to be a composite from three ancestral strains that have undergone homologous recombination to form a large population of mosaic genomes. Analysis of the gene complement for each organism revealed the pathways for carbon and nitrogen fixation and energy generation, and provided insights into survival strategies in an extreme environment.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Examining the global distribution of dominant archaeal populations in soil.

            Archaea, primarily Crenarchaeota, are common in soil; however, the structure of soil archaeal communities and the factors regulating their diversity and abundance remain poorly understood. Here, we used barcoded pyrosequencing to comprehensively survey archaeal and bacterial communities in 146 soils, representing a multitude of soil and ecosystem types from across the globe. Relative archaeal abundance, the percentage of all 16S rRNA gene sequences recovered that were archaeal, averaged 2% across all soils and ranged from 0% to >10% in individual soils. Soil C:N ratio was the only factor consistently correlated with archaeal relative abundances, being higher in soils with lower C:N ratios. Soil archaea communities were dominated by just two phylotypes from a constrained clade within the Crenarchaeota, which together accounted for >70% of all archaeal sequences obtained in the survey. As one of these phylotypes was closely related to a previously identified putative ammonia oxidizer, we sampled from two long-term nitrogen (N) addition experiments to determine if this taxon responds to experimental manipulations of N availability. Contrary to expectations, the abundance of this dominant taxon, as well as archaea overall, tended to decline with increasing N. This trend was coupled with a concurrent increase in known N-oxidizing bacteria, suggesting competitive interactions between these groups.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Evidence for recent groundwater seepage and surface runoff on Mars.

              Relatively young landforms on Mars, seen in high-resolution images acquired by the Mars Global Surveyor Mars Orbiter Camera since March 1999, suggest the presence of sources of liquid water at shallow depths beneath the martian surface. Found at middle and high martian latitudes (particularly in the southern hemisphere), gullies within the walls of a very small number of impact craters, south polar pits, and two of the larger martian valleys display geomorphic features that can be explained by processes associated with groundwater seepage and surface runoff. The relative youth of the landforms is indicated by the superposition of the gullies on otherwise geologically young surfaces and by the absence of superimposed landforms or cross-cutting features, including impact craters, small polygons, and eolian dunes. The limited size and geographic distribution of the features argue for constrained source reservoirs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A
                pnas
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                13 March 2018
                26 February 2018
                26 February 2018
                : 115
                : 11
                : 2670-2675
                Affiliations
                [1] aCenter of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Technical University Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany;
                [2] bSchool of the Environment, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164;
                [3] cSection Geomicrobiology, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, 14473 Potsdam, Germany;
                [4] dInstitute of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam, Germany;
                [5] eDepartment of Chemistry, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02153;
                [6] fDepartment of Earth Science & Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW72AZ, United Kingdom;
                [7] gSection Organic Geochemistry, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, 14473 Potsdam, Germany;
                [8] hSchool of Human Sciences, London Metropolitan University, London N7 8BD, United Kingdom;
                [9] iAstrobiological Laboratories, Management and Infrastructure, Institute for Planetary Research, German Aerospace Center, 12489 Berlin, Germany;
                [10] jAnalytical Food Chemistry, Technical University München, 85354 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany;
                [11] kAnalytical BioGeoChemistry, Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany;
                [12] lDepartment of Experimental Limnology, Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, 16775 Stechlin, Germany;
                [13] mInstitute of Biochemistry & Biology, University of Potsdam, 14476 Potsdam, Germany;
                [14] nMolecular Evolution Department, Centro de Astrobiología, Instituto Nacional de Técnica Aeroespacial-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (INTA-CSIC), 28850 Madrid, Spain;
                [15] oFachgebiet Bodenkunde, Technical University Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany;
                [16] pCentre de Recherches Pétrographiques et Géochimiques, CNRS, Université de Lorraine, 54500 Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France;
                [17] qBiofilm Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45141 Essen, Germany;
                [18] rPlanetary Systems Branch (Code SST), NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035;
                [19] sInstitute for Geological Sciences, Freie University Berlin, 12249 Berlin, Germany;
                [20] tLaboratorio de Microorganismos Extremófilos, University of Antofagasta, Antofagasta 02800, Chile;
                [21] uDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Westminster, London W1W 6UW, United Kingdom;
                [22] vDepartment of Biology, The John Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218;
                [23] wDepartment of Crop & Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164;
                [24] xDepartment of Ecology, Technical University Berlin, 10587 Berlin, Germany;
                [25] yCenter for Applied Geosciences, University of Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany;
                [26] zComparative Microbiome Analysis, Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany;
                [27] aaSystems Microbiology & Natural Products Laboratory, University of California, Davis, CA 95616;
                [28] bbInstitute of Earth Sciences, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
                [29] ccSoil Science, Technical University München, 85354 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany;
                [30] ddCenter for Marine Environmental Sciences (MARUM), University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany
                Author notes
                1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: schulze-makuch@ 123456tu-berlin.de .

                Edited by Mary K. Firestone, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved January 25, 2018 (received for review August 17, 2017)

                Author contributions: D.S.-M. designed research; D.S.-M., D.W., S.P.K., K.M., K.G.D., J.-P.d.V., P.S.-K., H.-P.G., V.P., A.G., B.S., A.A., J.F., A.F.D., F.L.A., L.C., F.S.C., D.C., L.D., J.D., M.F., L. Ganzert, M.O.G., P.G., L. Guan, J.H., M.H., F.K., D.M., R.U.M., W.M., E.A.O., A.J.P., J.S.S., T.S., J.S., M.A.S., M.S., J.U., B.V., G.V., L.W., and P.Z. performed research; D.W., S.P.K., K.M., K.G.D., P.S.-K., H.-P.G., V.P., M.K., A.G., M.O.G., P.G., F.K., R.U.M., A.J.P., M.S., G.V., and L.W. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; D.S.-M., D.W., S.P.K., K.M., K.G.D., J.-P.d.V., P.S.-K., H.-P.G., V.P., M.K., A.G., B.S., A.A., J.F., A.F.D., F.L.A., L.D., J.D., M.F., L. Ganzert, M.O.G., P.G., M.H., F.K., C.P.M., R.U.M., A.J.P., J.S., M.S., J.U., B.V., G.V., and L.W. analyzed data; and D.S.-M., D.W., S.P.K., H.-P.G., and M.S. wrote the paper.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2629-4831
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0824-2664
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9141-0325
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3344-3962
                Article
                201714341
                10.1073/pnas.1714341115
                5856521
                29483268
                f9ee8161-ee9c-4ebe-8367-e8e1454b31e1
                Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 6
                Funding
                Funded by: EC |H2020 |H2020 Priority Excellent Science |H2020 European Research Council (ERC) 100010663
                Award ID: 339231
                Categories
                Physical Sciences
                Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
                Biological Sciences
                Ecology

                habitat,aridity,microbial activity,biomarker,mars
                habitat, aridity, microbial activity, biomarker, mars

                Comments

                Comment on this article