35
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An electrostatic mechanism for Ca 2+-mediated regulation of gap junction channels

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Gap junction channels mediate intercellular signalling that is crucial in tissue development, homeostasis and pathologic states such as cardiac arrhythmias, cancer and trauma. To explore the mechanism by which Ca 2+ blocks intercellular communication during tissue injury, we determined the X-ray crystal structures of the human Cx26 gap junction channel with and without bound Ca 2+. The two structures were nearly identical, ruling out both a large-scale structural change and a local steric constriction of the pore. Ca 2+ coordination sites reside at the interfaces between adjacent subunits, near the entrance to the extracellular gap, where local, side chain conformational rearrangements enable Ca 2+chelation. Computational analysis revealed that Ca 2+-binding generates a positive electrostatic barrier that substantially inhibits permeation of cations such as K + into the pore. Our results provide structural evidence for a unique mechanism of channel regulation: ionic conduction block via an electrostatic barrier rather than steric occlusion of the channel pore.

          Abstract

          Intercellular signalling can be mediated by gap junction channels, and calcium blocks this signally during tissue injury. Here, the authors use X-ray crystallography and molecular dynamics to show that the calcium forms an electrostatic barrier to prevent transport of cations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Linking crystallographic model and data quality.

          In macromolecular x-ray crystallography, refinement R values measure the agreement between observed and calculated data. Analogously, R(merge) values reporting on the agreement between multiple measurements of a given reflection are used to assess data quality. Here, we show that despite their widespread use, R(merge) values are poorly suited for determining the high-resolution limit and that current standard protocols discard much useful data. We introduce a statistic that estimates the correlation of an observed data set with the underlying (not measurable) true signal; this quantity, CC*, provides a single statistically valid guide for deciding which data are useful. CC* also can be used to assess model and data quality on the same scale, and this reveals when data quality is limiting model improvement.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Structure of the connexin 26 gap junction channel at 3.5 A resolution.

            Gap junctions consist of arrays of intercellular channels between adjacent cells that permit the exchange of ions and small molecules. Here we report the crystal structure of the gap junction channel formed by human connexin 26 (Cx26, also known as GJB2) at 3.5 A resolution, and discuss structural determinants of solute transport through the channel. The density map showed the two membrane-spanning hemichannels and the arrangement of the four transmembrane helices of the six protomers forming each hemichannel. The hemichannels feature a positively charged cytoplasmic entrance, a funnel, a negatively charged transmembrane pathway, and an extracellular cavity. The pore is narrowed at the funnel, which is formed by the six amino-terminal helices lining the wall of the channel, which thus determines the molecular size restriction at the channel entrance. The structure of the Cx26 gap junction channel also has implications for the gating of the channel by the transjunctional voltage.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Connexin channel permeability to cytoplasmic molecules.

              Connexin channels are known to be permeable to a variety of cytoplasmic molecules. The first observation of second messenger junctional permeability, made approximately 30 years ago, sparked broad interest in gap junction channels as mediators of intercellular molecular signaling. Since then, much has been learned about the diversity of connexin channels with regard to isoform diversity, tissue and developmental distribution, modes of channel regulation, assembly, expression, biochemical modification and permeability, all of which appear to be dynamically regulated. This information has expanded the potential roles of connexin channels in development, physiology and disease, and made their elucidation much more complex--30 years ago such an orchestra of junctional dynamics was unanticipated. Only recently, however, have investigators been able to directly address, in this more complex framework, the key issue: what specific biological molecules, second messengers and others, are able to permeate the various types of connexin channels, and how well? An important related issue, given the ever-growing list of connexin-related pathologies, is how these permeabilities are altered by disease-causing connexin mutations. Together, many studies show that a variety of cytoplasmic molecules can permeate the different types of connexin channels. A few studies reveal differences in permeation by different molecules through a particular type of connexin channel, and differences in permeation by a particular molecule through different types of connexin channels. This article describes and evaluates the various methods used to obtain these data, presents an annotated compilation of the results, and discusses the findings in the context of what can be inferred about mechanism of selectivity and potential relevance to signaling. The data strongly suggest that highly specific interactions take place between connexin pores and specific biological molecular permeants, and that those interactions determine which cytoplasmic molecules can permeate and how well. At this time, the nature of those interactions is unclear. One hopes that with more detailed permeability and structural information, the specific molecular mechanisms of the selectivity can be elucidated.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Publishing Group
                2041-1723
                12 January 2016
                2016
                : 7
                : 8770
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia School of Medicine , Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA
                [2 ]Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute , La Jolla, California 92037, USA
                [3 ]Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California at San Diego , La Jolla, California 92093, USA
                [4 ]Department of Pharmacology, University of Virginia School of Medicine , Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA
                [5 ]Departments of Biological Sciences and Chemistry, Bridge Institute, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, California 90089, USA
                [6 ]Department of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute , La Jolla, California 92037, USA
                [7 ]Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Neuroscience, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School , Newark, New Jersey 07103, USA
                [8 ]Center for Membrane Biology, University of Virginia School of Medicine , Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA
                [9 ]Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia School of Medicine , Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA
                [10 ]Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine , Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA
                Author notes
                [*]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                [†]

                Present address: Department of Biology and Environmental Sciences, Samford University, Birmingham, Alabama 35209, USA.

                Article
                ncomms9770
                10.1038/ncomms9770
                4730032
                26753910
                fa62dff7-ebdf-4dcb-a57f-7a68e1c51b97
                Copyright © 2016, Nature Publishing Group, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited. All Rights Reserved.

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 01 April 2015
                : 01 October 2015
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article