68
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Paleogenomic Evidence for Multi-generational Mixing between Neolithic Farmers and Mesolithic Hunter-Gatherers in the Lower Danube Basin

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          The transition from hunting and gathering to farming involved profound cultural and technological changes. In Western and Central Europe, these changes occurred rapidly and synchronously after the arrival of early farmers of Anatolian origin [ 1, 2, 3], who largely replaced the local Mesolithic hunter-gatherers [ 1, 4, 5, 6]. Further east, in the Baltic region, the transition was gradual, with little or no genetic input from incoming farmers [ 7]. Here we use ancient DNA to investigate the relationship between hunter-gatherers and farmers in the Lower Danube basin, a geographically intermediate area that is characterized by a rapid Neolithic transition but also by the presence of archaeological evidence that points to cultural exchange, and thus possible admixture, between hunter-gatherers and farmers. We recovered four human paleogenomes (1.1× to 4.1× coverage) from Romania spanning a time transect between 8.8 thousand years ago (kya) and 5.4 kya and supplemented them with two Mesolithic genomes (1.7× and 5.3×) from Spain to provide further context on the genetic background of Mesolithic Europe. Our results show major Western hunter-gatherer (WHG) ancestry in a Romanian Eneolithic sample with a minor, but sizeable, contribution from Anatolian farmers, suggesting multiple admixture events between hunter-gatherers and farmers. Dietary stable-isotope analysis of this sample suggests a mixed terrestrial/aquatic diet. Our results provide support for complex interactions among hunter-gatherers and farmers in the Danube basin, demonstrating that in some regions, demic and cultural diffusion were not mutually exclusive, but merely the ends of a continuum for the process of Neolithization.

          Highlights

          • Demic and cultural diffusions underlie the Neolithic period in the Danube basin

          • A large WHG genome component was present in Eneolithic communities in this region

          • The further east in Europe, the weaker the genetic component of Anatolian farmers

          • Environmental factors may account for a demic diffusion breakdown in these regions

          Abstract

          A key question in archaeological research is whether the transition from hunting and gathering was more reliant on the movement of people or ideas. González-Fortes et al. show, based on genomes of several ancient humans, that in parts of Romania, it was actually a mix of both processes that took place during this so-called Neolithization process.

          Related collections

          Most cited references71

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A high-coverage genome sequence from an archaic Denisovan individual.

          We present a DNA library preparation method that has allowed us to reconstruct a high-coverage (30×) genome sequence of a Denisovan, an extinct relative of Neandertals. The quality of this genome allows a direct estimation of Denisovan heterozygosity indicating that genetic diversity in these archaic hominins was extremely low. It also allows tentative dating of the specimen on the basis of "missing evolution" in its genome, detailed measurements of Denisovan and Neandertal admixture into present-day human populations, and the generation of a near-complete catalog of genetic changes that swept to high frequency in modern humans since their divergence from Denisovans.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans

            We sequenced genomes from a $\sim$7,000 year old early farmer from Stuttgart in Germany, an $\sim$8,000 year old hunter-gatherer from Luxembourg, and seven $\sim$8,000 year old hunter-gatherers from southern Sweden. We analyzed these data together with other ancient genomes and 2,345 contemporary humans to show that the great majority of present-day Europeans derive from at least three highly differentiated populations: West European Hunter-Gatherers (WHG), who contributed ancestry to all Europeans but not to Near Easterners; Ancient North Eurasians (ANE), who were most closely related to Upper Paleolithic Siberians and contributed to both Europeans and Near Easterners; and Early European Farmers (EEF), who were mainly of Near Eastern origin but also harbored WHG-related ancestry. We model these populations' deep relationships and show that EEF had $\sim$44% ancestry from a "Basal Eurasian" lineage that split prior to the diversification of all other non-African lineages.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Preparation and characterization of bone and tooth collagen for isotopic analysis

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Curr Biol
                Curr. Biol
                Current Biology
                Cell Press
                0960-9822
                1879-0445
                19 June 2017
                19 June 2017
                : 27
                : 12
                : 1801-1810.e10
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, Via L. Borsari 46, Ferrara 44100, Italy
                [2 ]Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 24-25, 14476 Potsdam OT Golm, Germany
                [3 ]Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
                [4 ]McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3ER, UK
                [5 ]School of History, Classics and Archaeology, University of Edinburgh, William Robertson Wing, Old Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK
                [6 ]National History Museum of Romania, Bucharest 030026, Romania
                [7 ]Instituto Universitario de Xeoloxía, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña 15081, Spain
                [8 ]Department of Zoology and Physical Anthropology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain
                [9 ]“Olga Necrasov” Centre for Anthropological Research of the Romanian Academy, Iaşi Branch, Theodor Codrescu Strada 2, 700481 Iaşi, Romania
                [10 ]“Vasile Pârvan” Institute of Archaeology, Romanian Academy, Henri Coandă Strada 11, Bucharest 010667, Romania
                [11 ]International Institute of Prehistorical Research, University of Cantabria-Government of Cantabria-Bank of Santander, Santander 39005, Spain
                [12 ]School of Archaeology and Earth Institute, Belfield, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
                [13 ]Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author gnzgrm@ 123456unife.it
                [∗∗ ]Corresponding author erj35@ 123456cam.ac.uk
                [∗∗∗ ]Corresponding author ron.pinhasi@ 123456ucd.ie
                [∗∗∗∗ ]Corresponding author am315@ 123456cam.ac.uk
                [∗∗∗∗∗ ]Corresponding author michi@ 123456palaeo.eu
                [14]

                These authors contributed equally

                [15]

                Lead Contact

                Article
                S0960-9822(17)30559-6
                10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.023
                5483232
                28552360
                fabe54e2-f5e6-4962-8d13-7a7b0648be0d
                © 2017 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 28 February 2017
                : 21 April 2017
                : 4 May 2017
                Categories
                Report

                Life sciences
                ancient dna,eneolithic,neolithic transition,romania,iron gates,mesolithic
                Life sciences
                ancient dna, eneolithic, neolithic transition, romania, iron gates, mesolithic

                Comments

                Comment on this article