82
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A qualitative systematic review of studies using the normalization process theory to research implementation processes

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          There is a well-recognized need for greater use of theory to address research translational gaps. Normalization Process Theory (NPT) provides a set of sociological tools to understand and explain the social processes through which new or modified practices of thinking, enacting, and organizing work are implemented, embedded, and integrated in healthcare and other organizational settings. This review of NPT offers readers the opportunity to observe how, and in what areas, a particular theoretical approach to implementation is being used. In this article we review the literature on NPT in order to understand what interventions NPT is being used to analyze, how NPT is being operationalized, and the reported benefits, if any, of using NPT.

          Methods

          Using a framework analysis approach, we conducted a qualitative systematic review of peer-reviewed literature using NPT. We searched 12 electronic databases and all citations linked to six key NPT development papers. Grey literature/unpublished studies were not sought. Limitations of English language, healthcare setting and year of publication 2006 to June 2012 were set.

          Results

          Twenty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria; in the main, NPT is being applied to qualitatively analyze a diverse range of complex interventions, many beyond its original field of e-health and telehealth. The NPT constructs have high stability across settings and, notwithstanding challenges in applying NPT in terms of managing overlaps between constructs, there is evidence that it is a beneficial heuristic device to explain and guide implementation processes.

          Conclusions

          NPT offers a generalizable framework that can be applied across contexts with opportunities for incremental knowledge gain over time and an explicit framework for analysis, which can explain and potentially shape implementation processes. This is the first review of NPT in use and it generates an impetus for further and extended use of NPT. We recommend that in future NPT research, authors should explicate their rationale for choosing NPT as their theoretical framework and, where possible, involve multiple stakeholders including service users to enable analysis of implementation from a range of perspectives.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The meaning of translational research and why it matters.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Knowledge transfer for the management of dementia: a cluster-randomised trial of blended learning in general practice

            Background The implementation of new medical knowledge into general practice is a complex process. Blended learning may offer an effective and efficient educational intervention to reduce the knowledge-to-practice gap. The aim of this study was to compare knowledge acquisition about dementia management between a blended learning approach using online modules in addition to quality circles (QCs) and QCs alone. Methods In this cluster-randomised trial with QCs as clusters and general practitioners (GPs) as participants, 389 GPs from 26 QCs in the western part of Germany were invited to participate. Data on the GPs' knowledge were obtained at three points in time by means of a questionnaire survey. Primary outcome was the knowledge gain before and after the interventions. A subgroup analysis of the users of the online modules was performed. Results 166 GPs were available for analysis and filled out a knowledge test at least two times. A significant increase of knowledge was found in both groups that indicated positive learning effects of both approaches. However, there was no significant difference between the groups. A subgroup analysis of the GPs who self-reported that they had actually used the online modules showed that they had a significant increase in their knowledge scores. Conclusion A blended learning approach was not superior to a QCs approach for improving knowledge about dementia management. However, a subgroup of GPs who were motivated to actually use the online modules had a gain in knowledge. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN36550981.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Analyzing Qualitative Data

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Implement Sci
                Implement Sci
                Implementation Science : IS
                BioMed Central
                1748-5908
                2014
                2 January 2014
                : 9
                : 2
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Graduate Entry Medical School, 4i Research Center, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
                [2 ]Responsabile di Area, Osservatorio Regionale per l’Innovazione (ORI), Agenzia sanitaria e sociale regionale, viale Aldo Moro 21-40127, Bologna, Italy
                [3 ]General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, MVLS. University of Glasgow, 1 Horselethill Road, G12 9LX, Glasgow, Scotland
                Article
                1748-5908-9-2
                10.1186/1748-5908-9-2
                3905960
                24383661
                fac77454-a1cb-40b3-a311-5250575dfc9d
                Copyright © 2014 McEvoy et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 13 May 2013
                : 3 December 2013
                Categories
                Systematic Review

                Medicine
                policy,translational gaps,implementation,theory,normalization process theory
                Medicine
                policy, translational gaps, implementation, theory, normalization process theory

                Comments

                Comment on this article