4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A framework for quantifying the coupling between brain connectivity and heartbeat dynamics: Insights into the disrupted network physiology in Parkinson's disease

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Parkinson's disease (PD) often shows disrupted brain connectivity and autonomic dysfunctions, progressing alongside with motor and cognitive decline. Recently, PD has been linked to a reduced sensitivity to cardiac inputs, that is, cardiac interoception. Altogether, those signs suggest that PD causes an altered brain–heart connection whose mechanisms remain unclear. Our study aimed to explore the large‐scale network disruptions and the neurophysiology of disrupted interoceptive mechanisms in PD. We focused on examining the alterations in brain–heart coupling in PD and their potential connection to motor symptoms. We developed a proof‐of‐concept method to quantify relationships between the co‐fluctuations of brain connectivity and cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic activities. We quantified the brain–heart couplings from electroencephalogram and electrocardiogram recordings from PD patients on and off dopaminergic medication, as well as in healthy individuals at rest. Our results show that the couplings of fluctuating alpha and gamma connectivity with cardiac sympathetic dynamics are reduced in PD patients, as compared to healthy individuals. Furthermore, we show that PD patients under dopamine medication recover part of the brain–heart coupling, in proportion with the reduced motor symptoms. Our proposal offers a promising approach to unveil the physiopathology of PD and promoting the development of new evaluation methods for the early stages of the disease.

          Abstract

          We propose a new framework to measure brain–heart interactions. The methodological pipeline consists in: (a) Computation of time‐varying electroencephalogram (EEG) power at different frequency bands (α, β, γ) and (b) the estimation of time‐varying connectivity between two EEG channels. (c) Computation of the heart rate variability series from electrocardiogram and the estimation of cardiac sympathetic‐parasympathetic activity. (d) Brain connectivity‐cardiac coupling estimation by computing the Maximal Information Coefficient (MIC). The coupling quantification is achieved by assessing the similarities between two time series, regardless of the curvature of the signals. The MIC method evaluates similarities between distinct segments individually, using an adjusted grid as depicted in the figure. The overall measure combines the similarities observed throughout the entire time‐course. A network cluster permutation pipeline is applied to the connections coupled with cardiac activity. These connections are grouped based on their neighboring definition. Then, the identified clusters undergo a permutation test. This process ultimately defines the networks whose coupling with cardiac activity changes under the experimental conditions being tested.

          Related collections

          Most cited references86

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data.

          In this paper, we show how ElectroEncephaloGraphic (EEG) and MagnetoEncephaloGraphic (MEG) data can be analyzed statistically using nonparametric techniques. Nonparametric statistical tests offer complete freedom to the user with respect to the test statistic by means of which the experimental conditions are compared. This freedom provides a straightforward way to solve the multiple comparisons problem (MCP) and it allows to incorporate biophysically motivated constraints in the test statistic, which may drastically increase the sensitivity of the statistical test. The paper is written for two audiences: (1) empirical neuroscientists looking for the most appropriate data analysis method, and (2) methodologists interested in the theoretical concepts behind nonparametric statistical tests. For the empirical neuroscientist, a large part of the paper is written in a tutorial-like fashion, enabling neuroscientists to construct their own statistical test, maximizing the sensitivity to the expected effect. And for the methodologist, it is explained why the nonparametric test is formally correct. This means that we formulate a null hypothesis (identical probability distribution in the different experimental conditions) and show that the nonparametric test controls the false alarm rate under this null hypothesis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Non-motor features of Parkinson disease

            Parkinson disease is often characterized as a disorder of movement; however, it is also associated with many non-motor features, some of which appear early in the disease course. In this article, Schapira and colleagues provide an overview of these diverse features and their neurobiological basis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Knowing your own heart: distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness.

              Interoception refers to the sensing of internal bodily changes. Interoception interacts with cognition and emotion, making measurement of individual differences in interoceptive ability broadly relevant to neuropsychology. However, inconsistency in how interoception is defined and quantified led to a three-dimensional model. Here, we provide empirical support for dissociation between dimensions of: (1) interoceptive accuracy (performance on objective behavioural tests of heartbeat detection), (2) interoceptive sensibility (self-evaluated assessment of subjective interoception, gauged using interviews/questionnaires) and (3) interoceptive awareness (metacognitive awareness of interoceptive accuracy, e.g. confidence-accuracy correspondence). In a normative sample (N=80), all three dimensions were distinct and dissociable. Interoceptive accuracy was only partly predicted by interoceptive awareness and interoceptive sensibility. Significant correspondence between dimensions emerged only within the sub-group of individuals with greatest interoceptive accuracy. These findings set the context for defining how the relative balance of accuracy, sensibility and awareness dimensions explain cognitive, emotional and clinical associations of interoceptive ability.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                diego.candia.r@ug.uchile.cl
                Journal
                Hum Brain Mapp
                Hum Brain Mapp
                10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0193
                HBM
                Human Brain Mapping
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                1065-9471
                1097-0193
                23 March 2024
                April 2024
                : 45
                : 5 ( doiID: 10.1002/hbm.v45.5 )
                : e26668
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Sorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), Inria Paris, CNRS UMR7225, INSERM U1127, AP‐HP Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtrière Paris France
                [ 2 ] Sorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute (ICM)—Team “Movement Investigations and Therapeutics” (MOV'IT), CNRS UMR7225, INSERM U1127, AP‐HP Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtrière Paris France
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Diego Candia‐Rivera, Sorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute (ICM), Inria Paris, CNRS UMR7225, INSERM U1127, AP‐HP Hôpital Pitié‐Salpêtrière, Paris F75013, France.

                Email: diego.candia.r@ 123456ug.uchile.cl

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4043-217X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2409-9143
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0390-4833
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8035-7883
                Article
                HBM26668
                10.1002/hbm.26668
                10960553
                38520378
                fdac9964-034f-4086-81d0-c33a3ad8b792
                © 2024 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 07 March 2024
                : 04 October 2023
                : 12 March 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 2, Pages: 14, Words: 11166
                Funding
                Funded by: Agence Nationale de la Recherche , doi 10.13039/501100001665;
                Award ID: ANR‐20‐CE37‐0012‐03
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                April 2024
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.3.9 mode:remove_FC converted:23.03.2024

                Neurology
                brain–heart interaction,dopamine,interoception,network physiology,parkinson's disease
                Neurology
                brain–heart interaction, dopamine, interoception, network physiology, parkinson's disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article