16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Effect of Different Recovery Duration on Repeated Anaerobic Performance in Elite Cyclists

      research-article
      1
      Journal of Human Kinetics
      Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Katowicach
      repeated Wingate test, recovery, anaerobic power

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study investigated the effect of recovery duration on repeated anaerobic performance in elite cyclists. The study followed a cross-over design protocol. Twelve elite male cyclists were randomly assigned to three groups (with recovery duration of 1, 2 and 3 min, respectively). All the subjects performed 4 repeated Wingate tests (4 × 30 s WT) at 48 h intervals for three different recovery periods. No significant interaction was observed between the effects of recovery duration and repetition (p>0.05), whereas there was a significant main effect of repetition on peak power, mean power, and a fatigue index (p<0.05). Peak power decreased significantly in repeated WTs with 1 and with 2 min recovery duration (p<0.05), but it did not change significantly in a repeated WT with 3 min recovery (p>0.05). In contrast, mean power decreased significantly in repeated WTs with 1, 2 and 3 min recovery duration (p<0.05). The fatigue index increased significantly in a repeated WT with 1 min recovery duration (p<0.05), but no significant difference was observed in the fatigue index in repeated WTs with 2 and 3 min recovery (p>0.05). In a 4 × 30 s WT, peak power decreased in cycles with 1 and 2 min recovery duration, but remained unchanged with 3 min recovery duration, whereas mean power decreased in all recovery duration procedures. The WT with 1 min recovery duration caused greater fatigue. Although recovery duration affected both peak power and mean power, the effect on peak power was greater.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Wingate anaerobic test. An update on methodology, reliability and validity.

          O. Bar-Or (1987)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The time course of phosphorylcreatine resynthesis during recovery of the quadriceps muscle in man.

            The time course of phosphorylcreatine (PC) resynthesis in the human m. quadriceps femoris was studied during recovery from exhaustive dynamic exercise and from isometric contraction sustained to fatigue. The immediate postexercise muscle PC content after either form of exercise was 15-16% of the resting muscle content. The time course of PC resynthesis during recovery was biphasic exhibiting a fast and slow recovery component. The half-time for the fast component was 21-22s but this accounted for a smaller fraction of the total PC restored during recovery from the isometric contraction than after the dynamic exercise. The half-time for the slow component was in each case more than 170 s. After 2 and 4 min recovery the total amount of PC resynthesized after the isometric exercise were significantly lower than from the dynamic exercise. Occlusion of the circulation of the quadriceps completely abolished the resynthesis of PC. Restoration of resynthesis occurred only after release of occlusion.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Recovery of power output and muscle metabolites following 30 s of maximal sprint cycling in man.

              1. The recovery of power output and muscle metabolites was examined following maximal sprint cycling exercise. Fourteen male subjects performed two 30 s cycle ergometer sprints separated by 1.5, 3 and 6 min of recovery, on three separate occasions. On a fourth occasion eight of the subjects performed only one 30 s sprint and muscle biopsies were obtained during recovery. 2. At the end of the 30 s sprint phosphocreatine (PCr) and ATP contents were 19.7 +/- 1.2 and 70.5 +/- 6.5% of the resting values (rest), respectively, while muscle lactate was 119.0 +/- 4.6 mmol (kg dry wt)-1 and muscle pH was 6.72 +/- 0.06. During recovery, PCr increased rapidly to 65.0 +/- 2.8% of rest after 1.5 min, but reached only 85.5 +/- 3.5% of rest after 6 min of recovery. At the same time ATP and muscle pH remained low (19.5 +/- 0.9 mmol (kg dry wt)-1 and 6.79 +/- 0.02, respectively). Modelling of the individual PCr resynthesis using a power function curve gave an average half-time for PCr resynthesis of 56.6 +/- 7.3 s. 3. Recovery of peak power output (PPO), peak pedal speed (maxSp) and mean power during the initial 6 s (MPO6) of sprint 2 did not reach the control values after 6 min of rest, and occurred in parallel with the resynthesis of PCr, despite the low muscle pH. High correlations (r = 0.71-0.86; P 0.05). 4. These data suggest that PCr resynthesis after 30 s of maximal sprint exercise is slower than previously observed after dynamic exercise of longer duration, and PCr resynthesis is important for the recovery of power during repeated bouts of sprint exercise.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Hum Kinet
                J Hum Kinet
                JHK
                Journal of Human Kinetics
                Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Katowicach
                1640-5544
                1899-7562
                22 December 2015
                30 December 2015
                : 49
                : 171-178
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Selçuk University, School of Physical Education and Sports, Alaeddin Keykubat Campus, 42003, Konya, Turkey
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Sultan Harbili, Address: Selçuk University, School of Physical Education and Sports, Alaeddin Keykubat Campus, 42003, Konya, Turkey, Telephone: +90 332 2234768, Fax: +90 332 2411608, E-mail: sharbili@ 123456selcuk.edu.tr

                Authors submitted their contribution to the article to the editorial board.

                Article
                jhk-49-171
                10.1515/hukin-2015-0119
                4723166
                26839617
                ffb20a0c-62f9-48c3-8c04-9fa415333285
                © Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics

                This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

                History
                : 01 December 2015
                Categories
                Research Article
                Section III – Sports Training

                repeated wingate test,recovery,anaerobic power
                repeated wingate test, recovery, anaerobic power

                Comments

                Comment on this article