1,313
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    8
    shares

      If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

      Institute of Employment Rights Journal is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journalsFurthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Equality at work

      Published
      research-article
      Institute of Employment Rights Journal
      Pluto Journals
      Bookmark

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            10.2307/j50020018
            instemplrighj
            Institute of Employment Rights Journal
            Pluto Journals
            2398-1326
            2398-1334
            1 January 2020
            : 3
            : 1 ( doiID: 10.13169/instemplrighj.3.issue-1 )
            : 73-83
            Article
            instemplrighj.3.1.0073
            10.13169/instemplrighj.3.1.0073
            736004b0-fc03-4ab9-b313-059cbd07b938
            © 2020 Institute of Employment Rights

            All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

            History
            Custom metadata
            eng

            Labor law

            Endnotes

            1. The Yogyakarta Principles on the Application of International Human Rights Law in relation to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity, adopted by the International Commission of Jurists in 2007.

            2. Achbita v G4S Secure Solutions NV (C-157/15); [2017] IRLR 466.

            3. The exercise of this power should not be done in such a way as to undermine its effectiveness, by invoking s. 9(5)(b).

            4. See https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmjust/167/167.pdf and https://www.fawcettsociety.org.uk/News/legal-system-failing-women-need-reform-says-fawcett-landmark-sex-discrimi-nation-law-review.

            5. Formerly found in s. 38 of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA) and abolished in 2014 as part of the 'red tape' agenda: see s. 166 Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013.

            6. By an amendment of s. 124 EqA, again part of the deregulatory agenda.

            Comments

            Comment on this article