<b>A Continuation of the Debate over <i>Money and Totality</i> </b>

If you have found this article useful and you think it is important that researchers across the world have access, please consider donating, to ensure that this valuable collection remains Open Access.

The World Review of Political Economy is published by Pluto Journals, an Open Access publisher. This means that everyone has free and unlimited access to the full-text of all articles from our international collection of social science journals. Furthermore Pluto Journals authors don’t pay article processing charges (APCs).

scite_

Smart Citations

Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting

View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

Header Abstract Content Author and article information References Comments

World Review of Political Economy

Volume 10, Issue 1

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: found

Is Open Access

A Continuation of the Debate over Money and Totality

Published

research-article

Author(s): Fred Moseley

Publication date (Print): 1 April 2019

Journal: World Review of Political Economy

Publisher: Pluto Journals

Keywords: Marx, macro, monetary, transformation problem

Bookmark

Abstract

Content

Author and article information

Journal

Journal ID (doi): 10.2307/j50005553

Journal ID (jcode): worlrevipoliecon

Title: World Review of Political Economy

Publisher: Pluto Journals

ISSN: 2042-891X

ISSN: 2042-8928

Publication date (Print): 1 April 2019

Volume: 10

Issue: 1 ( doiID: 10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.10.issue-1 )

Pages: 103-115

Article

Publisher ID: worlrevipoliecon.10.1.0103

DOI: 10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.10.1.0103

SO-VID: f286dac8-868f-4801-b2da-86e30def4af4

License:

All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

History

Custom metadata

lang eng

ScienceOpen disciplines: Political economics

Keywords: monetary,transformation problem,Marx,macro

References

Laibman, David. 2018a. “Money and Totality: Another Round of Debate on Value Formation and Transformation.” World Review of Political Economy 9 (1): 21-40.
Laibman, David. 2018b. “Which Way Forward for Marxist Value Theory? A Rejoinder to Moseley.” World Review of Political Economy 9 (3): 410-419.
Marx, K. (1863) 1977. “Results of the Immediate Process of Production.” In Capital, vol. 1, by K. Marx, 949-1084. New York: Random House.
Marx, K. (1867) 1977. Capital. Vol. 1. New York: Random House.
Marx, K. (1867-1868) 2012. “Ökonomische Manuskripte 1867-68.” In Marx/Engels Gesamtausbage, Section II, Vol. 4.3, 254-280. Berlin: Dietz.
Moseley, F. 2016. Money and Totality: A Macro-Monetary Interpretation of Marx's Logic in Capital and the End of the “Transformation Problem.” Leiden and Boston: Brill.
Moseley, F. 2018. “Which Way Forward: Marx's Theory or Sraffa's Theory? A Reply to Laibman.” World Review of Political Economy 9 (2): 148-163.
Steedman, I. 1977. Marx after Sraffa. London: New Left Books.

Comments

Comment on this article

[1] Laibman, David. 2018a. “Money and Totality: Another Round of Debate on Value Formation and Transformation.” World Review of Political Economy 9 (1): 21-40.

[2] Laibman, David. 2018b. “Which Way Forward for Marxist Value Theory? A Rejoinder to Moseley.” World Review of Political Economy 9 (3): 410-419.

[3] Marx, K. (1863) 1977. “Results of the Immediate Process of Production.” In Capital, vol. 1, by K. Marx, 949-1084. New York: Random House.

[4] Marx, K. (1867) 1977. Capital. Vol. 1. New York: Random House.

[5] Marx, K. (1867-1868) 2012. “Ökonomische Manuskripte 1867-68.” In Marx/Engels Gesamtausbage, Section II, Vol. 4.3, 254-280. Berlin: Dietz.

[6] Moseley, F. 2016. Money and Totality: A Macro-Monetary Interpretation of Marx's Logic in Capital and the End of the “Transformation Problem.” Leiden and Boston: Brill.

[7] Moseley, F. 2018. “Which Way Forward: Marx's Theory or Sraffa's Theory? A Reply to Laibman.” World Review of Political Economy 9 (2): 148-163.

[8] Steedman, I. 1977. Marx after Sraffa. London: New Left Books.