1
Introduction
As of 20 April, almost 1.7 million people globally have been diagnosed with Corona
Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), a pandemic that has evolved from the emergence of a
new coronavirus strain, acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), in
China. More than 170,000 deaths have been reported, while there are certainly many
more cases of milder disease that have not been diagnosed and officially confirmed
due to limited testing capacity in most countries. The pandemic is a global emergency
due to the rapid transmission of the disease and the potential to overwhelm the healthcare
systems, and is expected to have considerable economic and health impacts. Possible
contributing factors, their possible role in the relatively high infection, death
rates between countries and origin have recently been studied [1,2]. This new outbreak
has been additionally evaluated for current knowledge on coronaviruses based on a
short history to epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestation of the disease,
as well as treatment and prevention strategies [3]. The search for potential protective
and therapeutic antiviral strategies is of particular and urgent concern [4].
While in most cases, especially in young people without any comorbidities, the disease
is expected to be relatively mild, there is a substantial proportion of patients who
develop complications and need intensive care-unit support and mechanical intubation.
In one case series of 1099 patients in China [5], 6.1 % of cases suffered from the
primary composite end-point of admission to an intensive care unit, the use of mechanical
ventilation, or death. Patients with severe disease typically present with dyspnea
and hypoxemia shortly after disease initiation, and may quickly progress to respiratory
failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and multi-organ failure [6]. Predictors
of adverse outcomes include elevated levels of inflammatory markers and pro-inflammatory
cytokines. A study of 150 COVID-19 cases reported that elevated levels of C-reactive
protein (CRP), ferritin and IL-6 were associated with death [7]. IL-6, an important
pro-inflammatory cytokine, was elevated in fatal cases of COVID-19 in another study
of 191 patients [8]. Another study of 452 patients reported that those with severe
disease showed lymphocytopenia, neutrophilia, low levels of monocytes, eosinophils
and basophils, and elevated levels of infection-related biomarkers and inflammatory
cytokines [9]. Pathological examination of a case in China revealed bilateral diffuse
alveolar damage, desquamation of pneumocytes, hyaline membrane formation and interstitial
mononuclear inflammatory infiltrates [10]. Flow cytometry of peripheral blood revealed
reduced levels of CD4+ and CD8 + T cells, which however were hyper-activated, and
elevated concentration of pro-inflammatory CCR6+ Th17 in CD4 + T cells. Such findings
are hallmarks of ARDS and resemble features observed in SARS and Middle Eastern Respiratory
Syndrome [11,12]. Systemic vasculitis was also observed [10]. Therefore, it seems
that immune dysregulation may be implicated in the pathophysiology of severe COVID-19.
2
Cytokine storm
While for decades common thinking suggested that every immune response to antigenic
invasion was always beneficial in averting potential damage, studies in the 1980s
identified that immune cells produce proteins with pleiotropic properties, having
the potential to be either beneficial or harmful [13]. The proteins, called cytokines,
were found to cause clinical manifestations similar to sepsis such as hemodynamic
instability, fever, and localized inflammation [14,15]. Cytokines are important in
mediating both immune cell recruitment and complex intracellular signaling control
mechanisms that characterize inflammation and infection control. They are expressed
by numerous cells, including macrophages, monocytes, B cells and T cells, promote
differentiation of T-helper cells and stimulate CD4+ cells [16]. While activation
of the immune system is important in fighting pathogens, dysregulation of cytokine
production may lead to uncontrolled effects that can ultimately be detrimental to
health [16,17].
Cytokine storm (also called macrophage activation syndrome) is a systemic inflammatory
response that can be triggered by a variety of factors such as infections and drugs
[18]. It represents a failure of the inflammatory response to return to homeostasis.
The resulting unregulated immune activity can potentially lead to catastrophic tissue
damage. The term first appeared in 1993 in an article relevant to graft-versus-host
disease [19]. Subsequently, cytokine storm was a phenomenon recognized in both viral
and bacterial infections. It has been particularly studied in viral infections such
as cytomegalovirus pneumonitis, influenza virus and SARS-CoV [[20], [21], [22], [23]].
Bermejo-Martin et al. [21] recruited both inpatients and outpatients during the first
wave of the pandemic flu in 2009 (nvH1N1) and examined the effects of immune host
responses to the evolution of mild or severe disease by measuring serum levels of
several chemokines and cytokines. They found a dramatic increase of mediators that
stimulate Th-1 responses and Th-17 responses (which are responsible for attacking
intracellular pathogens and clearing pathogens during host defence reactions) among
severe hospitalized patients compared to milder cases of nvH1N1 infection during the
2009 pandemic. The cytokine storm can result in acute lung injury and further progress
to ARDS. This is characterized by local infiltration of inflammatory cells, increased
vascular permeability and systemic spillover of inflammatory mediators that can cause
systemic sepsis-like symptoms [23]. While focus on cytokine storm detection relies
mostly on measuring cytokines in the systemic circulation, it has been suggested that
measuring systemic inflammatory mediators may underestimate the extent of the immunological
cascade that takes place locally in deep tissues such as the respiratory tract [23].
Considering the above, controlling the inflammatory response may be an effective way
of preventing collateral damage caused by the excessive activation of the immune system
to clear pathogens.
3
Cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway
Since the early 2000s, the cholinergic nervous system has been identified as an important
pathway that modifies and controls the inflammatory response. Surgical dissection
of the vagus nerve in mice led to enhanced TNF production and excessive response to
endotoxin administration, while vagus nerve electrical stimulation inhibits the synthesis
of TNF and prevents the acute inflammatory response [[24], [25], [26]]. Several animal
experimental models inducing pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as sepsis, ischemia-reperfusion
and pancreatitis have shown that vagus stimulation improves outcomes. This effect
is mediated by the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) α7 subunit on macrophages
[27]. Mice deficient of the α7 subunit exhibited increased endotoxin-induced TNF production,
and electrical vagus innervation failed to reduce serum TNF levels [27]. B-lymphocytes
also express α7 nAChRs. Macrophages appear to be very sensitive to acetylcholine,
which suggests that any source of acetylcholine, even from non-neuronal sources such
as epithelial and endothelial cells, could also modulate the activity of adjacent
macrophages [25]. Besides TNF, other pro-inflammatory cytokines are inhibited by acetylcholine,
such as high mobility group B1 (HMGB1), IL-1, and IL-6 [28].
Modulation of inflammatory and immune response by the central nervous system (CNS)
through the vagus nerve is based on bi-directional communication between the immune
and nervous systems. Afferent vagus nerve fibers, located in nucleus tractus solitarius,
provide sensory input to the CNS about the inflammatory status that can result in
the transmission of efferent signals, originating from the dorsal motor nucleus, to
control the inflammatory response [29]. Such a response is rapid and localized, unlike
the diffusible anti-inflammatory network, which is slow, distributed, non-integrated
and dependent on concentration gradients [25].
4
Nicotine, nicotinic cholinergic system and COVID-19
Smoking is known to increase the risk for respiratory infection susceptibility and
severity [30,31]. Considering that COVID-19 was declared by the World Health Organization
as a pandemic, a substantial disease burden would be expected among the estimated
1.1 billion smokers, especially in countries with high smoking prevalence. Therefore,
there were understandable concerns about this population subgroup [32]. Additionally,
smoking-related disease conditions such as cardiovascular disease and COPD are also
established risk factors for adverse outcomes in COVID-19 [33]. China was the first
country to be affected by the pandemic and has a high smoking prevalence. In 2018,
the population smoking prevalence was 26.6 % with a much higher prevalence in men
(50.5 %) than in women (2.1 %) [34]. Therefore, a high smoking prevalence among patients
with COVID-19 would be expected, even if smoking did not adversely affect disease
susceptibility and severity.
On 23 March, a preliminary analysis by some members of our group examined data from
5 case series of hospitalized COVID-19 patients from China, and calculated a smoking
prevalence of 10.2 % (95 % CI: 8.7–11.8 %) while the estimated expected prevalence
was 31.3 % (95 % CI: 8.7–11.8 %) [35]. The analysis was further expanded on 3 April
by examining 13 Chinese studies and 5960 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, with a pooled
smoking prevalence of 6.5 % (95 % CI: 4.9–8.2 %) [36]. On that date, we presented
for the first time a hypothesis about the potential beneficial effects of nicotine,
which was subsequently expanded [37]. While there were limitations in the study analysis,
mainly due to the inability to adjust for confounding factors, the findings of low
smoking prevalence among hospitalized COVID-19 patients in China were consistent across
all studies and in agreement with case series from USA [38,39]. The original hypothesis
was based on the anti-inflammatory properties of nicotine through the cholinergic
anti-inflammatory system, acknowledging that the disease appeared to involve a dysregulation
of the immune response to viral invasion.
It is obviously inappropriate to suggest that anyone should initiate smoking or to
continue to smoke due to the well-established smoking-related morbidities and the
large number of potentially toxic chemicals in cigarette smoke. Furthermore, it is
unlikely that any other compound in tobacco cigarette smoke, besides nicotine, would
be implicated to the potential benefits observed in smokers. Moreover, due to the
adverse effects of smoking and the fact that many smokers would suffer from co-morbidities
(such as cardiovascular disease, COPD etc.), it is expected that the potential benefits
of nicotine would be blunted when observed in smokers.
Nicotine is a cholinergic agonist. Therefore, it is an important inhibitor of pro-inflammatory
cytokines acting through the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway via α7-nAChRs.
Nicotine inhibits TNF, IL-1, IL-6 and HMGB1 while it does not inhibit anti-inflammatory
cytokines such as IL-10 (Li et al., 2011; [28]). in vivo animal models found nicotine
to be protective against lipopolysaccharide-induced ARDS by reducing leukocyte infiltration
and pro-inflammatory mediators in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (Ni et al., 2011; Mabley
et al., 2011). Such effects are relevant to COVID-19 since cytokine storm appears
to be the hallmark in severe cases [40,41]. Several pro-inflammatory cytokines, such
as IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-17, IL-8, TNF and CCL2 are elevated in COVID-19 patients
[42]. Treatment with anti-IL-6 anti-TNF medications has been proposed and clinical
trials are already underway [43,44]. However, it may be more effective to inhibit
several instead of selectively one cytokine, while some cytokine inhibitors are associated
with elevated risk of opportunistic infections [45]. Also, it is possible that measuring
blood levels of inflammatory cytokines does not accurately reflect the extent of the
immune imbalance that exists locally in the lungs. In any case, the cholinergic anti-inflammatory
system provides better control and modulation of the cytokine response compared to
blocking a single agent, and nicotine could effectively contribute to maintaining
a balanced immune response against viral infection. Therefore, it is possible that
the clinical manifestations of cytokine storm in COVID-19 patients are the result
of dysfunction of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway.
SARS-CoV-2 is known to use the angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a receptor
for cell entry [46]. ACE2 has well-established vasodilatory, anti-inflammatory and
antioxidant properties. Studies on smoking and ACE2 are contradictory. Studies published
before the COVID-19 pandemic reported that smoking and nicotine down-regulate ACE2
[47,48]. However, more recent studies suggest that they up-regulate ACE2 [[49], [50],
[51]]. There is currently no evidence to suggest that up-regulation of ACE2 is associated
with increased COVID-19 susceptibility or severity. In fact, up-regulation of ACE2
appears to be protective against tissue damage caused by SARS-CoV-2. ACE2 has been
found to protect mice from developing ARDS [[52], [53], [54]]. Data from SARS experimental
studies suggest that continuous SARS-CoV-2 infection and replication induces immediate
down-regulation of ACE2 that may be implicated in organ damage and disease severity
[55]. Further support for the beneficial role of ACE2 comes from data that estrogens
appear to up-regulate ACE2 while children and younger adults have higher ACE2 levels
compared to older people [56,57]. At the same time, women, children and young people
have milder COVID-19 symptoms. If accurate and verified, the recently-observed ACE2
up-regulation in smokers is probably induced as a defence mechanism to counteract
the effects of angiotensin II. There is probably a dynamic balance between ACE and
ACE2, which is continuously changing, depending on stressors and stimuli. Thus, there
is uncertainty on whether nicotine affects COVID-19 progression through the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone
axis and there is no known interaction between ACE2 and nAChR receptors.
Importantly, ACE2 is expressed in several regions in the brain. The regions where
vagal afferent fibers terminate and vagal efferent fibers originate exhibit ACE2 expression
[58,59]. Neuroinvasion is a common feature of coronaviruses [60]. Anosmia and ageusia
have been reported by COVID-19 patients [61]. SARS-CoV-2 may enter the CNS either
through the blood stream or via the olfactory nerve across the cribriform plate [62,63].
A case series of 214 patients reported that 36.4 % had neurological manifestations
[64]. Thus, it is possible that the virus might infect the terminal areas of vagus
afferent fibers or the origin of vagus efferent fiber causing down-regulation of ACE2
and resulting in local inflammation that could disrupt the cholinergic anti-inflammatory
pathway and dysregulate the inflammatory response. Nicotine could have protective
properties against possible brain inflammation caused by SARS-CoV-2, mediated through
α7-AChRs [65].
A noteworthy parameter relative to anosmia and ageusia observed among COVID-19 patients
is that these are characteristic and prodromal non-motor manifestations of Parkinson’s
disease [66,67]. While ageusia has not been extensively studied, olfactory disturbance
is a very common feature, observed in up to 95 % of Parkinson’s disease patients [67]
and this symptom may appear several years before the onset of motor symptoms. There
is no olfactory improvement with dopamine agonists [68,69]. Unlike the general population
where smoking is associated with impaired olfactory function, smokers with Parkinson’s
disease experience less decline in olfactory sense compared to non-smokers, suggesting
a protective effect of smoking (Sharer et al., 2015). This is explained by the fact
the phenomenon has been linked to impairment of cholinergic transmission [70] while
nicotine improved the olfactory impairment in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease
[71]. The olfactory bulb has a rich network of nAChRs, but α7 nAChRs may also be expressed
on the axon terminals of the olfactory receptor neurons [72]. While this may suggest
facilitated brain infection through anterograde transport along the olfactory nerve,
it is possible that olfactory receptor neurons may act as first-line viral sensors
and initiate a rapid immune response [73]. This would explain the mild symptoms in
COVID-19 patients with olfactory loss.In any case, anosmia may represent another sign
of dysfunction of the nicotinic cholinergic system in COVID-19.
A prominent feature of COVID-19 is coagulopathy that results in thromboembolic complications.
Venous thromboembolism was reported in 25 % of patients who were not under thromboprophylaxis,
and was associated with higher mortality rate [74]. Abnormal coagulation parameters
were also associated with poor survival [75]. Although venous thromboembolism is a
well-known risk factor of any serious infection, additional mechanisms such as endothelial
damage, increased vascular permeability and microvascular occlusion may be implicated
in COVID-19 [76]. It is important to note that platelets express functional α7-AChRs
[77] while hematopoietic α7 nAChR deficiency increases inflammation and platelet activity
[78]. Recently, acetylcholine was found to be an endogenous inhibitor of platelet
activation [79]. Therefore, dysfunction of the nicotinic cholinergic system could
be implicated in the thrombotic and vascular complications of COVID-19.
5
COVID-19 could be a disease of the nicotinic cholinergic system
The observation of a low prevalence of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in China led
to the development of a hypothesis that nicotine could have protective effects by
enhancing the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway [36]. As more studies presented
the clinical manifestations, laboratory findings and disease progression in COVID-19
patients, it became apparent that the nicotinic cholinergic system could explain most
(if not all) of the disease characteristics. It would be unlikely for a single “defence
system” to ameliorate all the diverse and complex manifestations of COVID-19, unless
that “defence mechanism” was the target of the viral host. Could that be possible?
SARS-CoV-2 appears to have originated from a bat coronavirus. Ji et al. [80] carried
out comprehensive sequence analysis in conjunction with relative synonymous codon
usage bias and reported that the virus may have been a recombinant virus between the
bat coronavirus and an unknown-origin coronavirus [80]. One possible intermediate
host could have been a snake coronavirus. Taking into consideration that snake venom
toxins are competitive antagonists of acetylcholine on α7-nACh receptor with high
affinity, we decided to explore the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 may have acquired sequences
by any of the potential, and not defined yet, intermediates through genomic recombination.
We compared the protein sequences between SARS-CoV-2 and snake venom neurotoxins.
We were able to identify regions with four or five amino acids homology between the
coronavirus and several neurotoxin molecules (e.g. SARS-CoV-2 compared with alpha
Bungarotoxin, Fig. 1
A; SARS-CoV-2 and alpha-Cobratoxin, Fig. 1B).
Fig. 1
BLAST-P alignment of the SARS-CoV-2 protein against alpha Bungarotoxin (A) and alpha-Cobratoxin
(B) indicating regions with high similarity.
Fig. 1
Therefore, we hypothesize that these sequences on the SARS-CoV-2 proteins, being similar
to the active sites of a neurotoxin, can result in binding to nAChRs and adversely
affecting their function by preventing the action of acetylcholine.
6
Nicotine as a potential treatment for COVID-19
Nicotine could act as a competitive agonist for the nAChRs that could restore the
compromised function of the nicotinic cholinergic system. This may be feasible through
repurposing already approved (for other indications) pharmaceutical nicotine products
such as nicotine patches for use by non-smokers, or even by using these products as
already indicated (i.e. as smoking substitutes) among current smokers. These products
are available over-the-counter in most countries. They have been administered therapeutically
in non-smokers for neurological conditions and inflammatory bowel disease for larger
periods than would be needed for COVID-19 [[81], [82], [83]]. No abuse liability was
observed in non-smokers despite being administerd for several weeks [82,83]. Besides
gums and patches, nicotine can be administered though inhalation, with the use of
a nebulizer or other aerosol systems, if necessary. Nicotine administration could
be added on top of antiviral or other therapeutic options for COVID-19. By restoring
and re-activating the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, a more universal suppression
of the cytokine storm could probably be achieved compared to administering inhibitors
of a single cytokine. The potential need to provide pharmaceutical nicotine products
to smokers and users of other nicotine products who experience abrupt withdrawal symptoms
of nicotine when hospitalized for COVID-19 or aim to follow medical advice to quit
smoking, should also be examined. Additionally, if the hypothesis about the beneficial
effects of nicotine is valid, smokers who quit nicotine use when hospitalized will
be deprived from these benefits. In France, the Addiction Prevention Network (RESPADD)
officially recommends the use of nicotine replacement therapies for smokers when hospitalized
for any illness [84]. Clinical trials will dictate future approaches and the role
of nicotine in COVID-19, while further experimental studies should examine the affinity
of the virus to nAChRs.
7
Conclusions
In conclusion, we noticed that most of the clinical characteristics of severe COVID-19
could be explained by dysregulation of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory system. The
observation that patients eventually develop cytokine storm which results in rapid
clinical deterioration, led to the development of a hypothesis about the series of
events associated with adverse outcomes in COVID-19 (Fig. 2
).
Fig. 2
Progression of COVID-19 after SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Fig. 2
Once someone is infected with SARS-CoV-2, the immune system is mobilized. As the virus
replicates, cell and viral debris or virions may interact with the nAChRs blocking
the action of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway. If the initial immune response
is not enough to combat the viral invasion at an early stage, the extensive and prolonged
replication of the virus will eventually block a large part the cholinergic anti-inflammatory
pathway seriously compromising its ability to control and regulate the immune response.
The uncontrolled action of pro-inflammatory cytokines will result in the development
of cytokine storm, with acute lung injury leading to ARDS, coagulation disturbances
and multiorgan failure. Based on this hypothesis, COVID-19 appears to eventually become
a disease of the nicotinic cholinergic system. Nicotine could maintain or restore
the function of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory system and thus control the release
and activity of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This could prevent or suppress the cytokine
storm. This hypothesis needs to be examined in the laboratory and the clinical setting.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Funding
No funding was provided for this study.
Uncited references
[[85], [86], [87]].
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.