1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Exchanging and managing in- vitro elite germplasm to combat Cassava Brown Streak Disease (CBSD) and Cassava Mosaic Disease (CMD) in Eastern and Southern Africa

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cassava varieties resistant to cassava mosaic disease (CMD) and cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) are needed for the food and income security of the rural poor in eastern and southern Africa (ESA). The International Institute of Tropical Agriculture led five national cassava breeding programs (Malawi, Mozambique, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda) in virus-cleaning and exchanging elite cassava germplasm resistant to both diseases. This paper documents the experiences and lessons learned from the process. Thirty-one clones (25 elite, two standard and four national) were submitted by the five breeding programs to the Natural Resources Institute and Kenya Plant Health Inspectorate Services for virus cleaning and indexing. Subsequently, ca 75 invitro virus-indexed plantlets per clone were sent to Genetic Technologies International Limited (GTIL), a private tissue culture (TC) lab in Kenya, and micro-propagated to produce ≥1500 plantlets. After fulfilling all the formal procedures of germplasm exchange between countries ≥300 plantlets per clone were sent to each partner country. National check clones susceptible to CMD/CBSD were sent only to their countries of origin. In each country, the in-vitro plantlets were acclimatized under screen house conditions and transferred to clean isolated sites for field multiplication. All the clones were cleaned of the viruses, except Tomo. The cleaning process was slow for F19-NL, NASE1, and Kibandameno and TC micro-propagation at GTIL was less efficient for Pwani, Tajirika, NASE1, and Okhumelela than for the other clones. Difficulties in cleaning recalcitrant clones affected the timeline for establishing the multi-site evaluation trials in target countries. The initiative is the one of the kind to successfully clean and exchange elite germplasm as a joint action to combat CBSD in ESA. Adequate preparation in terms of infrastructure and personnel are critical to successfully receiving and adapting the indexed in-vitro plants as new germplasm.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Comparing the regional epidemiology of the cassava mosaic and cassava brown streak virus pandemics in Africa.

          The rapid geographical expansion of the cassava mosaic disease (CMD) pandemic, caused by cassava mosaic geminiviruses, has devastated cassava crops in 12 countries of East and Central Africa since the late 1980s. Region-level surveys have revealed a continuing pattern of annual spread westward and southward along a contiguous 'front'. More recently, outbreaks of cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) were reported from Uganda and other parts of East Africa that had been hitherto unaffected by the disease. Recent survey data reveal several significant contrasts between the regional epidemiology of these two pandemics: (i) severe CMD radiates out from an initial centre of origin, whilst CBSD seems to be spreading from independent 'hot-spots'; (ii) the severe CMD pandemic has arisen from recombination and synergy between virus species, whilst the CBSD pandemic seems to be a 'new encounter' situation between host and pathogen; (iii) CMD pandemic spread has been tightly linked with the appearance of super-abundant Bemisia tabaci whitefly vector populations, in contrast to CBSD, where outbreaks have occurred 3-12 years after whitefly population increases; (iv) the CMGs causing CMD are transmitted in a persistent manner, whilst the two cassava brown streak viruses appear to be semi-persistently transmitted; and (v) different patterns of symptom expression mean that phytosanitary measures could be implemented easily for CMD but have limited effectiveness, whereas similar measures are difficult to apply for CBSD but are potentially very effective. An important similarity between the pandemics is that the viruses occurring in pandemic-affected areas are also found elsewhere, indicating that contrary to earlier published conclusions, the viruses per se are unlikely to be the key factors driving the two pandemics. A diagrammatic representation illustrates the temporal relationship between B. tabaci abundance and changing incidences of both CMD and CBSD in the Great Lakes region. This emphasizes the pivotal role played by the vector in both pandemics and the urgent need to identify effective and sustainable strategies for controlling whiteflies on cassava. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Is Cassava the Answer to African Climate Change Adaptation?

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cassava virus diseases: biology, epidemiology, and management.

              Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz.) is the most important vegetatively propagated food staple in Africa and a prominent industrial crop in Latin America and Asia. Its vegetative propagation through stem cuttings has many advantages, but deleteriously it means that pathogens are passed from one generation to the next and can easily accumulate, threatening cassava production. Cassava-growing continents are characterized by specific suites of viruses that affect cassava and pose particular threats. Of major concern, causing large and increasing economic impact in Africa and Asia are the cassava mosaic geminiviruses that cause cassava mosaic disease in Africa and Asia and cassava brown streak viruses causing cassava brown streak disease in Africa. Latin America, the center of origin and domestication of the crop, hosts a diverse set of virus species, of which the most economically important give rise to cassava frog skin disease syndrome. Here, we review current knowledge on the biology, epidemiology, and control of the most economically important groups of viruses in relation to both farming and cultural practices. Components of virus control strategies examined include: diagnostics and surveillance, prevention and control of infection using phytosanitation, and control of disease through the breeding and promotion of varieties that inhibit virus replication and/or movement. We highlight areas that need further research attention and conclude by examining the likely future global outlook for virus disease management in cassava.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Food Secur
                Food Secur
                FS
                Food Security
                Springer Nature
                1876-4517
                1876-4525
                17 March 2018
                2018
                : 10
                : 351-368
                Affiliations
                [1 ]International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), PO Box 34441, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
                [2 ]Department of Agricultural Research and Development, PO Box 2066, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
                [3 ]Zanzibar Agricultural Research Institute, PO Box 159, Zanzibar, Tanzania
                [4 ]National Agricultural Research Organization, PO Box 295, Entebbe, Uganda
                [5 ]Department for Agricultural Research Services, Chitedze Research Station, PO Box 158, Lilongwe, Malawi
                [6 ]Instituto de Investigacao Agraria de Mocambique, PO Box 3658, Maputo, Mozambique
                [7 ]Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization, PO Box 57811 – 00200, Nairobi, Kenya
                [8 ]Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, PO Box 62,000 – 00200, Nairobi, Kenya
                [9 ]Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Kent, UK
                [10 ]Kenya Plant Inspectorate Services, Plant Quarantine and Biosecurity Station, Muguga, PO Box 49592 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya
                [11 ]Genetic Technologies International Limited, PO Box 47430 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya
                [12 ]Mikocheni Agricultural Research Institute, PO Box 6226, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
                Author notes
                [* ]Silver Tumwegamire s.tumwegamire@ 123456cgiar.org
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2971-9110
                Article
                FS-10-351
                10.1007/s12571-018-0779-2
                7705177
                0124c879-8759-46fd-b3ac-86d39a261ff4
                © 2018 The Author(s)

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 13 April 2017
                : 19 February 2018
                Categories
                Original Paper

                exchange,in-vitro,germplasm,cbsd and cmd
                exchange, in-vitro, germplasm, cbsd and cmd

                Comments

                Comment on this article