1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Co‐delivery of dendritic cell vaccine and anti‐PD‐1 antibody with cryomicroneedles for combinational immunotherapy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Combinational immunotherapy of dendritic cell (DC) vaccines and anti‐programmed cell death protein 1 antibodies (aPD1) has been regarded as a promising strategy for cancer treatment because it not only induces tumor‐specific T cell immune responses, but also prevents failure of T cell functions by the immune suppressive milieu of tumors. Microneedles have emerged as an innovative platform for efficient transdermal immunotherapies. However, co‐delivery of DC vaccines and aPD1 via microneedles has not been studied since conventional microneedle platforms are unsuitable for fragile therapeutics like living cells and antibodies. This study employs our newly invented cryomicroneedles (cryoMNs) to co‐deliver DC vaccines and aPD1 for the combinational immunotherapy. CryoMNs are fabricated by stepwise cryogenic micromoulding of cryogenic medium with pre‐suspended DCs and aPD1, which are further integrated with a homemade handle for convenient application. The viability of DCs in cryoMNs remains above 85%. CryoMNs are mechanically strong enough to insert into porcine and mouse skin, successfully releasing DCs and aPD1 inside skin tissue after melting. Co‐delivery of ovalbumin (OVA)‐pulsed DCs (OVA‐DCs) and aPD1 via cryoMNs induced higher antigen‐specific cellular immune responses compared with the mono‐delivery of OVA‐DCs or aPD1. Finally, administration with cryoMNs co‐encapsulated with OVA‐DCs and aPD1 increases the infiltration of effector T cells in the tumor, resulting in stronger anti‐tumor therapeutic efficacy in both prophylactic and therapeutic melanoma models compared with administration with cryoMNs loaded with OVA‐DCs or aPD1. This study demonstrates the great potential of cryoMNs as a co‐delivery system of therapeutic cells and biomacromolecules for combinational therapies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade

          The release of negative regulators of immune activation (immune checkpoints) that limit antitumor responses has resulted in unprecedented rates of long-lasting tumor responses in patients with a variety of cancers. This can be achieved by antibodies blocking the cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) or the programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway, either alone or in combination. The main premise for inducing an immune response is the pre-existence of antitumor T cells that were limited by specific immune checkpoints. Most patients who have tumor responses maintain long lasting disease control, yet one third of patients relapse. Mechanisms of acquired resistance are currently poorly understood, but evidence points to alterations that converge on the antigen presentation and interferon gamma signaling pathways. New generation combinatorial therapies may overcome resistance mechanisms to immune checkpoint therapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A guide to cancer immunotherapy: from T cell basic science to clinical practice

            The T lymphocyte, especially its capacity for antigen-directed cytotoxicity, has become a central focus for engaging the immune system in the fight against cancer. Basic science discoveries elucidating the molecular and cellular biology of the T cell have led to new strategies in this fight, including checkpoint blockade, adoptive cellular therapy and cancer vaccinology. This area of immunological research has been highly active for the past 50 years and is now enjoying unprecedented bench-to-bedside clinical success. Here, we provide a comprehensive historical and biological perspective regarding the advent and clinical implementation of cancer immunotherapeutics, with an emphasis on the fundamental importance of T lymphocyte regulation. We highlight clinical trials that demonstrate therapeutic efficacy and toxicities associated with each class of drug. Finally, we summarize emerging therapies and emphasize the yet to be elucidated questions and future promise within the field of cancer immunotherapy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Dendritic cells in cancer immunology and immunotherapy

              Dendritic cells (DCs) are a diverse group of specialized antigen-presenting cells with key roles in the initiation and regulation of innate and adaptive immune responses. As such, there is currently much interest in modulating DC function to improve cancer immunotherapy. Many strategies have been developed to target DCs in cancer, such as the administration of antigens with immunomodulators that mobilize and activate endogenous DCs, as well as the generation of DC-based vaccines. A better understanding of the diversity and functions of DC subsets and of how these are shaped by the tumour microenvironment could lead to improved therapies for cancer. Here we will outline how different DC subsets influence immunity and tolerance in cancer settings and discuss the implications for both established cancer treatments and novel immunotherapy strategies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                changhao@ibmc.ac.cn
                chenjie.xu@cityu.edu.hk
                Journal
                Bioeng Transl Med
                Bioeng Transl Med
                10.1002/(ISSN)2380-6761
                BTM2
                Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                2380-6761
                27 November 2022
                September 2023
                : 8
                : 5 ( doiID: 10.1002/btm2.v8.5 )
                : e10457
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital) Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences Hangzhou Zhejiang China
                [ 2 ] Department of Biomedical Engineering City University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China
                [ 3 ] College of Pharmaceutical Science, Zhejiang University of Technology Hangzhou Zhejiang China
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Hao Chang, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy ofSciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022, China.

                Email: changhao@ 123456ibmc.ac.cn

                Chenjie Xu, Department of Biomedical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

                Email: chenjie.xu@ 123456cityu.edu.hk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6326-6189
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6649-7177
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2367-2136
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8278-3912
                Article
                BTM210457
                10.1002/btm2.10457
                10487323
                37693072
                01eda5d4-0bac-4840-8840-4c1bd9f9fcca
                © 2022 The Authors. Bioengineering & Translational Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Institute of Chemical Engineers.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 02 November 2022
                : 19 August 2022
                : 17 November 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 0, Pages: 12, Words: 7316
                Funding
                Funded by: General Research Fund (GRF) grant from the Research Grants Council (RGC) of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region China , doi 10.13039/100001641;
                Award ID: CityU 100168
                Funded by: Mainland/Hong Kong Joint Research Scheme sponsored by the RGC Hong Kong and the National Natural Science Foundation of China
                Award ID: N_CityU118/20
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China , doi 10.13039/501100001809;
                Award ID: 82202329
                Funded by: Medcraft Biotech. Inc.
                Award ID: 2022HX01
                Funded by: Startup funding supported by the Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences
                Award ID: 2021QD08‐1
                Award ID: 2021QD08‐2
                Funded by: Start‐up Grant for New Faculty from City University of Hong Kong
                Award ID: 9610472
                Funded by: Strategic Interdisciplinary Research Grant from City University of Hong Kong
                Award ID: 7020029
                Categories
                Research Article
                Special Issue Articles
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                September 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.3.3 mode:remove_FC converted:08.09.2023

                anti‐pd‐1,cancer immunotherapy,cryomicroneedles,dendritic cells,transdermal delivery

                Comments

                Comment on this article