9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      G Protein-Coupled Receptor Systems as Crucial Regulators of DNA Damage Response Processes

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and their associated proteins represent one of the most diverse cellular signaling systems involved in both physiological and pathophysiological processes. Aging represents perhaps the most complex biological process in humans and involves a progressive degradation of systemic integrity and physiological resilience. This is in part mediated by age-related aberrations in energy metabolism, mitochondrial function, protein folding and sorting, inflammatory activity and genomic stability. Indeed, an increased rate of unrepaired DNA damage is considered to be one of the ‘hallmarks’ of aging. Over the last two decades our appreciation of the complexity of GPCR signaling systems has expanded their functional signaling repertoire. One such example of this is the incipient role of GPCRs and GPCR-interacting proteins in DNA damage and repair mechanisms. Emerging data now suggest that GPCRs could function as stress sensors for intracellular damage, e.g., oxidative stress. Given this role of GPCRs in the DNA damage response process, coupled to the effective history of drug targeting of these receptors, this suggests that one important future activity of GPCR therapeutics is the rational control of DNA damage repair systems.

          Related collections

          Most cited references203

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Oxidative stress shortens telomeres.

          Telomeres in most human cells shorten with each round of DNA replication, because they lack the enzyme telomerase. This is not, however, the only determinant of the rate of loss of telomeric DNA. Oxidative damage is repaired less well in telomeric DNA than elsewhere in the chromosome, and oxidative stress accelerates telomere loss, whereas antioxidants decelerate it. I suggest here that oxidative stress is an important modulator of telomere loss and that telomere-driven replicative senescence is primarily a stress response. This might have evolved to block the growth of cells that have been exposed to a high risk of mutation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Persistent DNA damage signaling triggers senescence-associated inflammatory cytokine secretion

            Cellular senescence suppresses cancer by stably arresting the proliferation of damaged cells1. Paradoxically, senescent cells also secrete factors that alter tissue microenvironments2. The pathways regulating this secretion are unknown. We show that damaged human cells develop persistent chromatin lesions bearing hallmarks of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), which initiate increased secretion of inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6). Cytokine secretion occurred only after establishment of persistent DNA damage signaling, usually associated with senescence, not after transient DNA damage responses (DDR). Initiation and maintenance of this cytokine response required the DDR proteins ATM, NBS1 and CHK2, but not the cell cycle arrest enforcers p53 and pRb. ATM was also essential for IL-6 secretion during oncogene-induced senescence and by damaged cells that bypass senescence. Further, DDR activity and IL-6 were elevated in human cancers, and ATM-depletion suppressed the ability of senescent cells to stimulate IL-6-dependent cancer cell invasiveness. Thus, in addition to orchestrating cell cycle checkpoints and DNA repair, a novel and important role of the DDR is to allow damaged cells to communicate their compromised state to the surrounding tissue.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Extension of life-span by introduction of telomerase into normal human cells.

              Normal human cells undergo a finite number of cell divisions and ultimately enter a nondividing state called replicative senescence. It has been proposed that telomere shortening is the molecular clock that triggers senescence. To test this hypothesis, two telomerase-negative normal human cell types, retinal pigment epithelial cells and foreskin fibroblasts, were transfected with vectors encoding the human telomerase catalytic subunit. In contrast to telomerase-negative control clones, which exhibited telomere shortening and senescence, telomerase-expressing clones had elongated telomeres, divided vigorously, and showed reduced straining for beta-galactosidase, a biomarker for senescence. Notably, the telomerase-expressing clones have a normal karyotype and have already exceeded their normal life-span by at least 20 doublings, thus establishing a causal relationship between telomere shortening and in vitro cellular senescence. The ability to maintain normal human cells in a phenotypically youthful state could have important applications in research and medicine.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Mol Sci
                Int J Mol Sci
                ijms
                International Journal of Molecular Sciences
                MDPI
                1422-0067
                26 September 2018
                October 2018
                : 19
                : 10
                : 2919
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium; Hanne.Leysen@ 123456student.uantwerpen.be (H.L.); Jaana.vanGastel@ 123456uantwerpen.vib.be (J.v.G.); Jhana.Hendrickx@ 123456uantwerpen.vib.be (J.O.H.); Bronwen.Martin@ 123456uantwerpen.be (B.M.)
                [2 ]Translational Neurobiology Group, Center of Molecular Neurology, VIB, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
                [3 ]Institute of Biophysics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10115 Berlin, Germany; p.santosotte@ 123456gmail.com
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: Stuart.Maudsley@ 123456uantwerpen.vib.be ; Tel.: +32-3265-1057
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7639-2926
                Article
                ijms-19-02919
                10.3390/ijms19102919
                6213947
                30261591
                0789497d-8357-4dde-80ca-1f9ebc64029a
                © 2018 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 22 August 2018
                : 15 September 2018
                Categories
                Review

                Molecular biology
                g protein-coupled receptor (gpcr),aging,dna damage,β-arrestin,g protein-coupled receptor kinase (grk),interactome,g protein-coupled receptor kinase interacting protein 2 (git2),ataxia telangiectasia mutated (atm),clock proteins,energy metabolism

                Comments

                Comment on this article