5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The NOTCH1/ SNAIL1/MEF2C Pathway Regulates Growth and Self-Renewal in Embryonal Rhabdomyosarcoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Tumor-propagating cells (TPCs) share self-renewal properties with normal stem cells and drive continued tumor growth. However, mechanisms regulating TPC self-renewal are largely unknown, especially in embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS)—a common pediatric cancer of muscle. Here, we used a zebrafish transgenic model of ERMS to identify a role for intracellular NOTCH1 (ICN1) in increasing TPCs by 23-fold. ICN1 expanded TPCs by enabling the de-differentiation of zebrafish ERMS cells into self-renewing myf5+ TPCs, breaking the rigid differentiation hierarchies reported in normal muscle. ICN1 also had conserved roles in regulating human ERMS self-renewal and growth. Mechanistically, ICN1 up-regulated expression of SNAIL1, a transcriptional repressor, to increase TPC number in human ERMS and to block muscle differentiation through suppressing MEF2C, a myogenic differentiation transcription factor. Our data implicate the NOTCH1/SNAI1/MEF2C signaling axis as a major determinant of TPC self-renewal and differentiation in ERMS, raising hope of therapeutically targeting this pathway in the future.

          Graphical abstract

          Tumor-propagating cells (TPCs) drive cancer growth, yet mechanisms regulating TPC self-renewal and maintenance are largely unknown. Ignatius et al. show that the NOTCH1/SNAIL1 pathway synergizes with RAS to expand TPCs in embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma. This pathway blocks MEF2C-induced differentiation and enables the de-differentiation of ERMS cells into self-renewing TPCs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Stem cells and niches: mechanisms that promote stem cell maintenance throughout life.

          Niches are local tissue microenvironments that maintain and regulate stem cells. Long-predicted from mammalian studies, these structures have recently been characterized within several invertebrate tissues using methods that reliably identify individual stem cells and their functional requirements. Although similar single-cell resolution has usually not been achieved in mammalian tissues, principles likely to govern the behavior of niches in diverse organisms are emerging. Considerable progress has been made in elucidating how the microenvironment promotes stem cell maintenance. Mechanisms of stem cell maintenance are key to the regulation of homeostasis and likely contribute to aging and tumorigenesis when altered during adulthood.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Notch signalling in solid tumours: a little bit of everything but not all the time.

            The discovery of Notch in Drosophila melanogaster nearly a century ago opened the door to an ever-widening understanding of cellular processes that are controlled or influenced by Notch signalling. As would be expected with such a pleiotropic pathway, the deregulation of Notch signalling leads to several pathological conditions, including cancer. A role for Notch is well established in haematological malignancies, and more recent studies have provided evidence for the importance of Notch activity in solid tumours. As it is thought to act as an oncogene in some cancers but as a tumour suppressor in others, the role of Notch in solid tumours seems to be highly context dependent.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Notch-mediated restoration of regenerative potential to aged muscle.

              A hallmark of aging is diminished regenerative potential of tissues, but the mechanism of this decline is unknown. Analysis of injured muscle revealed that, with age, resident precursor cells (satellite cells) had a markedly impaired propensity to proliferate and to produce myoblasts necessary for muscle regeneration. This was due to insufficient up-regulation of the Notch ligand Delta and, thus, diminished activation of Notch in aged, regenerating muscle. Inhibition of Notch impaired regeneration of young muscle, whereas forced activation of Notch restored regenerative potential to old muscle. Thus, Notch signaling is a key determinant of muscle regenerative potential that declines with age.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                101573691
                39703
                Cell Rep
                Cell Rep
                Cell reports
                2211-1247
                9 June 2017
                13 June 2017
                19 August 2017
                : 19
                : 11
                : 2304-2318
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
                [2 ]Center of Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
                [3 ]Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Boston, MA 02114, USA
                [4 ]Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute and Department of Molecular Medicine, UT Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
                [5 ]Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
                [6 ]Division of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
                [7 ]Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
                [8 ]Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA 02215, USA
                [9 ]Oncogenomics Section, Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
                [10 ]Department of Pediatrics and Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
                [11 ]Molecular Neurotherapy and Imaging Laboratory, Stem Cell Therapeutics and Imaging Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
                [12 ]Department of Pediatrics and Genetics, Children's of Alabama and the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
                [13 ]Children's Cancer Therapy Development Institute, Beaverton, OR 97005, USA
                Author notes
                [14]

                These authors contributed equally

                [15]

                Lead Contact

                Article
                NIHMS880402
                10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.061
                5563075
                28614716
                08a85f31-9321-41bc-9c5a-8eb88482578d

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Cell biology
                Cell biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article