6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Suspect Screening of Maternal Serum to Identify New Environmental Chemical Biomonitoring Targets using Liquid Chromatography-Quadrupole Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometry

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The use and advantages of high-resolution mass spectrometry as a discovery tool for environmental chemical monitoring has been demonstrated for environmental samples but not for biological samples. We developed a method using liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF/MS) for discovery of previously unmeasured environmental chemicals in human serum. Using non-targeted data acquisition (full scan MS analysis) we were able to screen for environmental organic acids (EOAs) in 20 serum samples from second trimester pregnant women. We define EOAs as environmental organic compounds with at least one dissociable proton which are utilized in commerce. EOAs include environmental phenols, phthalate metabolites, perfluorinated compounds (PFCs), phenolic metabolites of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and acidic pesticides and/or predicted acidic pesticide metabolites. Our validated method used solid phase extraction, reversed phase chromatography in a C18 column with gradient elution, electrospray ionization in negative polarity, and automated MS/MS data acquisition to maximize true positive rates. We identified “suspect EOAs” using Agilent MassHunter Qualitative Analysis software to match chemical formulas it generated from each sample run with molecular formulas in our unique database of 693 EOAs assembled from multiple environmental literature sources. We found potential matches for 282 (41%) of the EOAs in our database. Sixty-five of these suspect EOAs were detected in at least 75% of the samples, only 19 of these compounds are currently biomonitored in NHANES. We confirmed two of three suspect EOAs by LC-QTOF/MS using a targeted method developed through liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, reporting the first confirmation of benzophenone-1 and bisphenol S in pregnant women’s sera. Our suspect screening workflow provides an approach to comprehensively scan environmental chemical exposures in humans. This can provide a better source of exposure information to help improve exposure and risk evaluation of industrial chemicals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Non-target screening with high-resolution mass spectrometry: critical review using a collaborative trial on water analysis.

          In this article, a dataset from a collaborative non-target screening trial organised by the NORMAN Association is used to review the state-of-the-art and discuss future perspectives of non-target screening using high-resolution mass spectrometry in water analysis. A total of 18 institutes from 12 European countries analysed an extract of the same water sample collected from the River Danube with either one or both of liquid and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry detection. This article focuses mainly on the use of high resolution screening techniques with target, suspect, and non-target workflows to identify substances in environmental samples. Specific examples are given to emphasise major challenges including isobaric and co-eluting substances, dependence on target and suspect lists, formula assignment, the use of retention information, and the confidence of identification. Approaches and methods applicable to unit resolution data are also discussed. Although most substances were identified using high resolution data with target and suspect-screening approaches, some participants proposed tentative non-target identifications. This comprehensive dataset revealed that non-target analytical techniques are already substantially harmonised between the participants, but the data processing remains time-consuming. Although the objective of a "fully-automated identification workflow" remains elusive in the short term, important steps in this direction have been taken, exemplified by the growing popularity of suspect screening approaches. Major recommendations to improve non-target screening include better integration and connection of desired features into software packages, the exchange of target and suspect lists, and the contribution of more spectra from standard substances into (openly accessible) databases. Graphical Abstract Matrix of identification approach versus identification confidence.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Toxicity Data Landscape for Environmental Chemicals

            Objective Thousands of chemicals are in common use, but only a portion of them have undergone significant toxicologic evaluation, leading to the need to prioritize the remainder for targeted testing. To address this issue, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other organizations are developing chemical screening and prioritization programs. As part of these efforts, it is important to catalog, from widely dispersed sources, the toxicology information that is available. The main objective of this analysis is to define a list of environmental chemicals that are candidates for the U.S. EPA screening and prioritization process, and to catalog the available toxicology information. Data sources We are developing ACToR (Aggregated Computational Toxicology Resource), which combines information for hundreds of thousands of chemicals from > 200 public sources, including the U.S. EPA, National Institutes of Health, Food and Drug Administration, corresponding agencies in Canada, Europe, and Japan, and academic sources. Data extraction ACToR contains chemical structure information; physical–chemical properties; in vitro assay data; tabular in vivo data; summary toxicology calls (e.g., a statement that a chemical is considered to be a human carcinogen); and links to online toxicology summaries. Here, we use data from ACToR to assess the toxicity data landscape for environmental chemicals. Data synthesis We show results for a set of 9,912 environmental chemicals being considered for analysis as part of the U.S. EPA ToxCast screening and prioritization program. These include high-and medium-production-volume chemicals, pesticide active and inert ingredients, and drinking water contaminants. Conclusions Approximately two-thirds of these chemicals have at least limited toxicity summaries available. About one-quarter have been assessed in at least one highly curated toxicology evaluation database such as the U.S. EPA Toxicology Reference Database, U.S. EPA Integrated Risk Information System, and the National Toxicology Program.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Are there other persistent organic pollutants? A challenge for environmental chemists.

              The past 5 years have seen some major successes in terms of global measurement and regulation of persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PB&T) chemicals and persistent organic pollutants (POPs). The Stockholm Convention, a global agreement on POPs, came into force in 2004. There has been a major expansion of measurements and risk assessments of new chemical contaminants in the global environment, particularly brominated diphenyl ethers and perfluorinated alkyl acids. However, the list of chemicals measured represents only a small fraction of the approximately 30,000 chemicals widely used in commerce (>1 t/y). The vast majority of existing and new chemical substances in commerce are not monitored in environmental media. Assessment and screening of thousands of existing chemicals in commerce in the United States, Europe, and Canada have yielded lists of potentially persistent and bioaccumulative chemicals. Here we review recent screening and categorization studies of chemicals in commerce and address the question of whether there is now sufficient information to permit a broader array of chemicals to be determined in environmental matrices. For example, Environment Canada's recent categorization of the Domestic (existing) Substances list, using a wide array of quantitative structure activity relationships for PB&T characteristics, has identified about 5.5% of 11,317 substances as meeting P & B criteria. Using data from the Environment Canada categorization, we have listed, for discussion purposes, 30 chemicals with high predicted bioconcentration and low rate of biodegradation and 28 with long range atmospheric transport potential based on predicted atmospheric oxidation half-lives >2 days and log air-water partition coefficients > or =5 and < or =1. These chemicals are a diverse group including halogenated organics, cyclic siloxanes, and substituted aromatics. Some of these chemicals and their transformation products may be candidates for future environmental monitoring. However, to improve these predictions data on emissions from end use are needed to refine environmental fate predictions, and analytical methods may need to be developed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                101262796
                32819
                J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol
                J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol
                Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology
                1559-0631
                1559-064X
                12 July 2019
                11 October 2017
                March 2018
                18 July 2019
                : 28
                : 2
                : 101-108
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Clinical Toxicology and Environmental Biomonitoring Laboratory, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco
                [2 ]Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding Author: Roy R. Gerona, University of California, San Francisco, Clinical Toxicology and Environmental Biomonitoring Laboratory, 513 Parnassus Ave. Medical Sciences Building, Room #S864, San Francisco, CA 94143, Roy.Gerona@ 123456ucsf.edu , Phone: 415.514.5749
                Article
                NIHMS935371
                10.1038/jes.2017.28
                6639024
                29019345
                0a7d03fa-1e42-4407-a94a-97f6a4a7e39e

                Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Occupational & Environmental medicine
                Occupational & Environmental medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content118

                Cited by15

                Most referenced authors325