34
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Differences of cardiac output measurements by open-circuit acetylene uptake in pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a cohort study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          As differences in gas exchange between pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) have been demonstrated, we asked if cardiac output measurements determined by acetylene (C 2H 2) uptake significantly differed in these diseases when compared to the thermodilution technique.

          Method

          Single-breath open-circuit C 2H 2 uptake, thermodilution, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing were performed in 72 PAH and 32 CTEPH patients.

          Results

          In PAH patients the results for cardiac output obtained by the two methods showed an acceptable agreement with a mean difference of -0.16 L/min (95% CI -2.64 to 2.32 L/min). In contrast, the agreement was poorer in the CTEPH group with the difference being -0.56 L/min (95% CI -4.96 to 3.84 L/min). Functional dead space ventilation (44.5 ± 1.6 vs. 32.2 ± 1.4%, p < 0.001) and the mean arterial to end-tidal CO 2 gradient (9.9 ± 0.8 vs. 4.1 ± 0.5 mmHg, p < 0.001) were significantly elevated among CTEPH patients.

          Conclusion

          Cardiac output evaluation by the C 2H 2 technique should be interpreted with caution in CTEPH, as ventilation to perfusion mismatching might be more relevant than in PAH.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

          In clinical measurement comparison of a new measurement technique with an established one is often needed to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old. Such investigations are often analysed inappropriately, notably by using correlation coefficients. The use of correlation is misleading. An alternative approach, based on graphical techniques and simple calculations, is described, together with the relation between this analysis and the assessment of repeatability.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Determination of cardiac output by the Fick method, thermodilution, and acetylene rebreathing in pulmonary hypertension.

            Assessment of cardiac output is an important part of the management of patients with pulmonary hypertension. The accuracy of the thermodilution technique in patients with low cardiac output or severe tricuspid regurgitation has been questioned. To address this issue, we simultaneously compared 105 cardiac output measurements by the Fick method and thermodilution in 35 patients with pulmonary hypertension. Moreover, we evaluated the acetylene rebreathing technique, a noninvasive method of determining cardiac output. The mean difference +/- 95% limit of agreement between thermodilution and the Fick method was +0.01 +/- 1.1 L/min. The mean difference +/- 95% limit of agreement between acetylene rebreathing and the Fick method was -0.23 +/- 1.14 L/min. Neither the mean agreement nor the 95% limits of agreement of both thermodilution and acetylene rebreathing with the Fick method were affected by the presence of low cardiac output or severe tricuspid regurgitation. We conclude that thermodilution and acetylene rebreathing are useful tools for assessing cardiac output in patients with pulmonary hypertension, even in the presence of low cardiac output or severe tricuspid regurgitation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Differences in ventilatory inefficiency between pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

              Measures of ventilatory efficiency during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) are increasingly being used as prognostic markers in heart failure and pulmonary hypertension (PH). Little is known about whether these measures can be applied to all forms of PH, in particular chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), wherein thrombotic vascular occlusion has an impact on gas exchange. One hundred twenty-seven patients, 50 with CTEPH and 77 with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), underwent incremental CPX. Physiologic ventilatory dead space fraction (Vd/Vtphys) measured at peak exercise with arterial blood gas analysis was higher in CTEPH than PAH (52.9% vs 41.8%, P < .001). The V(E)/V(CO(2)) slope was higher in patients with CTEPH than in patients with PAH (50.7 L/min/L/min vs 44.4 L/min/L/min, P = .024) and was mirrored by similar changes in the ventilatory equivalent for CO(2) at anaerobic threshold (Eqco(2)_AT) (47.7 L/min/L/min vs 42.0 L/min/L/min, P = .008). In a multivariate linear regression analysis, disease subtype was found to be an independent predictor of Vd/Vtphys (P < .001), V(E)/V(CO(2)) slope (P = .003), and Eqco(2)_AT (P < .001). These three measures could distinguish between World Health Organization functional classes I/II and III/IV in PAH but not CTEPH. Significant differences in gas exchange exist between CTEPH and PAH, due to differences in Vd/Vtphys likely as a result of vascular occlusion due to thromboembolic disease. This dissociates measures of ventilatory efficiency from disease severity and also contributes to our understanding of the differences in exercise limitation and breathlessness in PAH and CTEPH. Common prognostic end points from CPX cannot be applied to all forms of PH.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Respir Res
                Respir. Res
                Respiratory Research
                BioMed Central
                1465-9921
                1465-993X
                2012
                12 March 2012
                : 13
                : 1
                : 18
                Affiliations
                [1 ]1. Department of Internal Medicine, Klinikum Augsburg, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Stenglinstrasse 2, D-86156 Augsburg, Germany
                Article
                1465-9921-13-18
                10.1186/1465-9921-13-18
                3323432
                22409387
                0c271504-6e83-4ebd-8d0c-bafe3827db44
                Copyright ©2012 Schwaiblmair et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 7 December 2011
                : 12 March 2012
                Categories
                Research

                Respiratory medicine
                single-breath open-circuit acetylene uptake,cardiac output,thermodilution,chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension,pulmonary arterial hypertension

                Comments

                Comment on this article