31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A shared decision‐making model about care for people with severe dementia: A qualitative study based on nutrition and hydration decisions in acute hospitals

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To understand the decision‐making processes regarding eating and drinking for hospital patients with severe dementia and use this data to modify a decision‐making model about care for people with severe dementia.

          Methods

          From January to May 2021, qualitative semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 29 family carers and hospital staff in England who cared for people with severe dementia during hospital admissions. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using codebook thematic analysis.

          Results

          We demonstrated a modified decision‐making model consisting of six stages of the decision‐making process: (i) identify a decision to be made; (ii) exchange information and recognise emotions; (iii) clarify values and preferences of all involved; (iv) consider feasibility of each choice; (v) share preferred choice and make a final decision; and (vi) deliver the decision, monitor outcomes and renegotiation. From this study, decision‐making needed to be shared among all people involved and address holistic needs and personal values of people with dementia and family carers. However, hospital staff often made assumptions about the persons' ability to eat and drink without adequate consultation with family carers. The process was impacted by ward culture, professional practice, and legal framework, which might overlook cultural and personal beliefs of the persons and families. Treatment escalation plans could help inform stepwise treatments, create realistic expectations, and guide future decisions.

          Conclusions

          Our decision‐making model provides clear stages of decision‐making processes and can be used to guide clinical practice and policy around care decisions for eating and drinking, which is often poorly supported.

          Key points

          • Most family carers and hospital staff use best‐interest decision‐making, considering the person with dementia's life history, previous wishes and preferences, current behaviours, and overall health conditions.

          • Without adequate discussion with family carers, some staff spoon‐feed or give intravenous fluids to the person with severe dementia because they assume the person had lost their ability to eat by themselves, diminishing their autonomy and functions.

          • In the shared decision‐making process, it is essential to empower the person, family members, and staff. It is important to elicit the person's cultural, professional, and personal values, using a clear and consistent protocol and well‐established trust.

          • Treatment escalation plans could ensure everyone has a shared understanding of care and treatment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Rigour and qualitative research.

            N Mays, C Pope (1995)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Qualitative interviews in medical research.

              N Britten (1995)
              Much qualitative research is interview based, and this paper provides an outline of qualitative interview techniques and their application in medical settings. It explains the rationale for these techniques and shows how they can be used to research kinds of questions that are different from those dealt with by quantitative methods. Different types of qualitative interviews are described, and the way in which they differ from clinical consultations is emphasised. Practical guidance for conducting such interviews is given.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                n.m.davies@ucl.ac.uk
                Journal
                Int J Geriatr Psychiatry
                Int J Geriatr Psychiatry
                10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1166
                GPS
                International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0885-6230
                1099-1166
                07 February 2023
                February 2023
                : 38
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1002/gps.v38.2 )
                : e5884
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department UCL Division of Psychiatry University College London London UK
                [ 2 ] Department of Psychiatry Faculty of Medicine Prince of Songkla University Hat Yai Thailand
                [ 3 ] Department of Psychological Medicine Royal London Hospital East London NHS Foundation Trust London UK
                [ 4 ] Centre for Ageing Population Studies Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health University College London London UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Nathan Davies

                Email: n.m.davies@ 123456ucl.ac.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3190-4355
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8929-7362
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7757-5353
                Article
                GPS5884
                10.1002/gps.5884
                10108087
                36750227
                0da8e8ec-cfff-4bf5-b211-31cb6e483493
                © 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 18 October 2022
                : 24 January 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Pages: 11, Words: 7858
                Funding
                Funded by: Marie Curie , doi 10.13039/501100000654;
                Award ID: MCCC‐FCO‐16‐U
                Funded by: Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University , doi 10.13039/501100010804;
                Funded by: Alzheimer's Society , doi 10.13039/501100000320;
                Award ID: AS‐JF‐16b‐012
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                February 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.7 mode:remove_FC converted:17.04.2023

                Geriatric medicine
                alzheimer's disease,caregiver,decision,hospital care,person‐centred care,qualitative research

                Comments

                Comment on this article