25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Green spaces and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          Green spaces have been proposed to be a health determinant, improving health and wellbeing through different mechanisms. We aimed to systematically review the epidemiological evidence from longitudinal studies that have investigated green spaces and their association with all-cause mortality. We aimed to evaluate this evidence with a meta-analysis, to determine exposure-response functions for future quantitative health impact assessments.

          Methods

          We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies on green spaces and all-cause mortality. We searched for studies published and indexed in MEDLINE before Aug 20, 2019, which we complemented with an additional search of cited literature. We included studies if their design was longitudinal; the exposure of interest was measured green space; the endpoint of interest was all-cause mortality; they provided a risk estimate (ie, a hazard ratio [HR]) and the corresponding 95% CI for the association between green space exposure and all-cause mortality; and they used normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) as their green space exposure definition. Two investigators (DR-R and DP-L) independently screened the full-text articles for inclusion. We used a random-effects model to obtain pooled HRs. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42018090315.

          Findings

          We identified 9298 studies in MEDLINE and 13 studies that were reported in the literature but not indexed in MEDLINE, of which 9234 (99%) studies were excluded after screening the titles and abstracts and 68 (88%) of 77 remaining studies were excluded after assessment of the full texts. We included nine (12%) studies in our quantitative evaluation, which comprised 8 324 652 individuals from seven countries. Seven (78%) of the nine studies found a significant inverse relationship between an increase in surrounding greenness per 0·1 NDVI in a buffer zone of 500 m or less and the risk of all-cause mortality, but two studies found no association. The pooled HR for all-cause mortality per increment of 0·1 NDVI within a buffer of 500 m or less of a participant's residence was 0·96 (95% CI 0·94–0·97; I 2, 95%).

          Interpretation

          We found evidence of an inverse association between surrounding greenness and all-cause mortality. Interventions to increase and manage green spaces should therefore be considered as a strategic public health intervention.

          Funding

          World Health Organization.

          Related collections

          Most cited references85

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Urban greening to cool towns and cities: A systematic review of the empirical evidence

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation?

            To investigate the strength of the relation between the amount of green space in people's living environment and their perceived general health. This relation is analysed for different age and socioeconomic groups. Furthermore, it is analysed separately for urban and more rural areas, because the strength of the relation was expected to vary with urbanity. The study includes 250 782 people registered with 104 general practices who filled in a self administered form on sociodemographic background and perceived general health. The percentage of green space (urban green space, agricultural space, natural green space) within a one kilometre and three kilometre radius around the postal code coordinates was calculated for each household. Multilevel logistic regression analyses were performed at three levels-that is, individual level, family level, and practice level-controlled for sociodemographic characteristics. The percentage of green space inside a one kilometre and a three kilometre radius had a significant relation to perceived general health. The relation was generally present at all degrees of urbanity. The overall relation is somewhat stronger for lower socioeconomic groups. Elderly, youth, and secondary educated people in large cities seem to benefit more from presence of green areas in their living environment than other groups in large cities. This research shows that the percentage of green space in people's living environment has a positive association with the perceived general health of residents. Green space seems to be more than just a luxury and consequently the development of green space should be allocated a more central position in spatial planning policy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Lancet Planet Health
                Lancet Planet Health
                The Lancet. Planetary Health
                Elsevier B.V
                2542-5196
                1 November 2019
                November 2019
                : 3
                : 11
                : e469-e477
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
                [b ]ISGlobal, Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology, Barcelona, Spain
                [c ]Municipal Institute of Medical Research, Barcelona, Spain
                [d ]Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
                [e ]CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain
                [f ]Unidad Docente de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
                [g ]Department of Public Health, Environmental and Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence to: Dr David Rojas-Rueda, Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA david.rojas@ 123456colostate.edu
                Article
                S2542-5196(19)30215-3
                10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30215-3
                6873641
                31777338
                0ec4ca57-17f9-4a31-8065-327e8ac4721e
                © 2019 World Health Organization

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article