9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Analysis of the severity of occupational injuries in the mining industry using a Bayesian network

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVES

          Occupational injuries are known to be the main adverse outcome of occupational accidents. The purpose of the current study was to identify control strategies to reduce the severity of occupational injuries in the mining industry using Bayesian network (BN) analysis.

          METHODS

          The BN structure was created using a focus group technique. Data on 425 mining accidents was collected, and the required information was extracted. The expectation-maximization algorithm was used to estimate the conditional probability tables. Belief updating was used to determine which factors had the greatest effect on severity of accidents.

          RESULTS

          Based on sensitivity analyses of the BN, training, type of accident, and activity type of workers were the most important factors influencing the severity of accidents. Of individual factors, workers’ experience had the strongest influence on the severity of accidents.

          CONCLUSIONS

          Among the examined factors, safety training was the most important factor influencing the severity of accidents. Organizations may be able to reduce the severity of occupational injuries by holding safety training courses prepared based on the activity type of workers.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Contributing factors in construction accidents.

          This overview paper draws together findings from previous focus group research and studies of 100 individual construction accidents. Pursuing issues raised by the focus groups, the accident studies collected qualitative information on the circumstances of each incident and the causal influences involved. Site based data collection entailed interviews with accident-involved personnel and their supervisor or manager, inspection of the accident location, and review of appropriate documentation. Relevant issues from the site investigations were then followed up with off-site stakeholders, including designers, manufacturers and suppliers. Levels of involvement of key factors in the accidents were: problems arising from workers or the work team (70% of accidents), workplace issues (49%), shortcomings with equipment (including PPE) (56%), problems with suitability and condition of materials (27%), and deficiencies with risk management (84%). Employing an ergonomics systems approach, a model is proposed, indicating the manner in which originating managerial, design and cultural factors shape the circumstances found in the work place, giving rise to the acts and conditions which, in turn, lead to accidents. It is argued that attention to the originating influences will be necessary for sustained improvement in construction safety to be achieved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Identifying Root Causes of Construction Accidents

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Relative effectiveness of worker safety and health training methods.

              We sought to determine the relative effectiveness of different methods of worker safety and health training aimed at improving safety knowledge and performance and reducing negative outcomes (accidents, illnesses, and injuries). Ninety-five quasi-experimental studies (n=20991) were included in the analysis. Three types of intervention methods were distinguished on the basis of learners' participation in the training process: least engaging (lecture, pamphlets, videos), moderately engaging (programmed instruction, feedback interventions), and most engaging (training in behavioral modeling, hands-on training). As training methods became more engaging (i.e., requiring trainees' active participation), workers demonstrated greater knowledge acquisition, and reductions were seen in accidents, illnesses, and injuries. All methods of training produced meaningful behavioral performance improvements. Training involving behavioral modeling, a substantial amount of practice, and dialogue is generally more effective than other methods of safety and health training. The present findings challenge the current emphasis on more passive computer-based and distance training methods within the public health workforce.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Epidemiol Health
                Epidemiol Health
                EPIH
                Epidemiology and Health
                Korean Society of Epidemiology
                2092-7193
                2019
                11 May 2019
                : 41
                : e2019017
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Center of Excellence for Occupational Health (CEOH) and Occupational Health and Safety Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
                [2 ]Center of Excellence for Occupational Health (CEOH) and Research Center for Health Sciences, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
                [3 ]Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Modeling of Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
                [4 ]Golgohar Mining and Industrial Company, Sirjan, Iran
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Hamed Aghaei  Center of Excellence for Occupational Health (CEOH) and Research Center for Health Sciences, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 6517838695, Hamadan, Iran  E-mail: h.aghaei@ 123456umsha.ac.ir
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3772-6780
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3283-2066
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7220-9749
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7483-3502
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3869-3802
                Article
                epih-41-e2019017
                10.4178/epih.e2019017
                6635663
                31096750
                1131adfe-af9e-499c-8f13-ee609bb8641d
                ©2019, Korean Society of Epidemiology

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 20 March 2019
                : 11 May 2019
                Categories
                Original Article

                Public health
                occupational injuries,accident,bayesian approach,mining industry
                Public health
                occupational injuries, accident, bayesian approach, mining industry

                Comments

                Comment on this article