19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Trends in the detection of aquatic non-indigenous species across global marine, estuarine and freshwater ecosystems: A 50-year perspective

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 4 , 7 , 1 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 5 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 7 , 20 , 21 , 10 , 13 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25
      Diversity & distributions
      aquatic non-indigenous species, biological invasions, detection rate, inventory, long-term dataset, population status, richness, spatial patterns, temporal trends, transport pathways

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aim:

          The introduction of aquatic non-indigenous species (ANS) has become a major driver for global changes in species biogeography. We examined spatial patterns and temporal trends of ANS detections since 1965 to inform conservation policy and management.

          Location:

          Global.

          Methods:

          We assembled an extensive dataset of first records of detection of ANS (1965–2015) across 49 aquatic ecosystems, including the (a) year of first collection, (b) population status and (c) potential pathway(s) of introduction. Data were analysed at global and regional levels to assess patterns of detection rate, richness and transport pathways.

          Results:

          An annual mean of 43 (±16 SD) primary detections of ANS occurred–one new detection every 8.4 days for 50 years. The global rate of detections was relatively stable during 1965–1995, but increased rapidly after this time, peaking at roughly 66 primary detections per year during 2005–2010 and then declining marginally. Detection rates were variable within and across regions through time. Arthropods, molluscs and fishes were the most frequently reported ANS. Most ANS were likely introduced as stowaways in ships’ ballast water or biofouling, although direct evidence is typically absent.

          Main conclusions:

          This synthesis highlights the magnitude of recent ANS detections, yet almost certainly represents an underestimate as many ANS go unreported due to limited search effort and diminishing taxonomic expertise. Temporal rates of detection are also confounded by reporting lags, likely contributing to the lower detection rate observed in recent years. There is a critical need to implement standardized, repeated methods across regions and taxa to improve the quality of global-scale comparisons and sustain core measures over longer time-scales. It will be fundamental to fill in knowledge gaps given that invasion data representing broad regions of the world's oceans are not yet readily available and to maintain knowledge pipelines for adaptive management.

          Related collections

          Most cited references114

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide

          Although research on human-mediated exchanges of species has substantially intensified during the last centuries, we know surprisingly little about temporal dynamics of alien species accumulations across regions and taxa. Using a novel database of 45,813 first records of 16,926 established alien species, we show that the annual rate of first records worldwide has increased during the last 200 years, with 37% of all first records reported most recently (1970–2014). Inter-continental and inter-taxonomic variation can be largely attributed to the diaspora of European settlers in the nineteenth century and to the acceleration in trade in the twentieth century. For all taxonomic groups, the increase in numbers of alien species does not show any sign of saturation and most taxa even show increases in the rate of first records over time. This highlights that past efforts to mitigate invasions have not been effective enough to keep up with increasing globalization.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Impacts of biological invasions: what's what and the way forward.

            Study of the impacts of biological invasions, a pervasive component of global change, has generated remarkable understanding of the mechanisms and consequences of the spread of introduced populations. The growing field of invasion science, poised at a crossroads where ecology, social sciences, resource management, and public perception meet, is increasingly exposed to critical scrutiny from several perspectives. Although the rate of biological invasions, elucidation of their consequences, and knowledge about mitigation are growing rapidly, the very need for invasion science is disputed. Here, we highlight recent progress in understanding invasion impacts and management, and discuss the challenges that the discipline faces in its science and interactions with society. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Defining the anthropocene.

              Time is divided by geologists according to marked shifts in Earth's state. Recent global environmental changes suggest that Earth may have entered a new human-dominated geological epoch, the Anthropocene. Here we review the historical genesis of the idea and assess anthropogenic signatures in the geological record against the formal requirements for the recognition of a new epoch. The evidence suggests that of the various proposed dates two do appear to conform to the criteria to mark the beginning of the Anthropocene: 1610 and 1964. The formal establishment of an Anthropocene Epoch would mark a fundamental change in the relationship between humans and the Earth system.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                9891503
                26810
                Divers Distrib
                Divers Distrib
                Diversity & distributions
                1366-9516
                1472-4642
                11 March 2022
                December 2020
                22 March 2023
                : 26
                : 12
                : 1780-1797
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Burlington, ON, Canada
                [2 ]Marine Lab, Marine Scotland Sci, Aberdeen, UK
                [3 ]School of Life and Environmental Science, Deakin University, Geelong, Vic., Australia
                [4 ]MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Agência Regional para o Desenvolvimento da Investigação Tecnologia e Inovação (ARDITI), Madeira Island, Portugal
                [5 ]Smithsonian Environm Res Ctr, Edgewater, MD, USA
                [6 ]Maritime Studies Program, Williams College – Mystic Seaport, Mystic, CT, USA
                [7 ]Faculdade de Ciências, MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
                [8 ]Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
                [9 ]Ifremer, DYNECO, Centre Ifremer de Bretagne, Plouzané, France
                [10 ]Center for Environmental Measurement & Modeling, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
                [11 ]The Steinhardt Museum of Natural History, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
                [12 ]Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, 6150, Western Australia, Australia
                [13 ]National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd., Christchurch, New Zealand
                [14 ]Charles Darwin Research Station, Charles Darwin Foundation, Santa Cruz, Galapagos, Ecuador
                [15 ]University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON, Canada
                [16 ]Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
                [17 ]Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre, Fisheries & Oceans Canada, St John's, NL, Canada
                [18 ]Pärnu College, University of Tartu, Pärnu, Estonia
                [19 ]National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
                [20 ]Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Evolução, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
                [21 ]Department of Botany and Zoology, Centre for Invasion Biology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenboch, South Africa
                [22 ]Instituto de Biología de Organismos Marinos (IBIOMAR-CONICET), Puerto Madryn, Argentina
                [23 ]Institute of Marine Biology, NAS of Ukraine, Odessa, Ukraine
                [24 ]Pacific Biological Station, Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Nanaimo, BC, Canada
                [25 ]Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
                Author notes

                BIOSKETCH

                Sarah Bailey is a research scientist with Fisheries and Oceans Canada, where she provides science advice to policymakers concerning aquatic non-indigenous species transported by shipping pathways. Interests and expertise of the group of authors include invasion ecology, marine ecology, conservation biology and/or evolution, focusing on a variety of taxa from freshwater fishes to marine phytoplankton. The authors conduct independent and collaborative research on the patterns, mechanisms, management and/or consequences of species introductions to aquatic environments at multiple spatial and temporal scales, regularly informing policy development at national and international fora.

                Author contributions: S.B. conceived the study, led data analysis and drafting of the manuscript. All authors compiled and critically reviewed data. S.B., J.T.C and P.F. conducted final standardization of data including pathway assignments. A.C., F.C. and J.D. contributed to data analysis. J.T.C., J.D., B.G., G.I., H.O. and G.R. made significant contributions to early drafts of the manuscript. All authors contributed to editing the final manuscript.

                Correspondence: Sarah A. Bailey, Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Fisheries & Oceans Canada, 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, ON, L7S 1A1, Canada. sarah.bailey@ 123456dfo-mpo.gc.ca
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3635-919X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2143-6535
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3748-8893
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1051-4131
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1062-6707
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3260-7192
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4776-9533
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9268-7211
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6859-6512
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9313-833X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4580-0522
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6421-0603
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2742-6063
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5515-1445
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1416-1238
                Article
                EPAPA1781711
                10.1111/ddi.13167
                10031752
                36960319
                13ef41da-86df-4022-b65f-3563a433fc71

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                aquatic non-indigenous species,biological invasions,detection rate,inventory,long-term dataset,population status,richness,spatial patterns,temporal trends,transport pathways

                Comments

                Comment on this article