2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of Brain Atlases and Machine Learning Methods on the Discrimination of Schizophrenia Patients: A Multimodal MRI Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Recently, machine learning techniques have been widely applied in discriminative studies of schizophrenia (SZ) patients with multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); however, the effects of brain atlases and machine learning methods remain largely unknown. In this study, we collected MRI data for 61 first-episode SZ patients (FESZ), 79 chronic SZ patients (CSZ) and 205 normal controls (NC) and calculated 4 MRI measurements, including regional gray matter volume (GMV), regional homogeneity (ReHo), amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation and degree centrality. We systematically analyzed the performance of two classifications (SZ vs NC; FESZ vs CSZ) based on the combinations of three brain atlases, five classifiers, two cross validation methods and 3 dimensionality reduction algorithms. Our results showed that the groupwise whole-brain atlas with 268 ROIs outperformed the other two brain atlases. In addition, the leave-one-out cross validation was the best cross validation method to select the best hyperparameter set, but the classification performances by different classifiers and dimensionality reduction algorithms were quite similar. Importantly, the contributions of input features to both classifications were higher with the GMV and ReHo features of brain regions in the prefrontal and temporal gyri. Furthermore, an ensemble learning method was performed to establish an integrated model, in which classification performance was improved. Taken together, these findings indicated the effects of these factors in constructing effective classifiers for psychiatric diseases and showed that the integrated model has the potential to improve the clinical diagnosis and treatment evaluation of SZ.

          Related collections

          Most cited references88

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain.

          An anatomical parcellation of the spatially normalized single-subject high-resolution T1 volume provided by the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) (D. L. Collins et al., 1998, Trans. Med. Imag. 17, 463-468) was performed. The MNI single-subject main sulci were first delineated and further used as landmarks for the 3D definition of 45 anatomical volumes of interest (AVOI) in each hemisphere. This procedure was performed using a dedicated software which allowed a 3D following of the sulci course on the edited brain. Regions of interest were then drawn manually with the same software every 2 mm on the axial slices of the high-resolution MNI single subject. The 90 AVOI were reconstructed and assigned a label. Using this parcellation method, three procedures to perform the automated anatomical labeling of functional studies are proposed: (1) labeling of an extremum defined by a set of coordinates, (2) percentage of voxels belonging to each of the AVOI intersected by a sphere centered by a set of coordinates, and (3) percentage of voxels belonging to each of the AVOI intersected by an activated cluster. An interface with the Statistical Parametric Mapping package (SPM, J. Ashburner and K. J. Friston, 1999, Hum. Brain Mapp. 7, 254-266) is provided as a freeware to researchers of the neuroimaging community. We believe that this tool is an improvement for the macroscopical labeling of activated area compared to labeling assessed using the Talairach atlas brain in which deformations are well known. However, this tool does not alleviate the need for more sophisticated labeling strategies based on anatomical or cytoarchitectonic probabilistic maps.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for Schizophrenia

            The variable results of positive-negative research with schizophrenics underscore the importance of well-characterized, standardized measurement techniques. We report on the development and initial standardization of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for typological and dimensional assessment. Based on two established psychiatric rating systems, the 30-item PANSS was conceived as an operationalized, drug-sensitive instrument that provides balanced representation of positive and negative symptoms and gauges their relationship to one another and to global psychopathology. It thus constitutes four scales measuring positive and negative syndromes, their differential, and general severity of illness. Study of 101 schizophrenics found the four scales to be normally distributed and supported their reliability and stability. Positive and negative scores were inversely correlated once their common association with general psychopathology was extracted, suggesting that they represent mutually exclusive constructs. Review of five studies involving the PANSS provided evidence of its criterion-related validity with antecedent, genealogical, and concurrent measures, its predictive validity, its drug sensitivity, and its utility for both typological and dimensional assessment.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Bagging predictors

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Neurosci
                Front Neurosci
                Front. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-4548
                1662-453X
                27 July 2021
                2021
                : 15
                : 697168
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Material Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology , Guangzhou, China
                [2] 2Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Translational Medicine of Mental Disorders , Guangzhou, China
                [3] 3National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction, South China University of Technology , Guangzhou, China
                [4] 4The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Huiai Hospital , Guangzhou, China
                [5] 5Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Diagnosis and Rehabilitation of Dementia , Guangzhou, China
                [6] 6National Engineering Research Center for Healthcare Devices , Guangzhou, China
                [7] 7Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology , Newark, NJ, United States
                [8] 8Department of Radiology, Panyu Central Hospital of Guangzhou , Guangzhou, China
                [9] 9Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering of Guangdong Province, South China University of Technology , Guangzhou, China
                [10] 10Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University , Sendai, Japan
                Author notes

                Edited by: Ahmed Shalaby, University of Louisville, United States

                Reviewed by: Stavros I. Dimitriadis, Greek Association of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders, Greece; Lotfi Chaari, UMR5505 Institut de Recherche en Informatique de Toulouse (IRIT), France

                *Correspondence: Fengchun Wu, 13580380071@ 123456163.com

                This article was submitted to Brain Imaging Methods, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience

                Article
                10.3389/fnins.2021.697168
                8353157
                34385901
                1c7a52f2-136f-412b-8e2c-e61c72894971
                Copyright © 2021 Zang, Huang, Kong, Lei, Ke, Li, Zhou, Xiong, Li, Chen, Li, Xiang, Ning, Wu and Wu.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 19 April 2021
                : 07 July 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 2, Equations: 3, References: 89, Pages: 13, Words: 0
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Original Research

                Neurosciences
                multimodal mri,schizophrenia,brain atlas,machine learning,classification
                Neurosciences
                multimodal mri, schizophrenia, brain atlas, machine learning, classification

                Comments

                Comment on this article