7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bone-conduction hyperacusis induced by superior canal dehiscence in human: the underlying mechanism

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Our ability to hear through bone conduction (BC) has long been recognized, but the underlying mechanism is poorly understood. Why certain perturbations affect BC hearing is also unclear. An example is BC hyperacusis (hypersensitive BC hearing)—an unnerving symptom experienced by patients with superior canal dehiscence (SCD). We measured BC-evoked sound pressures in scala vestibuli ( P SV ) and scala tympani ( P ST ) at the basal cochlea in cadaveric human ears, and estimated hearing by the cochlear input drive ( P DIFF  =  P SV  –  P ST ) before and after creating an SCD. Consistent with clinical audiograms, SCD increased BC-driven P DIFF below 1 kHz. However, SCD affected the individual scalae pressures in unexpected ways: SCD increased P SV below 1 kHz, but had little effect on P ST . These new findings are inconsistent with the inner-ear compression mechanism that some have used to explain BC hyperacusis. We developed a computational BC model based on the inner-ear fluid-inertia mechanism, and the simulated effects of SCD were similar to the experimental findings. This experimental-modeling study suggests that (1) inner-ear fluid inertia is an important mechanism for BC hearing, and (2) SCD facilitates the flow of sound volume velocity through the cochlear partition at low frequencies, resulting in BC hyperacusis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome: Lessons from the First 20 Years

          Superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome was first reported by Lloyd Minor and colleagues in 1998. Patients with a dehiscence in the bone overlying the superior semicircular canal experience symptoms of pressure or sound-induced vertigo, bone conduction hyperacusis, and pulsatile tinnitus. The initial series of patients were diagnosed based on common symptoms, a physical examination finding of eye movements in the plane of the superior semicircular canal when ear canal pressure or loud tones were applied to the ear, and high-resolution computed tomography imaging demonstrating a dehiscence in the bone over the superior semicircular canal. Research productivity directed at understanding better methods for diagnosing and treating this condition has substantially increased over the last two decades. We now have a sound understanding of the pathophysiology of third mobile window syndromes, higher resolution imaging protocols, and several sensitive and specific diagnostic tests. Furthermore, we have a treatment (surgical occlusion of the superior semicircular canal) that has demonstrated efficacy. This review will highlight some of the fundamental insights gained in SCDS, propose diagnostic criteria, and discuss future research directions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Bone-conducted sound: physiological and clinical aspects.

            The fact that vibration of the skull causes a hearing sensation has been known since the 19th century. This mode of hearing was termed hearing by bone conduction. Although there has been more than a century of research on hearing by bone conduction, its physiology is not completely understood. Lately, new insights into the physiology of hearing by bone conduction have been reported. Knowledge of the physiology, clinical aspects, and limitations of bone conduction sound is important for clinicians dealing with hearing loss and is the purpose of this review. The data were compiled from the published literature in the areas of clinical bone conduction hearing, bone conduction hearing aids, basic research on bone conduction physiology, and recent research on bone conduction hearing from our laboratory. Five factors contributing to bone conduction hearing have been identified: 1) sound radiated into the external ear canal, 2) middle ear ossicle inertia, 3) inertia of the cochlear fluids, 4) compression of the cochlear walls, and 5) pressure transmission from the cerebrospinal fluid. Of these five, inertia of the cochlear fluid seems most important. Bone conduction sound is believed to reflect the true cochlear function; however, certain conditions such as middle ear diseases can affect bone conduction sensitivity, but less than for air conduction. The bone conduction route can also be used for hearing aids; since the bone conduction route is less efficient than the air conduction route, bone conduction hearing aids are primarily used for hearing losses where air conduction hearing aids are contraindicated.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Superior semicircular canal dehiscence presenting as conductive hearing loss without vertigo.

              The objective of this study was to describe superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) presenting as otherwise unexplained conductive hearing loss without vestibular symptoms. Retrospective. Tertiary referral center. The study comprised 8 patients (10 ears), 5 males and 5 females aged 27 to 59 years. All 10 ears had SSCD on high-resolution computed tomography scan of the temporal bone. DIAGNOSTIC TESTS AND RESULTS: All 10 ears had significant conductive hearing loss. The air-bone gaps were largest in the lower frequencies at 250, 500, and 1000 Hz; the mean gaps for these 3 frequencies for the 10 ears were 49, 37, and 35 dB, respectively. Bone-conduction thresholds below 2000 Hz were negative (-5 dB to -15 dB) at one or more frequencies in 8 of the 10 ears. There were no middle ear abnormalities to explain the air-bone gaps in these 10 ears. Computed tomography scan and laboratory testing indicated lack of middle ear pathology; acoustic reflexes were present, vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) were present with abnormally low thresholds, and umbo velocity measured by laser Doppler vibrometry was above mean normal. Middle ear exploration was negative in six ears; of these six, stapedectomy had been performed in three ears and ossiculoplasty in two ears, but the air-bone gap was unchanged postoperatively. The data are consistent with the hypothesis that the SSCD introduced a third mobile window into the inner ear, which in turn produced the conductive hearing loss by 1) shunting air-conducted sound away from the cochlea, thus elevating air-conduction thresholds; and 2) increasing the difference in impedance between the oval and round windows, thus improving thresholds for bone-conducted sound. SSCD can present with a conductive hearing loss that mimics otosclerosis and could explain some cases of persistent conductive hearing loss after uneventful stapedectomy. Audiometric testing with attention to absolute bone-conduction thresholds, acoustic reflex testing, VEMP testing, laser vibrometry of the umbo, and computed tomograph scanning can help to identify patients with SSCD presenting with conductive hearing loss without vertigo.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                xiying_guan@meei.harvard.edu
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                6 October 2020
                6 October 2020
                2020
                : 10
                : 16564
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.38142.3c, ISNI 000000041936754X, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, , Harvard Medical School, ; Boston, MA USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.39479.30, ISNI 0000 0000 8800 3003, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, ; Boston, MA USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.240324.3, ISNI 0000 0001 2109 4251, New York University Medical Center, ; New York, NY USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.21107.35, ISNI 0000 0001 2171 9311, Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, , Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, ; Baltimore, MD USA
                Article
                73565
                10.1038/s41598-020-73565-4
                7538896
                33024221
                234a00bd-e0eb-4e4d-b163-4591bd3e1e52
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 8 May 2020
                : 17 September 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, National Institutes of Health;
                Award ID: R21DC017251
                Award ID: R01DC013303
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100002046, Hearing Health Foundation;
                Award ID: Emerging Research Grant 2016
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Uncategorized
                diseases,medical research
                Uncategorized
                diseases, medical research

                Comments

                Comment on this article