38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Behavioural responses of Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto M and S molecular form larvae to an aquatic predator in Burkina Faso

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Predation of aquatic immature stages has been identified as a major evolutionary force driving habitat segregation and niche partitioning in the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto in the humid savannahs of Burkina Faso, West Africa. Here, we explored behavioural responses to the presence of a predator in wild populations of the M and S molecular forms of An. gambiae that typically breed in permanent (e.g., rice field paddies) and temporary (e.g., road ruts) water collections.

          Methods

          Larvae used in these experiments were obtained from eggs laid by wild female An. gambiae collected from two localities in south-western Burkina Faso during the 2008 rainy season. Single larvae were observed in an experimental arena, and behavioural traits were recorded and quantified a) in the absence of a predator and b) in the presence of a widespread mosquito predator, the backswimmer Anisops jaczewskii. Differences in the proportion of time allocated to each behaviour were assessed using Principal Component Analysis and Multivariate Analysis of Variance.

          Results

          The behaviour of M and S form larvae was found to differ significantly; although both forms mainly foraged at the water surface, spending 60-90% of their time filtering water at the surface or along the wall of the container, M form larvae spent on average significantly more time browsing at the bottom of the container than S form larvae (4.5 vs. 1.3% of their overall time, respectively; P < 0.05). In the presence of a predator, larvae of both forms modified their behaviour, spending significantly more time resting along the container wall ( P < 0.001). This change in behaviour was at least twice as great in the M form (from 38.6 to 66.6% of the time at the wall in the absence and presence of the predator, respectively) than in the S form (from 48.3 to 64.1%). Thrashing at the water surface exposed larvae to a significantly greater risk of predation by the notonectid ( P < 0.01), whereas predation occurred significantly less often when larvae were at the container wall ( P < 0.05) and might reflect predator vigilance.

          Conclusions

          Behavioural differences between larvae of the M and S form of An. gambiae in response to an acute predation risk is likely to be a reflection of different trade-offs between foraging and predator vigilance that might be of adaptive value in contrasting aquatic ecosystems. Future studies should explore the relevance of these findings under the wide range of natural settings where both forms co-exist in Africa.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Temporal Variation in Danger Drives Antipredator Behavior: The Predation Risk Allocation Hypothesis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Predation, Competition, and Prey Communities: A Review of Field Experiments

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Parasit Vectors
                Parasit Vectors
                Parasites & Vectors
                BioMed Central
                1756-3305
                2012
                31 March 2012
                : 5
                : 65
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), UMR IRD224-CNRS 5290-Université de Montpellier 1-Université de Montpellier 2 MIVEGEC (Maladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs: Ecologie, Genetique, Evolution et Contrôle), team BEES (Biology, Ecology and Evolution of vector Systems), 911 Avenue Agropolis, Montpellier, BP 64501 34394, France
                [2 ]Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS), Direction Régionale de l'Ouest (DRO), 399 Avenue de la Liberté, Bobo-Dioulasso 01 BP 545, Burkina Faso
                [3 ]Sezione di Parassitologia, Dipartimento di Sanità Pubblica e Malattie Infettive, Università di Roma "Sapienza", P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Roma, Italy. Institut Pasteur - Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti, P.le Aldo Moro 5, Roma 00185, Italy
                [4 ]Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier (ISEM), UMR 5554-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université de Montpellier 2, Université de Montpellier 2, Montpellier CC 065, 34095, France
                Article
                1756-3305-5-65
                10.1186/1756-3305-5-65
                3352179
                22463735
                280a13ee-088b-45df-a5ad-53bf813050dd
                Copyright ©2012 Gimonneau et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 6 July 2011
                : 31 March 2012
                Categories
                Research

                Parasitology
                Parasitology

                Comments

                Comment on this article