6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Emergency Care Gap in Brazil: Geographical Accessibility as a Proxy of Response Capacity to Tackle COVID-19

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: The new coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has claimed thousands of lives worldwide and disrupted the health system in many countries. As the national emergency care capacity is a crucial part of the COVID-19 response, we evaluated the Brazilian Health Care System response preparedness against the COVID-19 pandemic.

          Methods: A retrospective and ecological study was performed with data retrieved from the Brazilian Information Technology Department of the Public Health Care System. The numbers of intensive care (ICU) and hospital beds, general or intensivist physicians, nurses, nursing technicians, physiotherapists, and ventilators from each health region were extracted. Beds per health professionals and ventilators per population rates were assessed. A health service accessibility index was created using a two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA). A spatial analysis using Getis-Ord Gi * was performed to identify areas lacking access to high-complexity centers (HCC).

          Results: As of February 2020, Brazil had 35,682 ICU beds, 426,388 hospital beds, and 65,411 ventilators. In addition, 17,240 new ICU beds were created in June 2020. The South and Southeast regions have the highest rates of professionals and infrastructure to attend patients with COVID-19 compared with the northern region. The north region has the lowest accessibility to ICUs.

          Conclusions: The Brazilian Health Care System is unevenly distributed across the country. The inequitable distribution of health facilities, equipment, and human resources led to inadequate preparedness to manage the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, the ineffectiveness of public measures of the municipal and federal administrations aggravated the pandemic in Brazil.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          World Health Organization declares global emergency: A review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19)

          An unprecedented outbreak of pneumonia of unknown aetiology in Wuhan City, Hubei province in China emerged in December 2019. A novel coronavirus was identified as the causative agent and was subsequently termed COVID-19 by the World Health Organization (WHO). Considered a relative of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), COVID-19 is caused by a betacoronavirus named SARS-CoV-2 that affects the lower respiratory tract and manifests as pneumonia in humans. Despite rigorous global containment and quarantine efforts, the incidence of COVID-19 continues to rise, with 90,870 laboratory-confirmed cases and over 3,000 deaths worldwide. In response to this global outbreak, we summarise the current state of knowledge surrounding COVID-19.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Critical Supply Shortages — The Need for Ventilators and Personal Protective Equipment during the Covid-19 Pandemic

            New England Journal of Medicine
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Intensive care management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): challenges and recommendations

              Summary As coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spreads across the world, the intensive care unit (ICU) community must prepare for the challenges associated with this pandemic. Streamlining of workflows for rapid diagnosis and isolation, clinical management, and infection prevention will matter not only to patients with COVID-19, but also to health-care workers and other patients who are at risk from nosocomial transmission. Management of acute respiratory failure and haemodynamics is key. ICU practitioners, hospital administrators, governments, and policy makers must prepare for a substantial increase in critical care bed capacity, with a focus not just on infrastructure and supplies, but also on staff management. Critical care triage to allow the rationing of scarce ICU resources might be needed. Researchers must address unanswered questions, including the role of repurposed and experimental therapies. Collaboration at the local, regional, national, and international level offers the best chance of survival for the critically ill.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Public Health
                Front Public Health
                Front. Public Health
                Frontiers in Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2565
                16 November 2021
                2021
                16 November 2021
                : 9
                : 740284
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Graduate Program in Biosciences and Physiopathology, State University of Maringá , Paraná, Brazil
                [2] 2Graduate Program in Health Sciences, State University of Maringá , Paraná, Brazil
                [3] 3Department of Medicine, State University of Maringá , Paraná, Brazil
                [4] 4Faculty of Economic Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais , Belo Horizonte, Brazil
                [5] 5Global Emergency Medicine Innovation and Implementation (GEMINI), Division of Emergency Medicine, Duke Global Health Institute , Durham, NC, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Connie J. Evashwick, George Washington University, United States

                Reviewed by: Carolina Ruiz, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile; Ana Maria Malik, Escola de Administração da Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV-EAESP), Brazil

                *Correspondence: Rosilene Fressatti Cardoso rfcardoso@ 123456uem.br

                This article was submitted to Public Health Policy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health

                †These authors have contributed equally to this work and share last authorship

                Article
                10.3389/fpubh.2021.740284
                8634954
                34869155
                29c5449a-8f53-4a57-916d-7c6963bc8180
                Copyright © 2021 Silva, Carvalho Dutra, Andrade, Iora, Rodrigues Ramajo, Peres Gualda, Costa Scheidt, Vasconcelos Maia do Amaral, Hernandes Rocha, Staton, Nickenig Vissoci and Fressatti Cardoso.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 12 July 2021
                : 07 October 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 34, Pages: 10, Words: 5701
                Categories
                Public Health
                Original Research

                covid-19,epidemiology,spatial analysis,public health,health services accessibility

                Comments

                Comment on this article