2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Machine-guided design of synthetic cell type-specific cis-regulatory elements

      Preprint
      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cis-regulatory elements (CREs) control gene expression, orchestrating tissue identity, developmental timing, and stimulus responses, which collectively define the thousands of unique cell types in the body. While there is great potential for strategically incorporating CREs in therapeutic or biotechnology applications that require tissue specificity, there is no guarantee that an optimal CRE for an intended purpose has arisen naturally through evolution. Here, we present a platform to engineer and validate synthetic CREs capable of driving gene expression with programmed cell type specificity. We leverage innovations in deep neural network modeling of CRE activity across three cell types, efficient in silico optimization, and massively parallel reporter assays (MPRAs) to design and empirically test thousands of CREs. Through in vitro and in vivo validation, we show that synthetic sequences outperform natural sequences from the human genome in driving cell type-specific expression. Synthetic sequences leverage unique sequence syntax to promote activity in the on-target cell type and simultaneously reduce activity in off-target cells. Together, we provide a generalizable framework to prospectively engineer CREs and demonstrate the required literacy to write regulatory code that is fit-for-purpose in vivo across vertebrates.

          Related collections

          Most cited references93

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features

          Motivation: Testing for correlations between different sets of genomic features is a fundamental task in genomics research. However, searching for overlaps between features with existing web-based methods is complicated by the massive datasets that are routinely produced with current sequencing technologies. Fast and flexible tools are therefore required to ask complex questions of these data in an efficient manner. Results: This article introduces a new software suite for the comparison, manipulation and annotation of genomic features in Browser Extensible Data (BED) and General Feature Format (GFF) format. BEDTools also supports the comparison of sequence alignments in BAM format to both BED and GFF features. The tools are extremely efficient and allow the user to compare large datasets (e.g. next-generation sequencing data) with both public and custom genome annotation tracks. BEDTools can be combined with one another as well as with standard UNIX commands, thus facilitating routine genomics tasks as well as pipelines that can quickly answer intricate questions of large genomic datasets. Availability and implementation: BEDTools was written in C++. Source code and a comprehensive user manual are freely available at http://code.google.com/p/bedtools Contact: aaronquinlan@gmail.com; imh4y@virginia.edu Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities.

            Genome-scale studies have revealed extensive, cell type-specific colocalization of transcription factors, but the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate in macrophages and B cells that collaborative interactions of the common factor PU.1 with small sets of macrophage- or B cell lineage-determining transcription factors establish cell-specific binding sites that are associated with the majority of promoter-distal H3K4me1-marked genomic regions. PU.1 binding initiates nucleosome remodeling, followed by H3K4 monomethylation at large numbers of genomic regions associated with both broadly and specifically expressed genes. These locations serve as beacons for additional factors, exemplified by liver X receptors, which drive both cell-specific gene expression and signal-dependent responses. Together with analyses of transcription factor binding and H3K4me1 patterns in other cell types, these studies suggest that simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors can specify the genomic sites ultimately responsible for both cell identity and cell type-specific responses to diverse signaling inputs. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Engineering precision nanoparticles for drug delivery

              In recent years, the development of nanoparticles has expanded into a broad range of clinical applications. Nanoparticles have been developed to overcome the limitations of free therapeutics and navigate biological barriers — systemic, microenvironmental and cellular — that are heterogeneous across patient populations and diseases. Overcoming this patient heterogeneity has also been accomplished through precision therapeutics, in which personalized interventions have enhanced therapeutic efficacy. However, nanoparticle development continues to focus on optimizing delivery platforms with a one-size-fits-all solution. As lipid-based, polymeric and inorganic nanoparticles are engineered in increasingly specified ways, they can begin to be optimized for drug delivery in a more personalized manner, entering the era of precision medicine. In this Review, we discuss advanced nanoparticle designs utilized in both non-personalized and precision applications that could be applied to improve precision therapies. We focus on advances in nanoparticle design that overcome heterogeneous barriers to delivery, arguing that intelligent nanoparticle design can improve efficacy in general delivery applications while enabling tailored designs for precision applications, thereby ultimately improving patient outcome overall.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                bioRxiv
                BIORXIV
                bioRxiv
                Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
                09 August 2023
                : 2023.08.08.552077
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
                [2 ]Harvard Graduate Program in Biological and Biomedical Science, Boston MA
                [3 ]Department Of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
                [4 ]Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA
                [5 ]The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA
                [6 ]Harvard College, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
                [7 ]Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, University of Maine, Orono, ME, USA
                [8 ]Department of Comparative Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
                [9 ]Yale Zebrafish Research Core, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
                [10 ]Department of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
                [11 ]Wu Tsai Institute, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
                [12 ]Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
                Author notes
                [*]

                Contributed equally

                [†]

                Jointly supervised this work

                Author Contributions

                SJG initiated the model-guided sequence design framework. SJG, RIC, SKR, and RT developed the full study and designed experiments. SJG and RIC developed the CODA software library, Malinois model, and produced the synthetic sequences. NF, SK, and SKR conducted in vitro experiments. RRN and KM conducted in vivo experiments. SJG, RIC, NF, JCB, SKR, and RT performed data analysis. SJG, RIC, JCB, PCS, SKR, and RT interpreted results and drafted the manuscript. PCS, SKR and RT secured funding and supervised the study. All of the authors revised the manuscript and accepted its final version.

                [# ] Correspondence: Sager Gosai ( sgosai@ 123456broadinstitute.org ), Rodrigo Castro ( rodrigo.castro@ 123456jax.org ), Steven Reilly ( steven.k.reilly@ 123456yale.edu ), Ryan Tewhey ( ryan.tewhey@ 123456jax.org )
                Article
                10.1101/2023.08.08.552077
                10441439
                37609287
                34486e03-d9da-407c-a56f-1d1b28d30e25

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article