3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Proposed Diagnostic Criteria and Classification of Canine Mast Cell Neoplasms: A Consensus Proposal

      review-article
      1 , 2 , * , 3 , 4 , 5 , 1 , 2 , 6 , 7 , 2 , 6 , 2 , 6 , 2 , 6 , 6 , 8 , 2 , 6 , 2 , 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 12 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 2 , 6
      Frontiers in Veterinary Science
      Frontiers Media S.A.
      canine mast cell neoplasm, classification, grading, staging, KIT mutations, treatment algorithms, targeted therapy

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Mast cell neoplasms are one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies in dogs. The clinical picture, course, and prognosis vary substantially among patients, depending on the anatomic site, grade and stage of the disease. The most frequently involved organ is the skin, followed by hematopoietic organs (lymph nodes, spleen, liver, and bone marrow) and mucosal sites of the oral cavity and the gastrointestinal tract. In cutaneous mast cell tumors, several grading and staging systems have been introduced. However, no comprehensive classification and no widely accepted diagnostic criteria have been proposed to date. To address these open issues and points we organized a Working Conference on canine mast cell neoplasms in Vienna in 2019. The outcomes of this meeting are summarized in this article. The proposed classification includes cutaneous mast cell tumors and their sub-variants defined by grading- and staging results, mucosal mast cell tumors, extracutaneous/extramucosal mast cell tumors without skin involvement, and mast cell leukemia (MCL). For each of these entities, diagnostic criteria are proposed. Moreover, we have refined grading and staging criteria for mast cell neoplasms in dogs based on consensus discussion. The criteria and classification proposed in this article should greatly facilitate diagnostic evaluation and prognostication in dogs with mast cell neoplasms and should thereby support management of these patients in daily practice and the conduct of clinical trials.

          Related collections

          Most cited references99

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Multi-center, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study of oral toceranib phosphate (SU11654), a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, for the treatment of dogs with recurrent (either local or distant) mast cell tumor following surgical excision.

          The purpose of this study was to determine the objective response rate (ORR) following treatment of canine mast cell tumors (MCT) with toceranib phosphate (Palladia, SU11654), a kinase inhibitor with both antitumor and antiangiogenic activity through inhibition of KIT, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, and PDGFRbeta. Secondary objectives were to determine biological response rate, time to tumor progression, duration of objective response, health-related quality of life, and safety of Palladia. Dogs were randomized to receive oral Palladia 3.25 mg/kg or placebo every other day for 6 weeks in the blinded phase. Thereafter, eligible dogs received open-label Palladia. The blinded phase ORR in Palladia-treated dogs (n = 86) was 37.2% (7 complete response, 25 partial response) versus 7.9% (5 partial response) in placebo-treated dogs (n = 63; P = 0.0004). Of 58 dogs that received Palladia following placebo-escape, 41.4% (8 complete response, 16 partial response) experienced objective response. The ORR for all 145 dogs receiving Palladia was 42.8% (21 complete response, 41 partial response); among the 62 responders, the median duration of objective response and time to tumor progression was 12.0 weeks and 18.1 weeks, respectively. Palladia-treated responders scored higher on health-related quality of life versus Palladia-treated nonresponders (P = 0.030). There was no significant difference in the number of dogs with grade 3/4 (of 4) adverse events; adverse events were generally manageable with dose modification and/or supportive care. Palladia has biological activity against canine MCTs and can be administered on a continuous schedule without need for routine planned treatment breaks. This clinical trial further shows that spontaneous tumors in dogs are good models to evaluate therapeutic index of targeted therapeutics in a clinical setting.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Additional mutations in SRSF2, ASXL1 and/or RUNX1 identify a high-risk group of patients with KIT D816V(+) advanced systemic mastocytosis.

            Most patients with KIT D816V(+) advanced systemic mastocytosis (SM) are characterized by somatic mutations in additional genes. We sought to clarify the prognostic impact of such mutations. Genotype and clinical characteristics of 70 multi-mutated KIT D816V(+) advanced SM patients were included in univariate and multivariate analyses. The most frequently identified mutated genes were TET2 (n=33 of 70 patients), SRSF2 (n=30), ASXL1 (n=20), RUNX1 (n=16) and JAK2 (n=11). In univariate analysis, overall survival (OS) was adversely influenced by mutations in SRSF2 (P<0.0001), ASXL1 (P=0.002) and RUNX1 (P=0.03), but was not influenced by mutations in TET2 or JAK2. In multivariate analysis, SRSF2 and ASXL1 remained the most predictive adverse indicators concerning OS. Furthermore, we found that inferior OS and adverse clinical characteristics were significantly influenced by the number of mutated genes in the SRSF2/ASXL1/RUNX1 (S/A/R) panel (P<0.0001). In conclusion, the presence and number of mutated genes within the S/A/R panel are adversely associated with advanced disease and poor survival in KIT D816V(+) SM. On the basis of these findings, inclusion of molecular markers should be considered in upcoming prognostic scoring systems for patients with SM.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Diagnostic criteria and classification of mastocytosis: a consensus proposal.

              The term 'mastocytosis' denotes a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by abnormal growth and accumulation of mast cells (MC) in one or more organ systems. Over the last 20 years, there has been an evolution in accepted classification systems for this disease. In light of such developments and novel useful markers, it seems appropriate now to re-evaluate and update the classification of mastocytosis. Here, we propose criteria to delineate categories of mastocytosis together with an updated consensus classification system. In this proposal, the diagnosis cutaneous mastocytosis (CM) is based on typical clinical and histological skin lesions and absence of definitive signs (criteria) of systemic involvement. Most patients with CM are children and present with maculopapular cutaneous mastocytosis (=urticaria pigmentosa, UP). Other less frequent forms of CM are diffuse cutaneous mastocytosis (DCM) and mastocytoma of skin. Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is commonly seen in adults and defined by multifocal histological lesions in the bone marrow (affected almost invariably) or other extracutaneous organs (major criteria) together with cytological and biochemical signs (minor criteria) of systemic disease (SM-criteria). SM is further divided into the following categories: indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM), SM with an associated clonal hematologic non-mast cell lineage disease (AHNMD), aggressive systemic mastocytosis (ASM), and mast cell leukemia (MCL). Patients with ISM usually have maculopapular skin lesions and a good prognosis. In the group with associated hematologic disease, the AHNMD should be classified according to FAB/WHO criteria. ASM is characterized by impaired organ-function due to infiltration of the bone marrow, liver, spleen, GI-tract, or skeletal system, by pathologic MC. MCL is a 'high-grade' leukemic disease defined by increased numbers of MC in bone marrow smears (>or=20%) and peripheral blood, absence of skin lesions, multiorgan failure, and a short survival. In typical cases, circulating MC amount to >or=10% of leukocytes (classical form of MCL). Mast cell sarcoma is a unifocal tumor that consists of atypical MC and shows a destructive growth without (primary) systemic involvement. This high-grade malignant MC disease has to be distinguished from a localized benign mastocytoma in either extracutaneous organs (=extracutaneous mastocytoma) or skin. Depending on the clinical course of mastocytosis and development of an AHNMD, patients can shift from one category of MC disease into another. In all categories, mediator-related symptoms may occur and may represent a serious clinical problem. All categories of mastocytosis should be distinctively separated from reactive MC hyperplasia, MC activation syndromes, and a more or less pronounced increase in MC in myelogenous malignancies other than mastocytosis. Criteria proposed in this article should be helpful in this regard.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Vet Sci
                Front Vet Sci
                Front. Vet. Sci.
                Frontiers in Veterinary Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2297-1769
                10 December 2021
                2021
                : 8
                : 755258
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department/Hospital for Companion Animals and Horses, Clinic for Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna , Vienna, Austria
                [2] 2Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria
                [3] 3Comparative Medicine and Integrative Biology Program, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University , East Lansing, MI, United States
                [4] 4Department of Veterinary Medical Science, University of Bologna , Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy
                [5] 5Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padua , Padua, Italy
                [6] 6Division of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria
                [7] 7Department of Hematology, Imagine Institute Université de Paris, INSERM U1163, CEREMAST, Necker Hospital , Paris, France
                [8] 8Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria
                [9] 9Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine , Vienna, Austria
                [10] 10Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hanover Medical School , Hanover, Germany
                [11] 11Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, Heidelberg University , Mannheim, Germany
                [12] 12Institute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg , Salzburg, Austria
                [13] 13Center of Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Institute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria
                [14] 14The Interuniversity Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University Vienna, University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria
                [15] 15Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna , Vienna, Austria
                [16] 16Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians University , Munich, Germany
                [17] 17Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, CA, United States
                [18] 18Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, CA, United States
                [19] 19Laboratory of Hematology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital , Paris, France
                [20] 20Department of Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, WI, United States
                [21] 21Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, WI, United States
                [22] 22Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University , East Lansing, MI, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Peter James O'Brien, University College Dublin, Ireland

                Reviewed by: Valeria Grieco, University of Milan, Italy; Barbara C. Rütgen, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria; Mario Cabezas Calvo, VillageVets, Ireland

                *Correspondence: Michael Willmann michael.willmann@ 123456vetmeduni.ac.at

                This article was submitted to Veterinary Experimental and Diagnostic Pathology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Veterinary Science

                Article
                10.3389/fvets.2021.755258
                8702826
                34957277
                35b35cb8-e5ae-4eea-9324-f2c65c442d7e
                Copyright © 2021 Willmann, Yuzbasiyan-Gurkan, Marconato, Dacasto, Hadzijusufovic, Hermine, Sadovnik, Gamperl, Schneeweiss-Gleixner, Gleixner, Böhm, Peter, Eisenwort, Moriggl, Li, Jawhar, Sotlar, Jensen-Jarolim, Sexl, Horny, Galli, Arock, Vail, Kiupel and Valent.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 09 August 2021
                : 12 November 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 99, Pages: 10, Words: 8997
                Funding
                Funded by: Austrian Science Fund, doi 10.13039/501100002428;
                Award ID: F4701-B20
                Award ID: F4704-B20
                Award ID: P32470-B
                Award ID: SFB F4606-B28
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, doi 10.13039/501100001659;
                Award ID: Li 1608/5-1
                Categories
                Veterinary Science
                Review

                canine mast cell neoplasm,classification,grading,staging,kit mutations,treatment algorithms,targeted therapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article