2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Transcriptional signatures in histologic structures within glioblastoma tumors may predict personalized drug sensitivity and survival

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Glioblastoma is a rapidly fatal brain cancer that exhibits extensive intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity. Improving survival will require the development of personalized treatment strategies that can stratify tumors into subtypes that differ in therapeutic vulnerability and outcomes. Glioblastoma stratification has been hampered by intratumoral heterogeneity, limiting our ability to compare tumors in a consistent manner. Here, we develop methods that mitigate the impact of intratumoral heterogeneity on transcriptomic-based patient stratification.

          Methods

          We accessed open-source transcriptional profiles of histological structures from 34 human glioblastomas from the Ivy Glioblastoma Atlas Project. Principal component and correlation network analyses were performed to assess sample inter-relationships. Gene set enrichment analysis was used to identify enriched biological processes and classify glioblastoma subtype. For survival models, Cox proportional hazards regression was utilized. Transcriptional profiles from 156 human glioblastomas were accessed from The Cancer Genome Atlas to externally validate the survival model.

          Results

          We showed that intratumoral histologic architecture influences tumor classification when assessing established subtyping and prognostic gene signatures, and that indiscriminate sampling can produce misleading results. We identified the cellular tumor as a glioblastoma structure that can be targeted for transcriptional analysis to more accurately stratify patients by subtype and prognosis. Based on expression from cellular tumor, we created an improved risk stratification gene signature.

          Conclusions

          Our results highlight that biomarker performance for diagnostics, prognostics, and prediction of therapeutic response can be improved by analyzing transcriptional profiles in pure cellular tumor, which is a critical step toward developing personalized treatment for glioblastoma.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology

          Genomic sequencing has made it clear that a large fraction of the genes specifying the core biological functions are shared by all eukaryotes. Knowledge of the biological role of such shared proteins in one organism can often be transferred to other organisms. The goal of the Gene Ontology Consortium is to produce a dynamic, controlled vocabulary that can be applied to all eukaryotes even as knowledge of gene and protein roles in cells is accumulating and changing. To this end, three independent ontologies accessible on the World-Wide Web (http://www.geneontology.org) are being constructed: biological process, molecular function and cellular component.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy.

            Among the most promising approaches to activating therapeutic antitumour immunity is the blockade of immune checkpoints. Immune checkpoints refer to a plethora of inhibitory pathways hardwired into the immune system that are crucial for maintaining self-tolerance and modulating the duration and amplitude of physiological immune responses in peripheral tissues in order to minimize collateral tissue damage. It is now clear that tumours co-opt certain immune-checkpoint pathways as a major mechanism of immune resistance, particularly against T cells that are specific for tumour antigens. Because many of the immune checkpoints are initiated by ligand-receptor interactions, they can be readily blocked by antibodies or modulated by recombinant forms of ligands or receptors. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4) antibodies were the first of this class of immunotherapeutics to achieve US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Preliminary clinical findings with blockers of additional immune-checkpoint proteins, such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1), indicate broad and diverse opportunities to enhance antitumour immunity with the potential to produce durable clinical responses.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Molecular subclasses of high-grade glioma predict prognosis, delineate a pattern of disease progression, and resemble stages in neurogenesis.

              Previously undescribed prognostic subclasses of high-grade astrocytoma are identified and discovered to resemble stages in neurogenesis. One tumor class displaying neuronal lineage markers shows longer survival, while two tumor classes enriched for neural stem cell markers display equally short survival. Poor prognosis subclasses exhibit markers either of proliferation or of angiogenesis and mesenchyme. Upon recurrence, tumors frequently shift toward the mesenchymal subclass. Chromosomal locations of genes distinguishing tumor subclass parallel DNA copy number differences between subclasses. Functional relevance of tumor subtype molecular signatures is suggested by the ability of cell line signatures to predict neurosphere growth. A robust two-gene prognostic model utilizing PTEN and DLL3 expression suggests that Akt and Notch signaling are hallmarks of poor prognosis versus better prognosis gliomas, respectively.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Neurooncol Adv
                Neurooncol Adv
                noa
                Neuro-oncology Advances
                Oxford University Press (US )
                2632-2498
                Jan-Dec 2020
                03 August 2020
                03 August 2020
                : 2
                : 1
                : vdaa093
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Neurology, Blood-Brain Barrier Program, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, Oregon, USA
                [2 ] Department of Biomedical Engineering, OHSU Center for Spatial Systems Biomedicine, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, Oregon, USA
                [3 ] Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, Oregon, USA
                [4 ] Advanced Imaging Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, Oregon, USA
                [5 ] Department of Neurology, Layton Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, Oregon, USA
                [6 ] Department of Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, Oregon, USA
                [7 ] Department of Neurology and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington, USA
                [8 ] Department of Pathology, Stanford University , Stanford, California, USA
                [9 ] Department of Neurosurgery, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, Oregon, USA
                [10 ] Office of Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center , Portland, Oregon, USA
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Edward A. Neuwelt, MD, Oregon Health and Science University, Blood Brain Barrier and Neuro-Oncology Program, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, L603, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA ( neuwelte@ 123456ohsu.edu ).
                Present address: Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                vdaa093
                10.1093/noajnl/vdaa093
                7462280
                32904984
                363e7663-55c8-4eea-9fbf-0cbd4f933530
                © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 01 September 2020
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health, DOI 10.13039/100000002;
                Award ID: CA199111
                Award ID: CA137488
                Award ID: NCI 1K08CA237809-01A1
                Funded by: Veterans Administration Merit Review;
                Award ID: BX003897
                Funded by: Jonathan D. Lewis Foundation;
                Funded by: Walter S. and Lucienne Driskill Foundation, DOI 10.13039/100007155;
                Funded by: ProspectCreek Foundation;
                Funded by: NCI Cancer Systems Biology Consortium Center;
                Award ID: 5U54CA209988
                Award ID: 2P30CA069533
                Categories
                Basic and Translational Investigations
                AcademicSubjects/MED00300
                AcademicSubjects/MED00310

                gene signature,glioblastoma,heterogeneity,transcriptomics

                Comments

                Comment on this article