1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An overview on CV2/CRMP5 antibody-associated paraneoplastic neurological syndromes

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Paraneoplastic neurological syndrome refers to certain malignant tumors that have affected the distant nervous system and caused corresponding dysfunction in the absence of tumor metastasis. Patients with this syndrome produce multiple antibodies, each targeting a different antigen and causing different symptoms and signs. The CV2/collapsin response mediator protein 5 (CRMP5) antibody is a major antibody of this type. It damages the nervous system, which often manifests as limbic encephalitis, chorea, ocular manifestation, cerebellar ataxia, myelopathy, and peripheral neuropathy. Detecting CV2/CRMP5 antibody is crucial for the clinical diagnosis of paraneoplastic neurological syndrome, and anti-tumor and immunological therapies can help to alleviate symptoms and improve prognosis. However, because of the low incidence of this disease, few reports and no reviews have been published about it so far. This article intends to review the research on CV2/CRMP5 antibody-associated paraneoplastic neurological syndrome and summarize its clinical features to help clinicians comprehensively understand the disease. Additionally, this review discusses the current challenges that this disease poses, and the application prospects of new detection and diagnostic techniques in the field of paraneoplastic neurological syndrome, including CV2/CRMP5-associated paraneoplastic neurological syndrome, in recent years.

          Related collections

          Most cited references98

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Antibody titres at diagnosis and during follow-up of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: a retrospective study.

          Anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor encephalitis is a severe but treatable autoimmune disorder which diagnosis depends on sensitive and specific antibody testing. We aimed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of serum and CSF antibody testing in patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis, and the relation between titres, relapses, outcome, and epitope repertoire. In this observational study, we used rat brain immunohistochemistry and cell-based assays (CBA) with fixed or live NMDA receptor-expressing cells to determine the sensitivity and specificity of antibody testing in paired serum and CSF samples. Samples were obtained at diagnosis from patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis and from control participants worldwide. We deemed a patient to be antibody positive if their serum, their CSF, or both tested positive with both immunohistochemistry and CBA techniques; we determined titres with serial sample dilution using brain immunohistochemistry. We examined samples from 45 patients (25 with good outcome [modified Rankin Scale, mRS 0-2], ten with poor outcome [mRS 3-6], and ten with relapses) at three or more timepoints. We determined the epitope repertoire in the samples of 23 patients with CBA expressing GluN1-NMDA receptor mutants. We analysed samples from 250 patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis and 100 control participants. All 250 patients had NMDA receptor antibodies in CSF but only 214 had antibodies in serum (sensitivity 100.0% [98.5-1000%] vs 85.6% [80.7-89.4%], p<0.0001). Serum immunohistochemistry testing was more often in agreement with CBA with fixed cells (77 [71%] of 108) than with CBA with live cells (63 [58%] of 108, p=0.0056). In multivariable analysis, CSF and serum titres were higher in patients with poor outcome than in those with good outcome (CSF dilution 340 vs 129, difference 211, [95% CI 1-421], p=0.049; serum dilution 7370 vs 1243, difference 6127 [2369-9885], p=0.0025), and in patients with teratoma than in those without teratoma (CSF 395 vs 110, difference 285 [134-437], p=0.0079; serum 5515 vs 1644, difference 3870 [548-7193], p=0.024). Over time there was a decrease of antibody titres in the 35 patients with good or poor outcome and samples followed at three timepoints regardless of outcome (from diagnosis to last follow-up: CSF 614 to 76, difference 538 [288-788]; serum 5460 to 1564, difference 3896 [2428-5362]; both p<0.0001). Relapses were associated with a change in titre more often in CSF than in serum (14 of 19 vs seven of 16, p=0.037). After recovery, 24 of 28 CSF samples and 17 of 23 serum samples from patients remained antibody positive. Patients' antibodies targeted a main epitope region at GluN1 aminoacid 369; the epitope repertoire did not differ between patients with different outcomes, and did not change during relapses. The sensitivity of NMDA receptor antibody testing is higher in CSF than in serum. Antibody titres in CSF and serum were higher in patients with poor outcome or teratoma than in patients with good outcome or no tumour. The titre change in CSF was more closely related with relapses than was that in serum. These findings emphasise the importance of including CSF in antibody studies, and that antibody titres can complement clinical assessments. Dutch Cancer Society, National Institutes of Health, McKnight Neuroscience of Brain Disorders award, the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias, ErasmusMC fellowship, and Fundació la Marató de TV3. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Recommended diagnostic criteria for paraneoplastic neurological syndromes.

            Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) are defined by the presence of cancer and exclusion of other known causes of the neurological symptoms, but this criterion does not separate "true" PNS from neurological syndromes that are coincidental with a cancer. To provide more rigorous diagnostic criteria for PNS. An international panel of neurologists interested in PNS identified those defined as "classical" in previous studies. The panel reviewed the existing diagnostic criteria and recommended new criteria for those in whom no clinical consensus was reached in the past. The panel reviewed all reported onconeural antibodies and established the conditions to identify those that would be labelled as "well characterised". The antibody information was obtained from published work and from unpublished data from the different laboratories involved in the study. The panel suggest two levels of evidence to define a neurological syndrome as paraneoplastic: "definite" and "possible". Each level can be reached combining a set of criteria based on the presence or absence of cancer and the definitions of "classical" syndrome and "well characterised" onconeural antibody. The proposed criteria should help clinicians in the classification of their patients and the prospective and retrospective analysis of PNS cases.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Updated Diagnostic Criteria for Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes

              Objective The contemporary diagnosis of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNSs) requires an increasing understanding of their clinical, immunologic, and oncologic heterogeneity. The 2004 PNS criteria are partially outdated due to advances in PNS research in the last 16 years leading to the identification of new phenotypes and antibodies that have transformed the diagnostic approach to PNS. Here, we propose updated diagnostic criteria for PNS. Methods A panel of experts developed by consensus a modified set of diagnostic PNS criteria for clinical decision making and research purposes. The panel reappraised the 2004 criteria alongside new knowledge on PNS obtained from published and unpublished data generated by the different laboratories involved in the project. Results The panel proposed to substitute “classical syndromes” with the term “high-risk phenotypes” for cancer and introduce the concept of “intermediate-risk phenotypes.” The term “onconeural antibody” was replaced by “high risk” (>70% associated with cancer) and “intermediate risk” (30%–70% associated with cancer) antibodies. The panel classified 3 levels of evidence for PNS: definite, probable, and possible. Each level can be reached by using the PNS-Care Score, which combines clinical phenotype, antibody type, the presence or absence of cancer, and time of follow-up. With the exception of opsoclonus-myoclonus, the diagnosis of definite PNS requires the presence of high- or intermediate-risk antibodies. Specific recommendations for similar syndromes triggered by immune checkpoint inhibitors are also provided. Conclusions The proposed criteria and recommendations should be used to enhance the clinical care of patients with PNS and to encourage standardization of research initiatives addressing PNS.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Neural Regen Res
                Neural Regen Res
                NRR
                Neural Regen Res
                Neural Regeneration Research
                Wolters Kluwer - Medknow (India )
                1673-5374
                1876-7958
                November 2023
                31 March 2023
                : 18
                : 11
                : 2357-2364
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
                Author notes
                [* ] Correspondence to: Jun Wu, wjun365@ 123456163.com .

                Author contributions: SW and HH prepared the manuscript. SW, YT, SZ, GW, ZG and LZ searched the literature. SW and JW edited the manuscript. JW contributed to the definition of intellectual content and manuscript review. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript .

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4201-9175
                Article
                NRR-18-2357
                10.4103/1673-5374.371400
                10360094
                37282453
                3c02c262-e9c9-4eb3-a2ab-0eb1cd9aa82c
                Copyright: © Neural Regeneration Research

                This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                : 07 October 2022
                : 08 February 2023
                : 04 March 2023
                Categories
                Review

                autoimmunity,crmp5,cv2,cv2/crmp5 antibody,paraneoplastic neurological syndromes,paraneoplastic syndromes,tumor

                Comments

                Comment on this article