145
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Direct reprogramming of somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) can be achieved by overexpression of Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc transcription factors, but only a minority of donor somatic cells can be reprogrammed to pluripotency. Here we demonstrate that reprogramming is a continuous stochastic process where almost all donor cells eventually give rise to iPSCs upon continued growth and transcription factor expression. Additional inhibition the p53/p21 pathway or overexpression of Lin28 increased the cell division rate and resulted in an accelerated kinetics of iPSC formation that was directly proportional to the increase in cell proliferation. In contrast, Nanog overexpression accelerated reprogramming in a predominantly cell division rate independent manner. Quantitative analyses define distinct cell division rate dependent and independent modes for accelerating the stochastic course of reprogramming, and suggest that the number of cell divisions is a key parameter driving epigenetic reprogramming to pluripotency.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences.

          Gene expression is a fundamentally stochastic process, with randomness in transcription and translation leading to cell-to-cell variations in mRNA and protein levels. This variation appears in organisms ranging from microbes to metazoans, and its characteristics depend both on the biophysical parameters governing gene expression and on gene network structure. Stochastic gene expression has important consequences for cellular function, being beneficial in some contexts and harmful in others. These situations include the stress response, metabolism, development, the cell cycle, circadian rhythms, and aging.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes.

            Genetically identical cells exposed to the same environmental conditions can show significant variation in molecular content and marked differences in phenotypic characteristics. This variability is linked to stochasticity in gene expression, which is generally viewed as having detrimental effects on cellular function with potential implications for disease. However, stochasticity in gene expression can also be advantageous. It can provide the flexibility needed by cells to adapt to fluctuating environments or respond to sudden stresses, and a mechanism by which population heterogeneity can be established during cellular differentiation and development.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state.

              Nuclear transplantation can reprogramme a somatic genome back into an embryonic epigenetic state, and the reprogrammed nucleus can create a cloned animal or produce pluripotent embryonic stem cells. One potential use of the nuclear cloning approach is the derivation of 'customized' embryonic stem (ES) cells for patient-specific cell treatment, but technical and ethical considerations impede the therapeutic application of this technology. Reprogramming of fibroblasts to a pluripotent state can be induced in vitro through ectopic expression of the four transcription factors Oct4 (also called Oct3/4 or Pou5f1), Sox2, c-Myc and Klf4. Here we show that DNA methylation, gene expression and chromatin state of such induced reprogrammed stem cells are similar to those of ES cells. Notably, the cells-derived from mouse fibroblasts-can form viable chimaeras, can contribute to the germ line and can generate live late-term embryos when injected into tetraploid blastocysts. Our results show that the biological potency and epigenetic state of in-vitro-reprogrammed induced pluripotent stem cells are indistinguishable from those of ES cells.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0410462
                6011
                Nature
                Nature
                0028-0836
                1476-4687
                29 October 2009
                8 November 2009
                3 December 2009
                3 June 2010
                : 462
                : 7273
                : 595-601
                Affiliations
                [1 ]The Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Massachussets Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142.
                [2 ]Department of Physics, Massachussets Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142.
                [3 ]Department of Biology, Massachussets Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142.
                Author notes
                Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to R.J. ( Jaenisch@ 123456wi.mit.edu ) or J.H. ( Hanna@ 123456wi.mit.edu )
                [*]

                These authors contributed equally to this work

                Article
                nihpa154308
                10.1038/nature08592
                2789972
                19898493
                411ad03a-9239-4219-a506-d3bce605af2d

                Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: National Cancer Institute : NCI
                Funded by: National Institute of Child Health & Human Development : NICHD
                Award ID: R37 CA084198-09 ||CA
                Funded by: National Cancer Institute : NCI
                Funded by: National Institute of Child Health & Human Development : NICHD
                Award ID: R01 HD045022-06 ||HD
                Funded by: National Cancer Institute : NCI
                Funded by: National Institute of Child Health & Human Development : NICHD
                Award ID: R01 CA087869-09 ||CA
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article