0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Predictive Validity of the Danish Psychosocial Work Environment Questionnaire With Regard to Onset of Depressive Disorders and Long-Term Sickness Absence

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To investigate the predictive validity of 32 measures of the Danish Psychosocial Work Environment Questionnaire (DPQ) against two criteria variables: onset of depressive disorders and long-term sickness absence (LTSA).

          Methods

          The DPQ was sent to 8958 employed individuals in 14 job groups of which 4340 responded (response rate: 48.4%). Depressive disorders were measured by self-report with a 6-month follow-up. LTSA was measured with a 1-year follow-up in a national register. We analyzed onset of depressive disorders at follow-up using logistic regression models, adjusted for age, sex, and job group, while excluding respondents with depressive disorders at baseline. We analyzed onset of LTSA with Cox regression models, adjusted for age, sex, and job group, while excluding respondents with previous LTSA.

          Results

          The general pattern of the results followed our hypotheses as high job demands, poorly organized working conditions, poor relations to colleagues and superiors, and negative reactions to the work situation predicted onset of depressive disorders at follow-up and onset of LTSA during follow-up. Analyzing onset of depressive disorders and onset of LTSA, we found risk estimates that deviated from unity in most of the investigated associations. Overall, we found higher risk estimates when analyzing onset of depressive disorders compared with onset of LTSA.

          Conclusions

          The analyses provide support for the predictive validity of most DPQ-measures. Results suggest that the DPQ constitutes a useful tool for identifying risk factors for depression and LTSA in the psychosocial work environment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.

            Interest in the problem of method biases has a long history in the behavioral sciences. Despite this, a comprehensive summary of the potential sources of method biases and how to control for them does not exist. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to examine the extent to which method biases influence behavioral research results, identify potential sources of method biases, discuss the cognitive processes through which method biases influence responses to measures, evaluate the many different procedural and statistical techniques that can be used to control method biases, and provide recommendations for how to select appropriate procedural and statistical remedies for different types of research settings.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Ann Work Expo Health
                Ann Work Expo Health
                annhyg
                Annals of Work Exposures and Health
                Oxford University Press (UK )
                2398-7308
                2398-7316
                March 2023
                15 October 2022
                15 October 2022
                : 67
                : 2
                : 195-207
                Affiliations
                National Research Centre for the Working Environment , Copenhagen, Denmark
                Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, Denmark
                National Research Centre for the Working Environment , Copenhagen, Denmark
                National Research Centre for the Working Environment , Copenhagen, Denmark
                Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, Denmark
                Optum Patient Insights , Johnston, RI, USA
                National Research Centre for the Working Environment , Copenhagen, Denmark
                National Research Centre for the Working Environment , Copenhagen, Denmark
                National Research Centre for the Working Environment , Copenhagen, Denmark
                Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, Denmark
                Author notes
                Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersoe Parkalle 105, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. Tel: +45-39165368; fax: +45-39165201; e-mail: tcl@ 123456nrcwe.dk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4518-5187
                Article
                wxac069
                10.1093/annweh/wxac069
                9923041
                36242547
                5cd0b828-9eb1-49a2-ac57-eec2b01fdc58
                © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 12 January 2022
                : 04 July 2022
                : 14 September 2022
                : 29 August 2022
                Page count
                Pages: 13
                Funding
                Funded by: National Research Centre for the Working Environment;
                Funded by: Danish Work Environment Research Fund;
                Award ID: 66-2017-03
                Categories
                Original Articles
                AcademicSubjects/MED00640

                job characteristics,occupational health,psychosocial work environment,questionnaire,stress,survey,validity,work characteristics,working conditions

                Comments

                Comment on this article