49
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Formal guidelines: management of acute respiratory distress syndrome

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Fifteen recommendations and a therapeutic algorithm regarding the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) at the early phase in adults are proposed. The Grade of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology has been followed. Four recommendations (low tidal volume, plateau pressure limitation, no oscillatory ventilation, and prone position) had a high level of proof (GRADE 1 + or 1 −); four (high positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] in moderate and severe ARDS, muscle relaxants, recruitment maneuvers, and venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO]) a low level of proof (GRADE 2 + or 2 −); seven (surveillance, tidal volume for non ARDS mechanically ventilated patients, tidal volume limitation in the presence of low plateau pressure, PEEP > 5 cmH2O, high PEEP in the absence of deleterious effect, pressure mode allowing spontaneous ventilation after the acute phase, and nitric oxide) corresponded to a level of proof that did not allow use of the GRADE classification and were expert opinions. Lastly, for three aspects of ARDS management (driving pressure, early spontaneous ventilation, and extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal), the experts concluded that no sound recommendation was possible given current knowledge. The recommendations and the therapeutic algorithm were approved by the experts with strong agreement.

          Related collections

          Most cited references113

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.

          In patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome, massive alveolar collapse and cyclic lung reopening and overdistention during mechanical ventilation may perpetuate alveolar injury. We determined whether a ventilatory strategy designed to minimize such lung injuries could reduce not only pulmonary complications but also mortality at 28 days in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. We randomly assigned 53 patients with early acute respiratory distress syndrome (including 28 described previously), all of whom were receiving identical hemodynamic and general support, to conventional or protective mechanical ventilation. Conventional ventilation was based on the strategy of maintaining the lowest positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for acceptable oxygenation, with a tidal volume of 12 ml per kilogram of body weight and normal arterial carbon dioxide levels (35 to 38 mm Hg). Protective ventilation involved end-expiratory pressures above the lower inflection point on the static pressure-volume curve, a tidal volume of less than 6 ml per kilogram, driving pressures of less than 20 cm of water above the PEEP value, permissive hypercapnia, and preferential use of pressure-limited ventilatory modes. After 28 days, 11 of 29 patients (38 percent) in the protective-ventilation group had died, as compared with 17 of 24 (71 percent) in the conventional-ventilation group (P<0.001). The rates of weaning from mechanical ventilation were 66 percent in the protective-ventilation group and 29 percent in the conventional-ventilation group (P=0.005): the rates of clinical barotrauma were 7 percent and 42 percent, respectively (P=0.02), despite the use of higher PEEP and mean airway pressures in the protective-ventilation group. The difference in survival to hospital discharge was not significant; 13 of 29 patients (45 percent) in the protective-ventilation group died in the hospital, as compared with 17 of 24 in the conventional-ventilation group (71 percent, P=0.37). As compared with conventional ventilation, the protective strategy was associated with improved survival at 28 days, a higher rate of weaning from mechanical ventilation, and a lower rate of barotrauma in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Protective ventilation was not associated with a higher rate of survival to hospital discharge.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Positive end-expiratory pressure setting in adults with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

            The need for lung protection is universally accepted, but the optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in patients with acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome remains debated. To compare the effect on outcome of a strategy for setting PEEP aimed at increasing alveolar recruitment while limiting hyperinflation to one aimed at minimizing alveolar distension in patients with ALI. A multicenter randomized controlled trial of 767 adults (mean [SD] age, 59.9 [15.4] years) with ALI conducted in 37 intensive care units in France from September 2002 to December 2005. Tidal volume was set at 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight in both strategies. Patients were randomly assigned to a moderate PEEP strategy (5-9 cm H(2)O) (minimal distension strategy; n = 382) or to a level of PEEP set to reach a plateau pressure of 28 to 30 cm H(2)O (increased recruitment strategy; n = 385). The primary end point was mortality at 28 days. Secondary end points were hospital mortality at 60 days, ventilator-free days, and organ failure-free days at 28 days. The 28-day mortality rate in the minimal distension group was 31.2% (n = 119) vs 27.8% (n = 107) in the increased recruitment group (relative risk, 1.12 [95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.40]; P = .31). The hospital mortality rate in the minimal distension group was 39.0% (n = 149) vs 35.4% (n = 136) in the increased recruitment group (relative risk, 1.10 [95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.32]; P = .30). The increased recruitment group compared with the minimal distension group had a higher median number of ventilator-free days (7 [interquartile range {IQR}, 0-19] vs 3 [IQR, 0-17]; P = .04) and organ failure-free days (6 [IQR, 0-18] vs 2 [IQR, 0-16]; P = .04). This strategy also was associated with higher compliance values, better oxygenation, less use of adjunctive therapies, and larger fluid requirements. A strategy for setting PEEP aimed at increasing alveolar recruitment while limiting hyperinflation did not significantly reduce mortality. However, it did improve lung function and reduced the duration of mechanical ventilation and the duration of organ failure. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00188058.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ventilation strategy using low tidal volumes, recruitment maneuvers, and high positive end-expiratory pressure for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

              Low-tidal-volume ventilation reduces mortality in critically ill patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Instituting additional strategies to open collapsed lung tissue may further reduce mortality. To compare an established low-tidal-volume ventilation strategy with an experimental strategy based on the original "open-lung approach," combining low tidal volume, lung recruitment maneuvers, and high positive-end-expiratory pressure. Randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation and blinded data analysis conducted between August 2000 and March 2006 in 30 intensive care units in Canada, Australia, and Saudi Arabia. Nine hundred eighty-three consecutive patients with acute lung injury and a ratio of arterial oxygen tension to inspired oxygen fraction not exceeding 250. The control strategy included target tidal volumes of 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight, plateau airway pressures not exceeding 30 cm H2O, and conventional levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (n = 508). The experimental strategy included target tidal volumes of 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight, plateau pressures not exceeding 40 cm H2O, recruitment maneuvers, and higher positive end-expiratory pressures (n = 475). All-cause hospital mortality. Eighty-five percent of the 983 study patients met criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome at enrollment. Tidal volumes remained similar in the 2 groups, and mean positive end-expiratory pressures were 14.6 (SD, 3.4) cm H2O in the experimental group vs 9.8 (SD, 2.7) cm H2O among controls during the first 72 hours (P < .001). All-cause hospital mortality rates were 36.4% and 40.4%, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-1.05; P = .19). Barotrauma rates were 11.2% and 9.1% (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.83-1.75; P = .33). The experimental group had lower rates of refractory hypoxemia (4.6% vs 10.2%; RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.34-0.86; P = .01), death with refractory hypoxemia (4.2% vs 8.9%; RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.34-0.93; P = .03), and previously defined eligible use of rescue therapies (5.1% vs 9.3%; RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-0.99; P = .045). For patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome, a multifaceted protocolized ventilation strategy designed to recruit and open the lung resulted in no significant difference in all-cause hospital mortality or barotrauma compared with an established low-tidal-volume protocolized ventilation strategy. This "open-lung" strategy did appear to improve secondary end points related to hypoxemia and use of rescue therapies. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00182195.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Laurent.PAPAZIAN@ap-hm.fr
                cecile.aubron@monash.edu
                BrochardL@smh.ca
                jean-daniel.chiche@cch.aphp.fr
                alain.combes@psl.aphp.fr
                didier.dreyfuss@aphp.fr
                JeanMarie.FOREL@ap-hm.fr
                claude.guerin@chu-lyon.fr
                s-jaber@chu-montpellier.fr
                armand.dessap@aphp.fr
                AlMercat@chu-angers.fr
                jcmb.richard@gmail.com
                damien.roux@aphp.fr
                antoine.vieillard-baron@aphp.fr
                henri.faure@ch-aulnay.fr
                Journal
                Ann Intensive Care
                Ann Intensive Care
                Annals of Intensive Care
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                2110-5820
                13 June 2019
                13 June 2019
                2019
                : 9
                : 69
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1773 6284, GRID grid.414244.3, Service de Médecine Intensive - Réanimation, , Hôpital Nord, ; Chemin des Bourrely, 13015 Marseille, France
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0472 3249, GRID grid.411766.3, Medical Intensive Care Unit, , Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Brest, ; site La Cavale Blanche, Bvd Tanguy Prigent, 29609 Brest Cedex, France
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2157 2938, GRID grid.17063.33, Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, , University of Toronto, ; Toronto, Canada
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2175 4109, GRID grid.50550.35, Service de Médecine Intensive - Réanimation, Hôpital Cochin, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Centre, , Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, ; 27 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2175 4109, GRID grid.50550.35, Service de Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié– Salpêtrière, , Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, ; 47, boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0273 556X, GRID grid.414205.6, Intensive Care Unit, , Louis Mourier Hospital, AP-HP, ; 178 Rue des Renouillers, 92700 Colombes, France
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0004 4685 6736, GRID grid.413306.3, Service de Réanimation Médicale, , Hôpital De La Croix Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, ; 103 Grande Rue de la Croix Rousse, 69004 Lyon, France
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9961 060X, GRID grid.157868.5, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care (DAR B), , Saint Eloi University Hospital, ; Montpellier, France
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2292 1474, GRID grid.412116.1, Service de Réanimation Médicale, , Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor, AP-HP, DHU A-TVB, ; 94010 Créteil, France
                [10 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0472 0283, GRID grid.411147.6, Medical Intensive Care Department, , Angers University Hospital, ; 4, rue Larrey, 49933 Angers Cedex, France
                [11 ]Emergency Department, General Hospital of Annecy, Annecy, France
                [12 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2175 4109, GRID grid.50550.35, Hospital Ambroise Paré, , Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, ; Boulogne, France
                [13 ]Service de Médecine Intensive - Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Robert Ballanger, 93602 Aulnay-sous-Bois, France
                Article
                540
                10.1186/s13613-019-0540-9
                6565761
                31197492
                5da71af2-02e4-46c2-a079-b982b498f30b
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 15 April 2019
                : 27 May 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100008800, Société de Réanimation de Langue Française;
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                Emergency medicine & Trauma

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content173

                Cited by301

                Most referenced authors2,752