9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Behavioral responses to predatory sounds predict sensitivity of cetaceans to anthropogenic noise within a soundscape of fear

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Acoustic signals travel efficiently in the marine environment, allowing soniferous predators and prey to eavesdrop on each other. Our results with four cetacean species indicate that they use acoustic information to assess predation risk and have evolved mechanisms to reduce predation risk by ceasing foraging. Species that more readily gave up foraging in response to predatory sounds of killer whales also decreased foraging more during 1- to 4-kHz sonar exposures, indicating that species exhibiting costly antipredator responses also have stronger behavioral reactions to anthropogenic noise. This advance in our understanding of the drivers of disturbance helps us to predict what species and habitats are likely to be most severely impacted by underwater noise pollution in oceans undergoing increasing anthropogenic activities.

          Abstract

          As human activities impact virtually every animal habitat on the planet, identifying species at-risk from disturbance is a priority. Cetaceans are an example taxon where responsiveness to anthropogenic noise can be severe but highly species and context specific, with source–receiver characteristics such as hearing sensitivity only partially explaining this variability. Here, we predicted that ecoevolutionary factors that increase species responsiveness to predation risk also increase responsiveness to anthropogenic noise. We found that reductions in intense-foraging time during exposure to 1- to 4-kHz naval sonar and predatory killer whale sounds were highly correlated ( r = 0.92) across four cetacean species. Northern bottlenose whales ceased foraging completely during killer whale and sonar exposures, followed by humpback, long-finned pilot, and sperm whales, which reduced intense foraging by 48 to 97%. Individual responses to sonar were partly predicted by species-level responses to killer whale playbacks, implying a similar level of perceived risk. The correlation cannot be solely explained by hearing sensitivity, indicating that species- and context-specific antipredator adaptations also shape cetacean responses to human-made noise. Species that are more responsive to predator presence are predicted to be more disturbance sensitive, implying a looming double whammy for Arctic cetaceans facing increased anthropogenic and predator activity with reduced ice cover.

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems.

          The management and conservation of the world's oceans require synthesis of spatial data on the distribution and intensity of human activities and the overlap of their impacts on marine ecosystems. We developed an ecosystem-specific, multiscale spatial model to synthesize 17 global data sets of anthropogenic drivers of ecological change for 20 marine ecosystems. Our analysis indicates that no area is unaffected by human influence and that a large fraction (41%) is strongly affected by multiple drivers. However, large areas of relatively little human impact remain, particularly near the poles. The analytical process and resulting maps provide flexible tools for regional and global efforts to allocate conservation resources; to implement ecosystem-based management; and to inform marine spatial planning, education, and basic research.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment.

              The amount of risk animals perceive in a given circumstance (i.e. their degree of 'fear') is a difficult motivational state to study. While many studies have used flight initiation distance as a proxy for fearfulness and examined the factors influencing the decision to flee, there is no general understanding of the relative importance of these factors. By identifying factors with large effect sizes, we can determine whether anti-predator strategies reduce fear, and we gain a unique perspective on the coevolution of predator and anti-predator behaviour. Based on an extensive review and formal meta-analysis, we found that predator traits that were associated with greater risk (speed, size, directness of approach), increased prey distance to refuge and experience with predators consistently amplified the perception of risk (in terms of flight initiation distance). While fish tolerated closer approach when in larger schools, other taxa had greater flight initiation distances when in larger groups. The presence of armoured and cryptic morphologies decreased perception of risk, but body temperature in lizards had no robust effect on flight initiation distance. We find that selection generally acts on prey to be sensitive to predator behaviour, as well as on prey to modify their behaviour and morphology.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                pnas
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                21 March 2022
                29 March 2022
                21 March 2022
                : 119
                : 13
                : e2114932119
                Affiliations
                [1] aSea Mammal Research Unit, University of St Andrews , St Andrews, Fife KY16 9QQ, United Kingdom;
                [2] bAcoustics & Sonar, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research , NL-2509 The Hague, The Netherlands;
                [3] cdepartmentSensor and Surveillance Systems, Norwegian Defence Research Establishment , 2007 Horten, Norway;
                [4] dCerema, University Gustave Eiffel, UMRAE , F-67210 Strasbourg, France
                Author notes
                1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: pm29@ 123456st-andrews.ac.uk .

                Edited by Gerardo Ceballos, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico; received August 12, 2021; accepted January 24, 2022

                Author contributions: P.J.O.M., S.I., and C.C. designed research; P.J.O.M., S.I., E.S., F.-P.A.L., P.H.K., and C.C. performed research; S.I. and E.S. analyzed data; P.J.O.M., F.-P.A.L., P.H.K., and C.C. acquired funding; and P.J.O.M., S.I., E.S., F.-P.A.L., P.H.K., and C.C. wrote the paper.

                2P.J.O.M. and S.I. contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8028-9673
                Article
                202114932
                10.1073/pnas.2114932119
                9060435
                35312354
                5eb380a9-60b1-49f2-8a59-ab9eaebe243d
                Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).

                History
                : 24 January 2022
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Funding
                Funded by: Office of Naval Research
                Award ID: N00014-15-1-2533
                Award Recipient : Patrick Miller Award Recipient : Saana Isojunno Award Recipient : Eilidh Siegal Award Recipient : Frans-Peter Lam Award Recipient : Petter H. Kvadsheim Award Recipient : Charlotte Cure
                Funded by: Netherland Ministry of Defence
                Award ID: na
                Award Recipient : Patrick Miller Award Recipient : Saana Isojunno Award Recipient : Eilidh Siegal Award Recipient : Frans-Peter Lam Award Recipient : Petter H. Kvadsheim Award Recipient : Charlotte Cure
                Funded by: Norwegian Ministry of Defence
                Award ID: na
                Award Recipient : Patrick Miller Award Recipient : Saana Isojunno Award Recipient : Eilidh Siegal Award Recipient : Frans-Peter Lam Award Recipient : Petter H. Kvadsheim Award Recipient : Charlotte Cure
                Funded by: French Ministry of Defence
                Award ID: na
                Award Recipient : Patrick Miller Award Recipient : Saana Isojunno Award Recipient : Eilidh Siegal Award Recipient : Frans-Peter Lam Award Recipient : Petter H. Kvadsheim Award Recipient : Charlotte Cure
                Funded by: MOD | Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl) 100010418
                Award ID: na
                Award Recipient : Patrick Miller Award Recipient : Saana Isojunno Award Recipient : Eilidh Siegal Award Recipient : Frans-Peter Lam Award Recipient : Petter H. Kvadsheim Award Recipient : Charlotte Cure
                Categories
                414
                Biological Sciences
                Ecology

                evolution,cetacea,disturbance,naval sonar,risk–disturbance hypothesis

                Comments

                Comment on this article