6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Increased resistance towards fatigability in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          In facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) fatigue is a major complaint. We aimed to investigate whether during isometric sustained elbow flexions, performance fatigability indexes differ in patients with FSHD with respect to healthy controls.

          Methods

          Seventeen patients with FSHD and seventeen healthy controls performed two isometric flexions of the dominant biceps brachii at 20% of their maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) for 2 min and then at 60% MVC until exhaustion. Muscle weakness was characterized as a percentage of predicted values. Maximal voluntary strength, endurance time and performance fatigability indices (mean frequency of the power spectrum (MNF), muscle fiber conduction velocity (CV) and fractal dimension (FD)), extracted from the surface electromyogram signal (sEMG) were compared between the two groups.

          Results

          In patients with FSHD, maximal voluntary strength was 68.7% of predicted value ( p < 0.01). Compared to healthy controls, FSHD patients showed reduced MVC ( p < 0.001; r = 0.62) and lower levels of performance fatigability, characterized by reduced rate of changes in MNF ( p < 0.01; r = 0.56), CV ( p < 0.05; 0.37) and FD ( p < 0.001; r = 0.51) and increased endurance time ( p < 0.001; r = 0.63), during the isometric contraction at 60% MVC.

          Conclusion

          A decreased reduction in the slopes of all the considered sEMG parameters during sustained isometric elbow flexions suggests that patients with FSHD experience lower levels of performance fatigability compared to healthy controls.

          Related collections

          Most cited references79

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation.

          The Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (American Psychological Association, 2001, American Psychological Association, 2010) calls for the reporting of effect sizes and their confidence intervals. Estimates of effect size are useful for determining the practical or theoretical importance of an effect, the relative contributions of factors, and the power of an analysis. We surveyed articles published in 2009 and 2010 in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, noting the statistical analyses reported and the associated reporting of effect size estimates. Effect sizes were reported for fewer than half of the analyses; no article reported a confidence interval for an effect size. The most often reported analysis was analysis of variance, and almost half of these reports were not accompanied by effect sizes. Partial η2 was the most commonly reported effect size estimate for analysis of variance. For t tests, 2/3 of the articles did not report an associated effect size estimate; Cohen's d was the most often reported. We provide a straightforward guide to understanding, selecting, calculating, and interpreting effect sizes for many types of data and to methods for calculating effect size confidence intervals and power analysis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dimensional assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome.

            The absence of laboratory tests and clear criteria to identify homogeneous (sub)groups in patients presenting with unexplained fatigue, and to assess clinical status and disability in these patients, calls for further assessment methods. In the present study, a multi-dimensional approach to the assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is evaluated. Two-hundred and ninety-eight patients with CFS completed a set of postal questionnaires that assessed the behavioural, emotional, social, and cognitive aspects of CFS. By means of statistical analyses nine relatively independent dimensions of CFS were identified along which CFS-assessment and CFS-research can be directed. These dimensions were named: psychological well-being, functional impairment in daily life, sleep disturbances, avoidance of physical activity, neuropsychological impairment, causal attributions related to the complaints, social functioning, self-efficacy expectations, and subjective experience of the personal situation. A description of the study sample on these dimensions is presented.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Fatigue and fatigability in neurologic illnesses: proposal for a unified taxonomy.

              Fatigue is commonly reported in many neurologic illnesses, including multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease, myasthenia gravis, traumatic brain injury, and stroke. Fatigue contributes substantially to decrements in quality of life and disability in these illnesses. Despite the clear impact of fatigue as a disabling symptom, our understanding of fatigue pathophysiology is limited and current treatment options rarely lead to meaningful improvements in fatigue. Progress continues to be hampered by issues related to terminology and assessment. In this article, we propose a unified taxonomy and a novel assessment approach to addressing distinct aspects of fatigue and fatigability in clinical and research settings. This taxonomy is based on our current knowledge of the pathophysiology and phenomenology of fatigue and fatigability. Application of our approach indicates that the assessment and reporting of fatigue can be clarified and improved by utilizing this taxonomy and creating measures to address distinct aspects of fatigue and fatigability. We review the strengths and weaknesses of several common measures of fatigue and suggest, based on our model, that many research questions may be better addressed by using multiple measures. We also provide examples of how to apply and validate the taxonomy and suggest directions for future research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                gdantona@unipv.it
                Journal
                Eur J Appl Physiol
                Eur J Appl Physiol
                European Journal of Applied Physiology
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                1439-6319
                1439-6327
                1 March 2021
                1 March 2021
                2021
                : 121
                : 6
                : 1617-1629
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.8982.b, ISNI 0000 0004 1762 5736, Criams-Sport Medicine Centre Voghera, , University of Pavia, ; Voghera, Italy
                [2 ]GRID grid.16058.3a, ISNI 0000000123252233, Rehabilitation Research Laboratory 2rLab, Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, , University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, ; Manno/Landquart, Switzerland
                [3 ]GRID grid.5395.a, ISNI 0000 0004 1757 3729, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, , University of Pisa, ; Pisa, Italy
                [4 ]GRID grid.7548.e, ISNI 0000000121697570, Department of Life Sciences, , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, ; Modena, Italy
                [5 ]Child Neuropsychiatry, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
                [6 ]GRID grid.16058.3a, ISNI 0000000123252233, Research Methodology Competence Centre, Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, , University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, ; Manno, Switzerland
                [7 ]GRID grid.8982.b, ISNI 0000 0004 1762 5736, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine and Sport Medicine Centre Voghera, , University of Pavia, ; via Foscolo, 13 – 27058 Voghera, Italy
                Author notes

                Communicated by Nicolas place.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4794-2540
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9159-9287
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8579-0686
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4645-8055
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6142-2384
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3797-1789
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9577-5567
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1632-6684
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0683-5565
                Article
                4650
                10.1007/s00421-021-04650-3
                8144151
                33646424
                67d53239-5172-4cf9-9b82-454cf3260d25
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 25 September 2020
                : 19 February 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004923, AFM-Téléthon;
                Award ID: 17191
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: #sport4therapy
                Funded by: Università degli Studi di Pavia
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021

                Anatomy & Physiology
                neuromuscular disease,dystrophy,electromyography,fatigability,biceps brachii
                Anatomy & Physiology
                neuromuscular disease, dystrophy, electromyography, fatigability, biceps brachii

                Comments

                Comment on this article