7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Personalised profiling to identify clinically relevant changes in tremor due to multiple sclerosis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          There is growing interest in sensor-based assessment of upper limb tremor in multiple sclerosis and other movement disorders. However, previously such assessments have not been found to offer any improvement over conventional clinical observation in identifying clinically relevant changes in an individual’s tremor symptoms, due to poor test-retest repeatability.

          Method

          We hypothesised that this barrier could be overcome by constructing a tremor change metric that is customised to each individual’s tremor characteristics, such that random variability can be distinguished from clinically relevant changes in symptoms. In a cohort of 24 people with tremor due to multiple sclerosis, the newly proposed metrics were compared against conventional clinical and sensor-based metrics. Each metric was evaluated based on Spearman rank correlation with two reference metrics extracted from the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale: a task-based measure of functional disability (FTMTRS B) and the subject’s self-assessment of the impact of tremor on their activities of daily living (FTMTRS C).

          Results

          Unlike the conventional sensor-based and clinical metrics, the newly proposed ’change in scale’ metrics presented statistically significant correlations with changes in self-assessed impact of tremor ( max R 2>0.5, p<0.05 after correction for false discovery rate control). They also outperformed all other metrics in terms of correlations with changes in task-based functional performance ( R 2=0.25 vs. R 2=0.15 for conventional clinical observation, both p<0.05).

          Conclusions

          The proposed metrics achieve an elusive goal of sensor-based tremor assessment: improving on conventional visual observation in terms of sensitivity to change. Further refinement and evaluation of the proposed techniques is required, but our core findings imply that the main barrier to translational impact for this application can be overcome. Sensor-based tremor assessments may improve personalised treatment selection and the efficiency of clinical trials for new treatments by enabling greater standardisation and sensitivity to clinically relevant changes in symptoms.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability of the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale in essential tremor.

            The purpose of this study was to evaluate interrater and intrarater reliability of the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (TRS) in essential tremor (ET). Proper treatment of ET is contingent upon correct assessment of the severity, loss of function, and disability related to tremor. Videotape recordings of 17 subjects with ET evaluated with the TRS were produced and sent to 59 raters. Once the raters returned the videotape and completed the score sheet, they were mailed a second tape with the same recordings presented in a different order. In the interrater reliability evaluation, modified Kappa statistics for seven tremor type composites ranged from 0.10 to 0.65 in the first videotape and 0.17 to 0.62 in the second videotape. Interrater reliabilities were greater for Part A items (magnitude of tremor in different body parts) than for Part B items (tremor in writing and drawings) of the TRS. The average Spearman correlation was 0.87, indicating very good consistency between the two videotapes, but correlations for Part A were somewhat better than for Part B. It is best when the same rater performs repeated measures of tremor on a patient, particularly when judging tremor in handwriting and drawings. Training of raters on use of the TRS would help standardize judgement.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinically deployable Kinesia technology for automated tremor assessment.

              The objective was to design, build, and assess Kinesia, a wireless system for automated assessment of Parkinson's disease (PD) tremor. The current standard in evaluating PD is the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), a qualitative ranking system typically completed during an office visit. Kinesia integrates accelerometers and gyroscopes in a compact patient-worn unit to capture kinematic movement disorder features. Objectively quantifying PD manifestations with increased time resolution should aid in evaluating efficacy of treatment protocols and improve patient management. In this study, PD subjects performed the tremor subset of the UPDRS motor section while wearing Kinesia. Quantitative kinematic features were processed and highly correlated to clinician scores for rest tremor (r(2) = 0.89), postural tremor (r(2) = 0.90), and kinetic tremor (r(2) = 0.69). The quantitative features were used to develop a mathematical model that predicted tremor severity scores for new data with low errors. Finally, PD subjects indicated high clinical acceptance.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                david.western@uwe.ac.uk
                simon.neild@bristol.ac.uk
                rosemary.jones@nbt.nhs.uk
                angela.davies-smith@nbt.nhs.uk
                Journal
                BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
                BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
                BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6947
                16 August 2019
                16 August 2019
                2019
                : 19
                : 162
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7603, GRID grid.5337.2, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bristol, ; University Walk, Bristol, BS8 1TR UK
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2034 5266, GRID grid.6518.a, Institute of Bio-Sensing Technology, University of the West of England, ; Coldharbour Lane, Bristol, BS16 1QY UK
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7603, GRID grid.5337.2, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Bristol, ; University Walk, Bristol, BS8 1TR UK
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0417 1173, GRID grid.416201.0, MS Research Unit, Bristol & Avon Multiple Sclerosis (BrAMS) Centre, Southmead Hospital, ; Southmead Road, Bristol, BS10 5NB UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4303-7423
                Article
                881
                10.1186/s12911-019-0881-1
                6697987
                31419976
                6a0351a5-3b19-41ca-af5f-f4c2a36577a8
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 26 February 2019
                : 29 July 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100009127, Invention for Innovation Programme;
                Award ID: II-AR-0410-12030
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000266, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council;
                Award ID: EP/P501326/1
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000266, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council;
                Award ID: EP/K005375/1
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Bioinformatics & Computational biology
                biomedical signal processing,movement analysis,multiple sclerosis,sensitivity and specificity,tremor

                Comments

                Comment on this article