18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessing the Relationship between the Baseline Value of a Continuous Variable and Subsequent Change Over Time

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Analyzing the relationship between the baseline value and subsequent change of a continuous variable is a frequent matter of inquiry in cohort studies. These analyses are surprisingly complex, particularly if only two waves of data are available. It is unclear for non-biostatisticians where the complexity of this analysis lies and which statistical method is adequate. With the help of simulated longitudinal data of body mass index in children, we review statistical methods for the analysis of the association between the baseline value and subsequent change, assuming linear growth with time. Key issues in such analyses are mathematical coupling, measurement error, variability of change between individuals, and regression to the mean. Ideally, it is better to rely on multiple repeated measurements at different times and a linear random effects model is a standard approach if more than two waves of data are available. If only two waves of data are available, our simulations show that Blomqvist’s method – which consists in adjusting for measurement error variance the estimated regression coefficient of observed change on baseline value – provides accurate estimates. The adequacy of the methods to assess the relationship between the baseline value and subsequent change depends on the number of data waves, the availability of information on measurement error, and the variability of change between individuals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

          In clinical measurement comparison of a new measurement technique with an established one is often needed to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old. Such investigations are often analysed inappropriately, notably by using correlation coefficients. The use of correlation is misleading. An alternative approach, based on graphical techniques and simple calculations, is described, together with the relation between this analysis and the assessment of repeatability.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Statistics notes: Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading.

              When comparing a new method of measurement with a standard method, one of the things we want to know is whether the difference between the measurements by the two methods is related to the magnitude of the measurement. A plot of the difference against the standard measurement is sometimes suggested, but this will always appear to show a relation between difference and magnitude when there is none. A plot of the difference against the average of the standard and new measurements is unlikely to mislead in this way. We show this theoretically and by a practical example.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Front Public Health
                Front Public Health
                Front. Public Health
                Frontiers in Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2565
                23 August 2013
                2013
                : 1
                : 29
                Affiliations
                [1] 1University Hospital Center, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (IUMSP), University of Lausanne , Lausanne, Switzerland
                [2] 2Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University , Montreal, QC, Canada
                [3] 3McGill University Health Center Research Institute , Montreal, QC, Canada
                [4] 4Public Health Institute of Quebec , Montreal, QC, Canada
                Author notes

                Edited by: ClarLynda Williams-DeVane, North Carolina Central University, USA

                Reviewed by: Luigino Dal Maso, Centro Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, Italy; Juan Carlos Vivar, NCCU, USA

                *Correspondence: Arnaud Chiolero, University Hospital Center, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (IUMSP), University of Lausanne, 10 route de la Corniche, 1010 Lausanne, Switzerland e-mail: arnaud.chiolero@ 123456chuv.ch

                This article was submitted to Epidemiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health.

                Article
                10.3389/fpubh.2013.00029
                3854983
                24350198
                723ba612-2a94-4ba3-99b2-07a9d8d135c2
                Copyright © 2013 Chiolero, Paradis, Rich and Hanley.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 28 May 2013
                : 06 August 2013
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Equations: 2, References: 40, Pages: 8, Words: 9730
                Categories
                Public Health
                Hypothesis and Theory

                baseline value,change,measurement error,regression to the mean,mathematical coupling

                Comments

                Comment on this article