50
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Appropriate 'housekeeping' genes for use in expression profiling the effects of environmental estrogens in fish

      research-article
      1 , , 1
      BMC Molecular Biology
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Attempts to develop a mechanistic understanding of the effects of environmental estrogens on fish are increasingly conducted at the level of gene expression. Appropriate application of real-time PCR in such studies requires the use of a stably expressed 'housekeeping' gene as an internal control to normalize for differences in the amount of starting template between samples.

          Results

          We sought to identify appropriate genes for use as internal controls in experimental treatments with estrogen by analyzing the expression of eight functionally distinct 'housekeeping' genes (18S ribosomal RNA [18S rRNA], ribosomal protein l8 [ rpl8], elongation factor 1 alpha [ ef1a], glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase [ g6pd], beta actin [ bactin], glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [ gapdh], hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 [ hprt1], and tata box binding protein [ tbp]) following exposure to the environmental estrogen, 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE 2), in the fathead minnow ( Pimephales promelas). Exposure to 10 ng/L EE 2 for 21 days down-regulated the expression of ef1a, g6pd, bactin and gapdh in the liver, and bactin and gapdh in the gonad. Some of these effects were gender-specific, with bactin in the liver and gapdh in the gonad down-regulated by EE 2 in males only. Furthermore, when ef1a, g6pd, bactin or gapdh were used for normalization, the hepatic expression of two genes of interest, vitellogenin ( vtg) and cytochrome P450 1A ( cyp1a) following exposure to EE 2 was overestimated.

          Conclusion

          Based on the data presented, we recommend 18S rRNA, rpl8, hprt1 and/or tbp, but not ef1a, g6pd, bactin and/or gapdh, as likely appropriate internal controls in real-time PCR studies of estrogens effects in fish. Our studies show that pre-validation of control genes considering the scope and nature of the experiments to be performed, including both gender and tissue type, is critical for accurate assessments of the effects of environmental estrogens on gene expression in fish.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Housekeeping genes as internal standards: use and limits.

          Quantitative studies are commonly realised in the biomedical research to compare RNA expression in different experimental or clinical conditions. These quantifications are performed through their comparison to the expression of the housekeeping gene transcripts like glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH), albumin, actins, tubulins, cyclophilin, hypoxantine phsophoribosyltransferase (HRPT), L32. 28S, and 18S rRNAs are also used as internal standards. In this paper, it is recalled that the commonly used internal standards can quantitatively vary in response to various factors. Possible variations are illustrated using three experimental examples. Preferred types of internal standards are then proposed for each of these samples and thereafter the general procedure concerning the choice of an internal standard and the way to manage its uses are discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Validating internal controls for quantitative plant gene expression studies

            Background Real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) has greatly improved the ease and sensitivity of quantitative gene expression studies. However, accurate measurement of gene expression with this method relies on the choice of a valid reference for data normalization. Studies rarely verify that gene expression levels for reference genes are adequately consistent among the samples used, nor compare alternative genes to assess which are most reliable for the experimental conditions analyzed. Results Using real-time RT-PCR to study the expression of 10 poplar (genus Populus) housekeeping genes, we demonstrate a simple method for determining the degree of stability of gene expression over a set of experimental conditions. Based on a traditional method for analyzing the stability of varieties in plant breeding, it defines measures of gene expression stability from analysis of variance (ANOVA) and linear regression. We found that the potential internal control genes differed widely in their expression stability over the different tissues, developmental stages and environmental conditions studied. Conclusion Our results support that quantitative comparisons of candidate reference genes are an important part of real-time RT-PCR studies that seek to precisely evaluate variation in gene expression. The method we demonstrated facilitates statistical and graphical evaluation of gene expression stability. Selection of the best reference gene for a given set of experimental conditions should enable detection of biologically significant changes in gene expression that are too small to be revealed by less precise methods, or when highly variable reference genes are unknowingly used in real-time RT-PCR experiments.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Normalization of gene expression measurements in tumor tissues: comparison of 13 endogenous control genes.

              For interpretation of quantitative gene expression measurements in clinical tumor samples, a normalizer is necessary to correct expression data for differences in cellular input, RNA quality, and RT efficiency between samples. In many studies, a single housekeeping gene is used for normalization. However, no unequivocal single reference gene (with proven invariable expression between cells) has been identified yet. As the best alternative, the mean expression of multiple housekeeping genes can be used for normalization. In this study, no attempt was made to determine the gold-standard gene for normalization, but to identify the best single housekeeping gene that could accurately replace the measurement of multiple genes. Expression patterns of 13 frequently used housekeeping genes were determined in 80 normal and tumor samples from colorectal, breast, prostate, skin, and bladder tissues with real-time quantitative RT-PCR. These genes included, large ribosomal protein, beta-actin, cyclophilin A, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, phosphoglycerokinase 1, beta-2-microglobin, beta-glucuronidase, hypoxanthine ribosyltransferase (HPRT), TATA-box-binding protein, transferrin receptor, porphobilinogen deaminase, ATP synthase 6, and 18S ribosomal RNA. Principal component analysis was used to analyze these expression patterns, independent of the level of expression. Our approach identified HPRT as the single best reference gene that could be used as an accurate and economic alternative for the measurement of multiple housekeeping genes. We recommend this gene for future studies to standardize gene expression measurements in cancer research and tumor diagnostics until a definite gold standard has been determined.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Mol Biol
                BMC Molecular Biology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2199
                2007
                8 February 2007
                : 8
                : 10
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Environmental and Molecular Fish Biology Group, School of Biosciences, Hatherly Laboratories, University of Exeter, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter, Devon, EX4 4PS, UK
                Article
                1471-2199-8-10
                10.1186/1471-2199-8-10
                1802086
                17288598
                7603a420-bee5-43e0-9326-491d412b528e
                Copyright © 2007 Filby and Tyler; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 8 November 2006
                : 8 February 2007
                Categories
                Research Article

                Molecular biology
                Molecular biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article