33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Exploring the function and effectiveness of knowledge brokers as facilitators of knowledge translation in health-related settings: a systematic review and thematic analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Knowledge brokers (KBs) work collaboratively with key stakeholders to facilitate the transfer and exchange of information in a given context. Currently, there is a perceived lack of evidence about the effectiveness of knowledge brokering and the factors that influence its success as a knowledge translation (KT) mechanism. Thus, the goal of this review was to systematically gather evidence regarding the nature of knowledge brokering in health-related settings and determine if KBs effectively contributed to KT in these settings.

          Methods

          A systematic review was conducted using a search strategy designed by a health research librarian. Eight electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC, Scopus, SocINDEX, and Health Business Elite) and relevant grey literature sources were searched using English language restrictions. Two reviewers independently screened the abstracts, reviewed full-text articles, extracted data, and performed quality assessments. Analysis included a confirmatory thematic approach. To be included, studies must have occurred in a health-related setting, reported on an actual application of knowledge brokering, and be available in English.

          Results

          In total, 7935 records were located. Following removal of duplicates, 6936 abstracts were screened and 240 full-text articles were reviewed. Ultimately, 29 articles, representing 22 unique studies, were included in the thematic analysis. Qualitative ( n = 18), quantitative ( n = 1), and mixed methods ( n = 6) designs were represented in addition to grey literature sources ( n = 4). Findings indicated that KBs performed a diverse range of tasks across multiple health-related settings; results supported the KB role as a ‘knowledge manager’, ‘linkage agent’, and ‘capacity builder’. Our systematic review explored outcome data from a subset of studies ( n = 8) for evidence of changes in knowledge, skills, and policies or practices related to knowledge brokering. Two studies met standards for acceptable methodological rigour; thus, findings were inconclusive regarding KB effectiveness.

          Conclusions

          As knowledge managers, linkage agents, and capacity builders, KBs performed many and varied tasks to transfer and exchange information across health-related stakeholders, settings, and sectors. How effectively they fulfilled their role in facilitating KT processes is unclear; further rigourous research is required to answer this question and discern the potential impact of KBs on education, practice, and policy.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0351-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The in-between world of knowledge brokering.

            J Lomas (2007)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies

              Context Significant resources and time are invested in the production of research knowledge. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of three knowledge translation and exchange strategies in the incorporation of research evidence into public health policies and programs. Methods This trial was conducted with a national sample of public health departments in Canada from 2004 to 2006. The three interventions, implemented over one year in 2005, included access to an online registry of research evidence; tailored messaging; and a knowledge broker. The primary outcome assessed the extent to which research evidence was used in a recent program decision, and the secondary outcome measured the change in the sum of evidence-informed healthy body weight promotion policies or programs being delivered at health departments. Mixed-effects models were used to test the hypotheses. Findings One hundred and eight of 141 (77%) health departments participated in this study. No significant effect of the intervention was observed for primary outcome (p < 0.45). However, for public health policies and programs (HPPs), a significant effect of the intervention was observed only for tailored, targeted messages (p < 0.01). The treatment effect was moderated by organizational research culture (e.g., value placed on research evidence in decision making). Conclusion The results of this study suggest that under certain conditions tailored, targeted messages are more effective than knowledge brokering and access to an online registry of research evidence. Greater emphasis on the identification of organizational factors is needed in order to implement strategies that best meet the needs of individual organizations. Trial Registration The trial registration number and title are as follows: ISRCTN35240937 -- Is a knowledge broker more effective than other strategies in promoting evidence-based physical activity and healthy body weight programming?
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                cbornba@gmail.com
                Kathy.Kornas@utoronto.ca
                lesleapeirson@gmail.com
                Laura.Rosella@utoronto.ca
                Journal
                Implement Sci
                Implement Sci
                Implementation Science : IS
                BioMed Central (London )
                1748-5908
                20 November 2015
                20 November 2015
                2015
                : 10
                : 162
                Affiliations
                [ ]Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, 6th Floor, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7 Canada
                [ ]Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, Western University, Elborn College, Room 2200, London, ON N6A 1H1 Canada
                [ ]Public Health Ontario, Santé publique Ontario, 480 University Avenue, Suite 300, Toronto, ON M5G 1V2 Canada
                [ ]McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Centre, School of Nursing, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8 Canada
                [ ]Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), G1 06, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5 Canada
                Article
                351
                10.1186/s13012-015-0351-9
                4653833
                26589972
                7fd1ea22-cb90-4704-9132-be622481489e
                © Bornbaum et al. 2015

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 30 April 2015
                : 11 November 2015
                Categories
                Systematic Review
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Medicine
                knowledge broker,knowledge translation,knowledge transfer,linkage agent,capacity builder,knowledge manager,evidence-based,health,evaluation,systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article