3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Long-Term Prognostic Value of Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance–Related Coronary Revascularization to Predict Death: A Large Registry With >200 000 Patient-Years of Follow-Up

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Although the benefit of coronary revascularization in patients with stable coronary disease is debated, data assessing the potential interest of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) to guide coronary revascularization are limited. We aimed to assess the long-term prognostic value of stress CMR-related coronary revascularization in consecutive patients from a large registry.

          Methods:

          Between 2008 and 2018, a retrospective cohort study with a median follow-up of 6.0 years (interquartile range, 5.0–8.0) included all consecutive patients referred for stress CMR. CMR-related coronary revascularization was defined by any coronary revascularization performed within 90 days after CMR. The primary outcome was all-cause death based on the National Death Registry.

          Results:

          Among the 31 762 consecutive patients (mean age 63.7±12.1 years and 65.7% males), 2679 (8.4%) died at 206 453 patient-years of follow-up. Inducible ischemia and late gadolinium enhancement by CMR were associated with death (both P <0.001). In multivariable Cox regression, inducible ischemia and late gadolinium enhancement were independent predictors of death (hazard ratio, 1.61 [99.5% CI, 1.41–1.84]; hazard ratio, 1.62 [99.5% CI, 1.41–1.86], respectively; P <0.001). In the overall population, CMR-related coronary revascularization was an independent predictor of greater survival (hazard ratio, 0.58 [99.5% CI, 0.46–0.74]; P <0.001). In 1680, 1:1 matched patients using a limited number of variables (840 revascularized, 840 nonrevascularized), CMR-related revascularization was associated with a lower incidence of death in patients with severe inducible ischemia (≥6 segments, P <0.001) but showed no benefit in patients with mild or moderate ischemia (<6 segments, P =0.109). Using multivariable analysis in the propensity-matched population, CMR-related revascularization remained an independent predictor of a lower incidence of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.66 [99.5% CI, 0.54–0.80], P <0.001).

          Conclusions:

          In this large observational series of consecutive patients, stress perfusion CMR had important incremental long-term prognostic value to predict death over traditional risk factors. CMR-related revascularization was associated with a lower incidence of death in patients with severe ischemia.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association

          Circulation, 139(10)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              SOME PRACTICAL GUIDANCE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging
                Circ: Cardiovascular Imaging
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                1941-9651
                1942-0080
                October 2021
                October 2021
                : 14
                : 10
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Hôpital Privé Jacques Cartier, Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Laboratory, Ramsay Santé, Massy, France (T.P., T.U., P.G., T.H., F.S., S.C., J.G.).
                [2 ]Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (T.P.).
                [3 ]Siemens Healthcare France, Saint-Denis, France (S.T.).
                [4 ]Independent Biostatistician, Pérouges, France (S.M.).
                Article
                10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.121.012789
                34612046
                872fc101-424d-454c-9954-4f4b3e3e340d
                © 2021
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content67

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors1,680