14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Building blocks for developing spatial skills: evidence from a large, representative U.S. sample.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There is evidence suggesting that children's play with spatial toys (e.g., puzzles and blocks) correlates with spatial development. Females play less with spatial toys than do males, which arguably accounts for males' spatial advantages; children with high socioeconomic status (SES) also show an advantage, though SES-related differences in spatial play have been less studied than gender-related differences. Using a large, nationally representative sample from the standardization study of the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Fourth Edition, and controlling for other cognitive abilities, we observed a specific relation between parent-reported frequency of spatial play and Block Design scores that was invariant across gender and SES. Reported spatial play was higher for boys than for girls, but controlling for spatial play did not eliminate boys' relative advantage on this subtest. SES groups did not differ in reported frequency of spatial play. Future research should consider quality as well as quantity of play, and should explore underlying mechanisms to evaluate causality.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables.

          In recent years, the magnitude, consistency, and stability across time of cognitive sex differences have been questioned. The present study examined these issues in the context of spatial abilities. A meta-analysis of 286 effect sizes from a variety of spatial ability measures was conducted. Effect sizes were partitioned by the specific test used and by a number of variables related to the experimental procedure in order to achieve homogeneity. Results showed that sex differences are significant in several tests but that some intertest differences exist. Partial support was found for the notion that the magnitude of sex differences has decreased in recent years. Finally, it was found that the age of emergence of sex differences depends on the test used. Results are discussed with regard to their implications for the study of sex differences in spatial abilities.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The mental representation of parity and number magnitude.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Psychol Sci
                Psychological science
                1467-9280
                0956-7976
                Mar 2015
                : 26
                : 3
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Rhodes College jiroutj@rhodes.edu jjiroutcmu@gmail.com.
                [2 ] Temple University.
                Article
                0956797614563338
                10.1177/0956797614563338
                25626442
                9054268c-fd4a-41d9-9521-c665e9a5d21e
                © The Author(s) 2015.
                History

                cognitive development,learning,sex differences,socioeconomic status,spatial ability

                Comments

                Comment on this article