9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The endoscopic predictors of Helicobacter pylori status: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          The endoscopic findings associated with Helicobacter pylori–naïve status, current infection or past infection are an area of ongoing interest. Previous studies have investigated parameters with a potential diagnostic value. The aim of this study was to perform meta-analysis of the available literature to validate the diagnostic accuracy of mucosal features proposed in the Kyoto classification.

          Data sources:

          The databases of MEDLINE and Embase, clinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant studies from October 1999 to October 2019.

          Methods:

          A bivariate random effects model was used to produce pooled diagnostic accuracy calculations for each of the studied endoscopic findings. Diagnostic odds ratios and sensitivity and specificity characteristics were calculated to identify significant predictors of H pylori status.

          Results:

          Meta-analysis included 4380 patients in 15 studies. The most significant predictor of an H pylori-naïve status was a regular arrangement of collecting venules (diagnostic odds ratio 55.0, sensitivity 78.3%, specificity 93.8%). Predictors of active H pylori infection were mucosal oedema (18.1, 63.7%, 91.1%) and diffuse redness (14.4, 66.5%, 89.0%). Map-like redness had high specificity for previous H pylori eradication (99.0%), but poor specificity (13.0%).

          Conclusion:

          The regular arrangement of collecting venules, mucosal oedema, diffuse redness and map-like redness are important endoscopic findings for determining H pylori status. This meta-analysis provides a tentative basis for developing future endoscopic classification systems.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.

          In 2003, the QUADAS tool for systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies was developed. Experience, anecdotal reports, and feedback suggested areas for improvement; therefore, QUADAS-2 was developed. This tool comprises 4 domains: patient selection, index test, reference standard, and flow and timing. Each domain is assessed in terms of risk of bias, and the first 3 domains are also assessed in terms of concerns regarding applicability. Signalling questions are included to help judge risk of bias. The QUADAS-2 tool is applied in 4 phases: summarize the review question, tailor the tool and produce review-specific guidance, construct a flow diagram for the primary study, and judge bias and applicability. This tool will allow for more transparent rating of bias and applicability of primary diagnostic accuracy studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Management of Helicobacter pylori infection-the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Report.

              Important progress has been made in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection and in this fifth edition of the Maastricht Consensus Report, key aspects related to the clinical role of H. pylori were re-evaluated in 2015. In the Maastricht V/Florence Consensus Conference, 43 experts from 24 countries examined new data related to H. pylori in five subdivided workshops: (1) Indications/Associations, (2) Diagnosis, (3) Treatment, (4) Prevention/Public Health, (5) H. pylori and the Gastric Microbiota. The results of the individual workshops were presented to a final consensus voting that included all participants. Recommendations are provided on the basis of the best available evidence and relevance to the management of H. pylori infection in the various clinical scenarios.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc
                Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc
                CMG
                spcmg
                Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                2631-7745
                23 October 2020
                Jan-Dec 2020
                : 13
                : 2631774520950840
                Affiliations
                [1-2631774520950840]Imperial College London, London, UK
                [2-2631774520950840]Imperial College London, London, UK
                [3-2631774520950840]Imperial College London, London, UK
                [4-2631774520950840]Imperial College London, London W2 1NY, UK
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3043-0012
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1668-0672
                Article
                10.1177_2631774520950840
                10.1177/2631774520950840
                7586493
                33150333
                93d729cf-97cb-469f-bb58-e8054bfc58dc
                © The Author(s), 2020

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 7 February 2020
                : 8 July 2020
                Categories
                Meta-Analysis
                Custom metadata
                January-December 2020
                ts1

                gastritis,helicobacter pylori,image enhancement,lesion recognition,optical diagnosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article