3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Occupational Balance Questionnaire: An Instrument for Occupation-Based Research

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Occupational balance (OB) may be a major determinant of health outcomes due to its role in bringing a sense of purpose in the occupations that are personally experienced as a process of getting health and wellness. The Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ) is a reliable instrument for measuring OB, although it has not been adapted and validated in Spain so far; therefore, this study had a double aim: (1) to translate and cross-culturally adapt the original OBQ version into Spanish (OBQ-E); (2) to analyze the psychometric properties for its use in the Spanish population. Standard procedures were used for the cross-adaptation process and pilot testing was carried out using three different samples to extend the applicability of the OBQ-E. Validation measures of the final version of the OBQ-E were conducted in a sample of 219 participants. The OBQ-E showed that items and instructions were culturally appropriate and written clearly. Psychometric testing showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.87; Guttman split-half coefficient = 0.85), good test–retest reliability (r s (Spearman rho) = 0.73), and acceptable convergent validity (overall status, r s = 0.37; Related Quality of Life, r s = 0.42; Satisfaction with Life Scale, r s = 0.54). The findings suggest that the OBQ-E may be a suitable instrument for assessing OB in the Spanish population; hence, it is a promising tool for epidemiological research that will significantly contribute to the understanding of OB as a health-related factor. Nevertheless, further investigation is also warranted to explore the potentiality of this instrument for clinical purposes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Satisfaction With Life Scale.

          This article reports the development and validation of a scale to measure global life satisfaction, the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS). Among the various components of subjective well-being, the SWLS is narrowly focused to assess global life satisfaction and does not tap related constructs such as positive affect or loneliness. The SWLS is shown to have favorable psychometric properties, including high internal consistency and high temporal reliability. Scores on the SWLS correlate moderately to highly with other measures of subjective well-being, and correlate predictably with specific personality characteristics. It is noted that the SWLS is Suited for use with different age groups, and other potential uses of the scale are discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

              Recently, an increasing number of systematic reviews have been published in which the measurement properties of health status questionnaires are compared. For a meaningful comparison, quality criteria for measurement properties are needed. Our aim was to develop quality criteria for design, methods, and outcomes of studies on the development and evaluation of health status questionnaires. Quality criteria for content validity, internal consistency, criterion validity, construct validity, reproducibility, longitudinal validity, responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, and interpretability were derived from existing guidelines and consensus within our research group. For each measurement property a criterion was defined for a positive, negative, or indeterminate rating, depending on the design, methods, and outcomes of the validation study. Our criteria make a substantial contribution toward defining explicit quality criteria for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Our criteria can be used in systematic reviews of health status questionnaires, to detect shortcomings and gaps in knowledge of measurement properties, and to design validation studies. The future challenge will be to refine and complete the criteria and to reach broad consensus, especially on quality criteria for good measurement properties.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                14 July 2021
                July 2021
                : 18
                : 14
                : 7506
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pathology and Surgery, Miguel Hernández University, 03550 Alicante, Spain; pperal@ 123456umh.es (P.P.-G.); eabad@ 123456umh.es (E.A.-N.)
                [2 ]Grupo de Investigación en Terapia Ocupacional (InTeO), Miguel Hernández University, 03550 Alicante, Spain
                [3 ]Department of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernández University, 03550 Alicante, Spain; slroig@ 123456umh.es (S.L.-R.); mapastor@ 123456umh.es (M.Á.P.-M.)
                [4 ]Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, 22363 Lund, Sweden; carita.hakansson@ 123456med.lu.se
                [5 ]Department of Rehabilitation, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, 55111 Jönköping, Sweden; petra.wagman@ 123456ju.se
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: dvalera@ 123456umh.es ; Tel.: +34-965-233-705
                [†]

                These authors share first authorship.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0390-0894
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6388-127X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3660-3079
                Article
                ijerph-18-07506
                10.3390/ijerph18147506
                8307131
                34299957
                98c750f2-0036-4562-b815-71487229113d
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 18 June 2021
                : 13 July 2021
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                occupational balance,questionnaire,adaptation,validation,psychometric testing
                Public health
                occupational balance, questionnaire, adaptation, validation, psychometric testing

                Comments

                Comment on this article