Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mapping national information and communication technology (ICT) infrastructure to the requirements of potential digital health interventions in low- and middle-income countries

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Digital health can support health care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) by overcoming problems of distance, poor infrastructure and the need to provide community practitioners with specialist support. We used five RESPIRE countries as exemplars (Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan) to identify the digital health solutions that are valuable in their local setting, worked together with local clinicians and researchers to explore digital health policy, electricity/ICT infrastructure, and socio-cultural factors influencing users’ ability to access, adopt and utilise digital health.

          Methods

          We adopted the Joanna Briggs Institute’s scoping review protocol and followed the Cochrane Rapid Review method to accelerate the review process, using the Implementation and Operation of Mobile Health projects framework and The Extended Technology Acceptance Model of Mobile Telephony to categorise the results. We conducted the review in four stages: (1) establishing value, (2) identifying digital health policy, (3) searching for evidence of infrastructure, design, and end-user adoption, (4) local input to interpret relevance and adoption factors. We used open-source national/international statistics such as the World Health Organization, International Telecommunication Union, Groupe Speciale Mobile, and local news/articles/government statistics to scope the current status, and systematically searched five databases for locally relevant exemplars.

          Results

          We found 118 studies (2015-2021) and 114 supplementary online news articles and national statistics. Digital health policy was available in all countries, but scarce skilled labour, lack of legislation/interoperability support, and interrupted electricity and internet services were limitations. Older patients, women and those living in rural areas were least likely to have access to ICT infrastructure. Renewable energy has potential in enabling digital health care. Low usage mobile data and voice service packages are relatively affordable options for mHealth in the five countries.

          Conclusions

          Effective implementation of digital health technologies requires a supportive policy, stable electricity infrastructures, affordable mobile internet service, and good understanding of the socio-economic context in order to tailor the intervention such that it functional, accessible, feasible, user-friendly and trusted by the target users. We suggest a checklist of contextual factors that developers of digital health initiatives in LMICs should consider at an early stage in the development process.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews

              Objective To develop methods guidance to support the conduct of rapid reviews (RRs) produced within Cochrane and beyond, in response to requests for timely evidence syntheses for decision-making purposes including urgent health issues of high priority. Study Design Interim recommendations were informed by a scoping review of the underlying evidence, primary methods studies conducted, and a survey sent to 119 representatives from 20 Cochrane entities, who were asked to rate and rank RR methods across stages of review conduct. Discussions among those with expertise in RR methods further informed the list of recommendations with accompanying rationales provided. Results Based on survey results from 63 respondents (53% response rate), 26 RR methods recommendations are presented for which there was a high or moderate level of agreement or scored highest in the absence of such agreement. Where possible, how recommendations align with Cochrane methods guidance for SRs is highlighted. Conclusion The Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers new, interim guidance to support the conduct of RRs. Because best practice is limited by the lack of currently available evidence for some RR methods shortcuts taken, this guidance will need to be updated as additional abbreviated methods are evaluated.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Glob Health
                J Glob Health
                JGH
                Journal of Global Health
                International Society of Global Health
                2047-2978
                2047-2986
                29 December 2022
                2022
                : 12
                : 04094
                Affiliations
                [1 ]NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Respiratory Health (RESPIRE), Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, UK
                [2 ]Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
                [3 ]Riphah Institute of Healthcare Improvement & Safety and Secretary, Islamabad, Pakistan
                [4 ]Centre for Technology Alternatives for Rural Areas (CTARA), Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India
                [5 ]Bangladesh Primary Care Respiratory Society (BPCRS), Khulna, Bangladesh
                [6 ]Clinical Research Centre, Sibu Hospital, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
                [7 ]Medinova Medical Services Ltd, Dhaka, Bangladesh
                [8 ]Neoventive Solutions, Islamabad, Pakistan
                [9 ]Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India
                [10 ]Departmentof Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
                [11 ]Vadu Rural Health Program, King Edward Memorial Hospital Research Centre Pune, India
                [12 ]Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Putra Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
                [13 ]MAHAN Trust, Mahatma Gandhi Tribal Hospital, Maharashtra, India
                [14 ]Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India
                [15 ]Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College Hospital, Sylhet, Bangladesh
                Author notes
                Correspondence to:
Hilary Pinnock
Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh
Doorway 3, Medical School, Teviot Place
Edinburgh
United Kingdom
Tel: 0131 650 8102
Fax: 0131 650 9119
 hilary.pinnock@ 123456ed.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6375-653X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1545-7110
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5521-4220
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6979-0686
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2792-9237
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7471-8678
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6640-3257
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0752-2736
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7439-2105
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5976-8386
                Article
                jogh-12-04094
                10.7189/jogh.12.04094
                9804211
                36579436
                a04e1872-8dfd-4097-90c5-12ce6e435a3b
                Copyright © 2022 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved.

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 5, Equations: 0, References: 103, Pages: 18
                Categories
                Articles

                Public health
                Public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article