199
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      European Surveillance for West Nile Virus in Mosquito Populations

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A wide range of arthropod-borne viruses threaten both human and animal health either through their presence in Europe or through risk of introduction. Prominent among these is West Nile virus (WNV), primarily an avian virus, which has caused multiple outbreaks associated with human and equine mortality. Endemic outbreaks of West Nile fever have been reported in Italy, Greece, France, Romania, Hungary, Russia and Spain, with further spread expected. Most outbreaks in Western Europe have been due to infection with WNV Lineage 1. In Eastern Europe WNV Lineage 2 has been responsible for human and bird mortality, particularly in Greece, which has experienced extensive outbreaks over three consecutive years. Italy has experienced co-circulation with both virus lineages. The ability to manage this threat in a cost-effective way is dependent on early detection. Targeted surveillance for pathogens within mosquito populations offers the ability to detect viruses prior to their emergence in livestock, equine species or human populations. In addition, it can establish a baseline of mosquito-borne virus activity and allow monitoring of change to this over time. Early detection offers the opportunity to raise disease awareness, initiate vector control and preventative vaccination, now available for horses, and encourage personal protection against mosquito bites. This would have major benefits through financial savings and reduction in equid morbidity/mortality. However, effective surveillance that predicts virus outbreaks is challenged by a range of factors including limited resources, variation in mosquito capture rates (too few or too many), difficulties in mosquito identification, often reliant on specialist entomologists, and the sensitive, rapid detection of viruses in mosquito pools. Surveillance for WNV and other arboviruses within mosquito populations varies between European countries in the extent and focus of the surveillance. This study reviews the current status of WNV in mosquito populations across Europe and how this is informing our understanding of virus epidemiology. Key findings such as detection of virus, presence of vector species and invasive mosquito species are summarized, and some of the difficulties encountered when applying a cost-effective surveillance programme are highlighted.

          Related collections

          Most cited references106

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Impact of daily temperature fluctuations on dengue virus transmission by Aedes aegypti.

          Most studies on the ability of insect populations to transmit pathogens consider only constant temperatures and do not account for realistic daily temperature fluctuations that can impact vector-pathogen interactions. Here, we show that diurnal temperature range (DTR) affects two important parameters underlying dengue virus (DENV) transmission by Aedes aegypti. In two independent experiments using different DENV serotypes, mosquitoes were less susceptible to virus infection and died faster under larger DTR around the same mean temperature. Large DTR (20 °C) decreased the probability of midgut infection, but not duration of the virus extrinsic incubation period (EIP), compared with moderate DTR (10 °C) or constant temperature. A thermodynamic model predicted that at mean temperatures 18 °C, larger DTR reduces DENV transmission. The negative impact of DTR on Ae. aegypti survival indicates that large temperature fluctuations will reduce the probability of vector survival through EIP and expectation of infectious life. Seasonal variation in the amplitude of daily temperature fluctuations helps to explain seasonal forcing of DENV transmission at locations where average temperature does not vary seasonally and mosquito abundance is not associated with dengue incidence. Mosquitoes lived longer and were more likely to become infected under moderate temperature fluctuations, which is typical of the high DENV transmission season than under large temperature fluctuations, which is typical of the low DENV transmission season. Our findings reveal the importance of considering short-term temperature variations when studying DENV transmission dynamics.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            West Nile fever--a reemerging mosquito-borne viral disease in Europe.

            West Nile virus causes sporadic cases and outbreaks of human and equine disease in Europe (western Mediterranean and southern Russia in 1962-64, Belarus and Ukraine in the 1970s and 1980s, Romania in 1996-97, Czechland in 1997, and Italy in 1998). Environmental factors, including human activities, that enhance population densities of vector mosquitoes (heavy rains followed by floods, irrigation, higher than usual temperature, or formation of ecologic niches that enable mass breeding of mosquitoes) could increase the incidence of West Nile fever.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Globalization, land use, and the invasion of West Nile virus.

              Many invasive species that have been spread through the globalization of trade and travel are pathogens. A paradigmatic case is the introduction of West Nile virus (WNV) into North America in 1999. A decade of research on the ecology and evolution of WNV includes three findings that provide insight into the outcome of future pathogen introductions. First, WNV transmission in North America is highest in urbanized and agricultural habitats, in part because the hosts and vectors of WNV are abundant in human-modified areas. Second, after its introduction, the virus quickly adapted to infect local mosquito vectors more efficiently than the originally introduced strain. Third, highly focused feeding patterns of the mosquito vectors of WNV result in unexpected host species being important for transmission. This research provides a framework for predicting and preventing the emergence of foreign vector-borne pathogens.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                11 October 2013
                October 2013
                : 10
                : 10
                : 4869-4895
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Spiez Laboratory, Federal Office for Civil Protection, Austrasse, Spiez 3700, Switzerland; E-Mails: oliver.engler@ 123456babs.admin.ch (O.E.); jasmine.portmann@ 123456babs.admin.ch (J.P.)
                [2 ]Zooprofilactic Institute Abruzzo and Molise “G. Caporale”, Campo Boario, Teramo 64100, Italy; E-Mails: g.savini@ 123456izs.it (G.S.); m.goffredo@ 123456izs.it (M.G.); v.federici@ 123456izs.it (V.F.)
                [3 ]Department of Microbiology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece; E-Mail: annap@ 123456med.auth.gr
                [4 ]Department of Wetland Ecology, Estación Biológica de Doñana, CSIC, Avda. Américo Vespucio s/n, Sevilla 41092, Spain; E-Mail: jordi@ 123456ebd.csic.es
                [5 ]Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Greifswald—Insel Riems, Südufer 17493, Germany; E-Mails: martin.groschup@ 123456fli.bund.de (M.H.G.); helge.kampen@ 123456fli.bund.de (H.K.)
                [6 ]Public Health England, Medical Entomology group, MRA, Emergency Response Department, Porton Down, Salisbury SP4 0JG, UK; E-Mails: jolyon.medlock@ 123456phe.gov.uk (J.M.); alex.vaux@ 123456phe.gov.uk (A.V.)
                [7 ]The Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright GU24 0NF, UK; E-Mail: anthony.wilson@ 123456pirbright.ac.uk
                [8 ]Institute of Land Use Systems, Leibnitz Centre for Agricultural Lanscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Strasse 84, Müncheberg 15374, Germany; E-Mail: doreen.werner@ 123456zalf.de
                [9 ]German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Hamburg-Luebeck-Borstel, Hamburg, Germany and German Mosquito Control Association (KABS), Waldsee and Bernhard-Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg D-20359, Germany; E-Mail: jonassi@ 123456gmx.de
                [10 ]Zooprofilactic Institute Venezie, Viale dell’ Università, 10, Padua, 35020 Legnaro, Italy; E-Mail: gcapelli@ 123456izsvenezie.it
                [11 ]Institute of Microbiology, Laboratory of Applied Microbiology, Via Mirasole 22a, Bellinzona CH-6500, Switzerland; E-Mail: mauro.tonolla@ 123456unige.ch
                [12 ]Mosquito Working Group, via al Castello, Canobbio CH-6952, Switzerland; E-Mails: fbm@ 123456bluewin.ch (N.P.); eleonora.flacio@ 123456ti.ch (E.F.); anyarossip@ 123456hotmail.com (A.R.-P.)
                [13 ]EcoDevelopment SA, Thermi 57001, Greece; E-Mail: info@ 123456ecodev.gr
                [14 ]Servicio de Control de Mosquitos, Diputación Provincial de Huelva, Huelva E-21003, Spain; E-Mail: sruiz@ 123456diphuelva.org
                [15 ]CNM-Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid 28220, Spain; E-Mail: a.vazquez@ 123456isciii.es
                [16 ]Zooprofilactic Institute Lombardy and Emilia Romagna “B. Ubertini”, Brescia 25124, Italy; E-Mails: mattia.calzolari@ 123456izsler.it (M.C.); paolo.bonilauri@ 123456izsler.it (P.B.); michele.dottori@ 123456izsler.it (M.D.)
                [17 ]Institute of Parasitology, National Centre for Vector Entomology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstr 266a, Zurich 8057, Switzerland; E-Mails: francis.schaffner@ 123456uzh.ch (F.S.); alexander.mathis@ 123456uzh.ch (A.M.)
                [18 ]Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Woodham Lane, Surrey KT15, 3NB, UK
                Author notes
                [* ] Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: Nick.Johnson@ 123456ahvla.gsi.gov.uk ; Tel.: +44-(0)1932-357-937; Fax: +44-(0)1932-357-239.
                Article
                ijerph-10-04869
                10.3390/ijerph10104869
                3823308
                24157510
                a093df05-9aa8-4c77-bc54-5fe5eb3bdc0e
                © 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

                This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

                History
                : 15 August 2013
                : 20 September 2013
                : 24 September 2013
                Categories
                Review

                Public health
                west nile virus,mosquito,surveillance,vector,invasive species
                Public health
                west nile virus, mosquito, surveillance, vector, invasive species

                Comments

                Comment on this article