7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Quantification of Hsp90 availability reveals differential coupling to the heat shock response

      research-article
      ,
      The Journal of Cell Biology
      Rockefeller University Press

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Alford and Brandman quantify the ability of the Hsp90 chaperone system to fold its client proteins and describe how loss of this functionality affects the heat shock response. They find that the heat shock response responds to diverse defects in protein quality by monitoring the state of multiple chaperone systems independently.

          Abstract

          The heat shock response (HSR) is a protective gene expression program that is activated by conditions that cause proteotoxic stress. While it has been suggested that the availability of free chaperones regulates the HSR, chaperone availability and the HSR have never been precisely quantified in tandem under stress conditions. Thus, how the availability of chaperones changes in stress conditions and the extent to which these changes drive the HSR are unknown. In this study, we quantified Hsp90 chaperone availability and the HSR under multiple stressors. We show that Hsp90-dependent and -independent pathways both regulate the HSR, and the contribution of each pathway varies greatly depending on the stressor. Moreover, stressors that regulate the HSR independently of Hsp90 availability do so through the Hsp70 chaperone. Thus, the HSR responds to diverse defects in protein quality by monitoring the state of multiple chaperone systems independently.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Regulation of HSF1 function in the heat stress response: implications in aging and disease.

          To dampen proteotoxic stresses and maintain protein homeostasis, organisms possess a stress-responsive molecular machinery that detects and neutralizes protein damage. A prominent feature of stressed cells is the increased synthesis of heat shock proteins (Hsps) that aid in the refolding of misfolded peptides and restrain protein aggregation. Transcriptional activation of the heat shock response is orchestrated by heat shock factor 1 (HSF1), which rapidly translocates to hsp genes and induces their expression. Although the role of HSF1 in protecting cells and organisms against severe stress insults is well established, many aspects of how HSF1 senses qualitatively and quantitatively different forms of stresses have remained poorly understood. Moreover, recent discoveries that HSF1 controls life span have prompted new ways of thinking about an old transcription factor. Here, we review the established role of HSF1 in counteracting cell stress and prospect the role of HSF1 as a regulator of disease states and aging.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The response to heat shock and oxidative stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

            A common need for microbial cells is the ability to respond to potentially toxic environmental insults. Here we review the progress in understanding the response of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to two important environmental stresses: heat shock and oxidative stress. Both of these stresses are fundamental challenges that microbes of all types will experience. The study of these environmental stress responses in S. cerevisiae has illuminated many of the features now viewed as central to our understanding of eukaryotic cell biology. Transcriptional activation plays an important role in driving the multifaceted reaction to elevated temperature and levels of reactive oxygen species. Advances provided by the development of whole genome analyses have led to an appreciation of the global reorganization of gene expression and its integration between different stress regimens. While the precise nature of the signal eliciting the heat shock response remains elusive, recent progress in the understanding of induction of the oxidative stress response is summarized here. Although these stress conditions represent ancient challenges to S. cerevisiae and other microbes, much remains to be learned about the mechanisms dedicated to dealing with these environmental parameters.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Stress-inducible regulation of heat shock factor 1 by the deacetylase SIRT1.

              Heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) is essential for protecting cells from protein-damaging stress associated with misfolded proteins and regulates the insulin-signaling pathway and aging. Here, we show that human HSF1 is inducibly acetylated at a critical residue that negatively regulates DNA binding activity. Activation of the deacetylase and longevity factor SIRT1 prolonged HSF1 binding to the heat shock promoter Hsp70 by maintaining HSF1 in a deacetylated, DNA-binding competent state. Conversely, down-regulation of SIRT1 accelerated the attenuation of the heat shock response (HSR) and release of HSF1 from its cognate promoter elements. These results provide a mechanistic basis for the requirement of HSF1 in the regulation of life span and establish a role for SIRT1 in protein homeostasis and the HSR.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Cell Biol
                J. Cell Biol
                jcb
                jcb
                The Journal of Cell Biology
                Rockefeller University Press
                0021-9525
                1540-8140
                05 November 2018
                05 November 2018
                : 217
                : 11
                : 3809-3816
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Onn Brandman: onn@ 123456stanford.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2084-154X
                Article
                201803127
                10.1083/jcb.201803127
                6219726
                30131327
                a0ce9aa6-b9c4-465c-bc91-bd6eb276809c
                © 2018 Alford and Brandman

                This article is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 21 March 2018
                : 22 July 2018
                : 10 August 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/100000002;
                Funded by: Stanford University, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/100005492;
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/100000002;
                Award ID: 1R01GM115968-01
                Funded by: National Institute of General Medical Sciences, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/100000057;
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health, DOI https://doi.org/10.13039/100000002;
                Award ID: T32GM007276
                Categories
                Research Articles
                Report
                47
                23
                35

                Cell biology
                Cell biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article