24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Conservation physiology of marine fishes: state of the art and prospects for policy

      review-article
      1 , * , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 8 , 14 , 13 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 19 , 17 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25
      Conservation Physiology
      Oxford University Press
      Biomarkers, ecological models, fisheries, Fry paradigm, individual variation, telemetry

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The state of the art of research on the environmental physiology of marine fishes is reviewed from the perspective of how it can contribute to conservation of biodiversity and fishery resources. A major constraint to application of physiological knowledge for conservation of marine fishes is the limited knowledge base; international collaboration is needed to study the environmental physiology of a wider range of species. Multifactorial field and laboratory studies on biomarkers hold promise to relate ecophysiology directly to habitat quality and population status. The ‘Fry paradigm’ could have broad applications for conservation physiology research if it provides a universal mechanism to link physiological function with ecological performance and population dynamics of fishes, through effects of abiotic conditions on aerobic metabolic scope. The available data indicate, however, that the paradigm is not universal, so further research is required on a wide diversity of species. Fish physiologists should interact closely with researchers developing ecological models, in order to investigate how integrating physiological information improves confidence in projecting effects of global change; for example, with mechanistic models that define habitat suitability based upon potential for aerobic scope or outputs of a dynamic energy budget. One major challenge to upscaling from physiology of individuals to the level of species and communities is incorporating intraspecific variation, which could be a crucial component of species’ resilience to global change. Understanding what fishes do in the wild is also a challenge, but techniques of biotelemetry and biologging are providing novel information towards effective conservation. Overall, fish physiologists must strive to render research outputs more applicable to management and decision-making. There are various potential avenues for information flow, in the shorter term directly through biomarker studies and in the longer term by collaborating with modellers and fishery biologists.

          Related collections

          Most cited references77

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Ecology. Physiology and climate change.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Climate change affects marine fishes through the oxygen limitation of thermal tolerance.

            A cause-and-effect understanding of climate influences on ecosystems requires evaluation of thermal limits of member species and of their ability to cope with changing temperatures. Laboratory data available for marine fish and invertebrates from various climatic regions led to the hypothesis that, as a unifying principle, a mismatch between the demand for oxygen and the capacity of oxygen supply to tissues is the first mechanism to restrict whole-animal tolerance to thermal extremes. We show in the eelpout, Zoarces viviparus, a bioindicator fish species for environmental monitoring from North and Baltic Seas (Helcom), that thermally limited oxygen delivery closely matches environmental temperatures beyond which growth performance and abundance decrease. Decrements in aerobic performance in warming seas will thus be the first process to cause extinction or relocation to cooler waters.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Tracking apex marine predator movements in a dynamic ocean.

              Pelagic marine predators face unprecedented challenges and uncertain futures. Overexploitation and climate variability impact the abundance and distribution of top predators in ocean ecosystems. Improved understanding of ecological patterns, evolutionary constraints and ecosystem function is critical for preventing extinctions, loss of biodiversity and disruption of ecosystem services. Recent advances in electronic tagging techniques have provided the capacity to observe the movements and long-distance migrations of animals in relation to ocean processes across a range of ecological scales. Tagging of Pacific Predators, a field programme of the Census of Marine Life, deployed 4,306 tags on 23 species in the North Pacific Ocean, resulting in a tracking data set of unprecedented scale and species diversity that covers 265,386 tracking days from 2000 to 2009. Here we report migration pathways, link ocean features to multispecies hotspots and illustrate niche partitioning within and among congener guilds. Our results indicate that the California Current large marine ecosystem and the North Pacific transition zone attract and retain a diverse assemblage of marine vertebrates. Within the California Current large marine ecosystem, several predator guilds seasonally undertake north-south migrations that may be driven by oceanic processes, species-specific thermal tolerances and shifts in prey distributions. We identify critical habitats across multinational boundaries and show that top predators exploit their environment in predictable ways, providing the foundation for spatial management of large marine ecosystems. ©2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Conserv Physiol
                Conserv Physiol
                conphys
                conphys
                Conservation Physiology
                Oxford University Press
                2051-1434
                2016
                18 October 2016
                : 4
                : 1
                : cow046
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Marine Biodiversity Exploitation and Conservation, UMR MARBEC (CNRS, IRD, IFREMER, UM), Place E. Bataillon cc 093, 34095 Montpellier, France
                [2 ]Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg , Medicinaregatan 18, 413 90 Gothenburg, Sweden
                [3 ]Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Institut Maurice-Lamontagne, Mont-Joli, QC, CanadaG5H 3Z4
                [4 ]Université de Bretagne Occidentale , UMR LEMAR, Unité PFOM-ARN, Centre Ifremer de Bretagne, ZI Pointe du Diable. CS 10070, 29280 Plouzané, France
                [5 ]Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Carleton University , Ottawa, ON, CanadaK1S 5B6
                [6 ]Longline Environment Ltd, 88 Wood Street, LondonEC2V 7RS, UK
                [7 ]Systemic Physiological and Ecotoxicological Research (SPHERE), Department of Biology, University of Antwerp , Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
                [8 ]CNR–IAMC, Istituto per l'Ambiente Marino Costiero, 09072 Torregrande, Oristano, Italy
                [9 ]CCMAR – Centre for Marine Sciences, Universidade do Algarve , 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
                [10 ]Center for Marine Research, Ruder Boskovic Institute, Giordano Paliaga 5, 52210 Rovinj, Croatia
                [11 ]Department of Biology and Hjort Centre for Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Bergen , 5020 Bergen, Norway
                [12 ]Institute of Biodiversity,Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical,Veterinary and Life Sciences, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow , Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
                [13 ]Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo , PO Box 1066,NO-0316 Oslo,Norway
                [14 ]Laboratory of Animal Physiology, Department of Zoology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki , Thessaloniki, Greece
                [15 ]Institute for Hydrobiology and Fisheries Science, University of Hamburg , Olbersweg 24, Hamburg 22767, Germany
                [16 ]Department of Ecology and Hydrology, Faculty of Biology, Espinardo, Regional Campus of International Excellence ‘Campus Mare Nostrum’, University of Murcia , Murcia, Spain
                [17 ]IMARES, Institute for Marine Resources and Ecosystem Studies, PO Box 68, 1970 AB IJmuiden, The Netherlands
                [18 ]Core Technology Facility, The University of Manchester , 46 Grafton Street, Manchester M13 9NT, UK
                [19 ]Marine Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen , Strandpromenaden 5, DK-3000 Helsingør, Denmark
                [20 ]Section for Ecosystem-based Marine Management, National Institute of Aquatic Resources (DTU-Aqua), Technical University of Denmark , Jægersborg Allé 1, DK-2920 Charlottenlund, Denmark
                [21 ]Department of Coastal Systems, NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research and Utrecht University , PO Box 59, 1790 AB Den Burg, Texel, The Netherlands
                [22 ]Department of Zoophysiology, Aarhus University , 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
                [23 ]Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research (CIIMAR), University of Porto , 4050-123 Porto, Portugal
                [24 ]Biosciences, College of Life & Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter , ExeterEX4 4QD, UK
                [25 ]Centre for Environment,Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft Laboratory, Suffolk NR33 0HT, UK
                Author notes
                [* ] Corresponding author: Centre for Marine Biodiversity Exploitation and Conservation, UMR MARBEC (CNRS, IRD, IFREMER, UM), Place E. Bataillon cc 093, 34095 Montpellier, France. Email: david.mckenzie@ 123456cnrs.fr
                Article
                cow046
                10.1093/conphys/cow046
                5070530
                27766156
                a15d95f1-c889-4469-b2cf-0c8a5ef895b6
                © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press and the Society for Experimental Biology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 10 June 2016
                : 17 August 2016
                : 13 September 2016
                Page count
                Pages: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: EU COST Action;
                Award ID: FA1004
                Funded by: Conservation Physiology of Marine Fishes;
                Categories
                Review

                biomarkers,ecological models,fisheries,fry paradigm,individual variation,telemetry

                Comments

                Comment on this article