67
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The vesicular SNARE Synaptobrevin is required for Semaphorin 3A axonal repulsion

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Semaphorin 3A-mediated signaling and axonal repulsion in the mouse brain require Synaptobrevin-dependent vesicular traffic.

          Abstract

          Attractive and repulsive molecules such as Semaphorins (Sema) trigger rapid responses that control the navigation of axonal growth cones. The role of vesicular traffic in axonal guidance is still largely unknown. The exocytic vesicular soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive fusion protein attachment protein receptor (SNARE) Synaptobrevin 2 (Syb2) is known for mediating neurotransmitter release in mature neurons, but its potential role in axonal guidance remains elusive. Here we show that Syb2 is required for Sema3A-dependent repulsion but not Sema3C-dependent attraction in cultured neurons and in the mouse brain. Syb2 associated with Neuropilin 1 and Plexin A1, two essential components of the Sema3A receptor, via its juxtatransmembrane domain. Sema3A receptor and Syb2 colocalize in endosomal membranes. Moreover, upon Sema3A treatment, Syb2-deficient neurons failed to collapse and transport Plexin A1 to cell bodies. Reconstitution of Sema3A receptor in nonneuronal cells revealed that Sema3A further inhibited the exocytosis of Syb2. Therefore, Sema3A-mediated signaling and axonal repulsion require Syb2-dependent vesicular traffic.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The molecular biology of axon guidance.

          Neuronal growth cones navigate over long distances along specific pathways to find their correct targets. The mechanisms and molecules that direct this pathfinding are the topics of this review. Growth cones appear to be guided by at least four different mechanisms: contact attraction, chemoattraction, contact repulsion, and chemorepulsion. Evidence is accumulating that these mechanisms act simultaneously and in a coordinated manner to direct pathfinding and that they are mediated by mechanistically and evolutionarily conserved ligand-receptor systems.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Neurotoxins affecting neuroexocytosis.

            Nerve terminals are specific sites of action of a very large number of toxins produced by many different organisms. The mechanism of action of three groups of presynaptic neurotoxins that interfere directly with the process of neurotransmitter release is reviewed, whereas presynaptic neurotoxins acting on ion channels are not dealt with here. These neurotoxins can be grouped in three large families: 1) the clostridial neurotoxins that act inside nerves and block neurotransmitter release via their metalloproteolytic activity directed specifically on SNARE proteins; 2) the snake presynaptic neurotoxins with phospholipase A(2) activity, whose site of action is still undefined and which induce the release of acethylcholine followed by impairment of synaptic functions; and 3) the excitatory latrotoxin-like neurotoxins that induce a massive release of neurotransmitter at peripheral and central synapses. Their modes of binding, sites of action, and biochemical activities are discussed in relation to the symptoms of the diseases they cause. The use of these toxins in cell biology and neuroscience is considered as well as the therapeutic utilization of the botulinum neurotoxins in human diseases characterized by hyperfunction of cholinergic terminals.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Plexin-neuropilin-1 complexes form functional semaphorin-3A receptors.

              Class 1 and 3 semaphorins repulse axons but bind to different cell surface proteins. We find that the two known semaphorin-binding proteins, plexin 1 (Plex 1) and neuropilin-1 (NP-1), form a stable complex. Plex 1 alone does not bind semaphorin-3A (Sema3A), but the NP-1/Plex 1 complex has a higher affinity for Sema3A than does NP-1 alone. While Sema3A binding to NP-1 does not alter nonneuronal cell morphology, Sema3A interaction with NP-1/Plex 1 complexes induces adherent cells to round up. Expression of a dominant-negative Plex 1 in sensory neurons blocks Sema3A-induced growth cone collapse. Sema3A treatment leads to the redistribution of growth cone NP-1 and plexin into clusters. Thus, physiologic Sema3A receptors consist of NP-1/plexin complexes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Cell Biol
                J. Cell Biol
                jcb
                The Journal of Cell Biology
                The Rockefeller University Press
                0021-9525
                1540-8140
                9 January 2012
                : 196
                : 1
                : 37-46
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Jacques Monod Institute, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR7592, Program in Development and Neurobiology, Paris, 75013 France
                [2 ]“Membrane Traffic in Neuronal and Epithelial Morphogenesis,” Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ERL U950, Paris, 75013 France
                [3 ]Institut de Biologie de l’École Normale Supérieure, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1024, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR8197, Paris, 75005 France
                [4 ]Cochin Institute, University Paris Descartes, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR8104, Department in Genetic and Development, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U567, Paris, 75005 France
                [5 ]”Axon Regeneration and Growth,” Physiopathologie des Maladies du Système Nerveux Central, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U952, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR 7224, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, 75005 France
                [6 ]Laboratory of Cell Adhesion Dynamics, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment, Candiolo, 10060 Italy
                [7 ]Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Torino School of Medicine, Candiolo, 10060 Italy
                [8 ]Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U682, Strasbourg, 67000 France
                [9 ]Institute of Biochemistry, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, 30001 Germany
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Thierry Galli: thierry.galli@ 123456inserm.fr
                Article
                201106113
                10.1083/jcb.201106113
                3255983
                22213797
                a31afc3d-d6d2-4696-839c-98f521fe2f30
                © 2012 Zylbersztejn et al.

                This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).

                History
                : 20 June 2011
                : 1 December 2011
                Categories
                Research Articles
                Report

                Cell biology
                Cell biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article