Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Exploring views and experiences of the general public’s adoption of digital technologies for healthy lifestyle in Singapore: a qualitative study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Little is known about the general adult population’s adoption of digital technology to support healthy lifestyle, especially when they are expected to take greater personal responsibility for managing their health and well-being today. The current qualitative study intended to gain an in-depth understanding of determinants of digital technology adoption for healthy lifestyle among community-dwelling adults in Singapore.

          Design

          A qualitative study design, with thematic framework analysis was applied to develop themes from the data.

          Setting

          Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with participants either face-to-face or online through a videoconferencing platform.

          Participants

          14 women and 16 men from the general population who were between the ages of 22 and 71 years.

          Results

          Three major themes were developed: (1) digitally disempowered (2) safety and perceived risks and harm; (3) cultural values and drives. Adoption of technology among the general population is needs-driven, and contingent on individual, technological and other cross-cultural contextual factors.

          Conclusion

          Our findings highlight there is no one solution which fits all individuals, emphasizing the challenges of catering to diverse groups to reduce barriers to adoption of digital technologies for healthy lifestyle. Digital guidance and training, as well as social influences, can motivate technological adoption in the population. However, technical problems as well as data security and privacy concerns should first be adequately addressed. This study provides rich cross-cultural insights and informs policy-making due to its alignment with government public health initiatives to promote healthy lifestyle.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

          Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design. To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (in depth interviews and focus groups). We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed. Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research

              Background The Framework Method is becoming an increasingly popular approach to the management and analysis of qualitative data in health research. However, there is confusion about its potential application and limitations. Discussion The article discusses when it is appropriate to adopt the Framework Method and explains the procedure for using it in multi-disciplinary health research teams, or those that involve clinicians, patients and lay people. The stages of the method are illustrated using examples from a published study. Summary Used effectively, with the leadership of an experienced qualitative researcher, the Framework Method is a systematic and flexible approach to analysing qualitative data and is appropriate for use in research teams even where not all members have previous experience of conducting qualitative research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Public Health
                Front Public Health
                Front. Public Health
                Frontiers in Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2565
                18 September 2023
                2023
                : 11
                : 1227146
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Research Division, Institute of Mental Health , Singapore, Singapore
                [2] 2Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London , London, United Kingdom
                [3] 3Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University , Singapore, Singapore
                [4] 4Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore , Singapore, Singapore
                Author notes

                Edited by: Denise Veelo, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Netherlands

                Reviewed by: Karen Carlisle, James Cook University, Australia; Gabriel Gomes De Oliveira, State University of Campinas, Brazil

                *Correspondence: Kumarasan Roystonn, k_roystonn@ 123456imh.com.sg
                Article
                10.3389/fpubh.2023.1227146
                10545896
                37794896
                acf949ca-a265-4a6b-b415-9475b2cc3499
                Copyright © 2023 Roystonn, AshaRani, Devi, Wang, Zhang, Jeyagurunathan, Abdin, Car, Chong and Subramaniam.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 22 May 2023
                : 04 September 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 73, Pages: 12, Words: 10563
                Categories
                Public Health
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Digital Public Health

                digital technology,healthy lifestyle,technology adoption,ethical considerations,digital public health,qualitative research

                Comments

                Comment on this article